Reviews

16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Review of The Hurt Locker
15 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Watching The Hurt Locker is a stunning ordeal.

It takes the viewer by the scruff of the neck -- that's why the hairs on one's neck stand up. And it embeds him or her in the middle of an Explosive Ordnance Disposal squad in Baghdad.

We're in an environment that is as alienating as being in outer space. When a member of the squad approaches a potentially-cataclysmic bomb, we're with him lumbering, breathing heavily, in a weighty Kevlar suit, like a man on the moon.

Or we're in the desert on foot under fire, trying to return it against an enemy we have trouble seeing.

Or we're in a jouncing vehicle, with a toy stuffed camel and a cross dangling from the mirror, in a joyless ride through hell.

Read the complete review:

http://tonymacklin.net/content.php?cID=251

Tony Macklin

http://tonymacklin.net
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mutluluk (2007)
6/10
Review of Bliss (2007)
14 July 2009
Bliss is a provocative voyage across the exotic landscape and placid waterways of Turkey.

Set in an intriguing locale, based on an important novel, Bliss is the tale of diverse culture and sharp -- sometimes brutal -- conflicts. It is a voyage of coming to grips with the challenging cultural mix of tradition and modernity.

Since one of the major factors in this movie is the concept of honor killing, it seems as though it will be very depressing, but ultimately Bliss is life-affirming.

Read the full review here:

http://tonymacklin.net/content.php?cID=250

Tony Macklin

http://tonymacklin.net/
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Review of Public Enemies (2009)
2 July 2009
When contemporary songstress Diana Krall sings "Bye Bye Blackbird" -- as Johnny Dillinger (Johnny Depp) and Billie Frechette (Marion Cotillard) have their first dance -- it becomes the theme song for Public Enemies. It's a bolt from the blues.

Michael Mann's brilliant and deceptive new film is full of such themes lurking in its shadows. That's what makes it provocative, challenging, and rewarding.

Mann takes a well-recognized historical figure in a well-known time in a well-worn genre and gives them revitalized life. But one has to be alert to see beyond the past.

Mann is sly, inventive, and sometimes subtle amidst the familiar goings-on. He remints the fabled career of John Dillinger in the 1930s.

One expects Mann to make some pungent social criticism in his mise en scene and plot machinations. And he does, with panache.

One especially provocative sequence in Public Enemies is a torture scene in which the brutality only gains misinformation. It is a compelling mirror of today's interrogation techniques.

Mann also introduces the concept of burgeoning surveillance which is a telling harbinger of what is to come.

But Mann doesn't state the obvious; he lets the actions speak louder than words. Mann lets history -- and its meaning -- speak for itself.

A revelatory example is the infamous "lady in red," whom many people know as the woman who betrayed and who was with Dillinger at the Biograph theater in Chicago.

In actuality the woman was not in red. In Mann's movie, as in actuality, she wore an orange skirt, which some people mistook as red. And so the legend. Mann doesn't explain that he's bringing actuality to myth. It's there for us to discover.

John Dillinger as portrayed by Mann and Johnny Depp (another JD) is a glamorized figure, who seems nearly flawless His fundamental attribute is loyalty. He is charming, cool, and smart. He's Robin Hoodlum.

Besides Depp, another fortuitous casting is Marion Cotillard as Billie Frechette, the coat check girl who becomes the soul mate of Dillinger. Cotillard won an Oscar as another bird -- Edith Piaf in La Vie en Rose (2007).

Public Enemies is very much a romance.

Christian Bale gives humanity to the stolid but earnest agent Melvin Purvis, whom J. Edgar Hoover (Billy Crudup) picks to head his special force to catch Dillinger. Hoover is in the process of developing the FBI and names Dillinger as the first Public Enemy #1.

Stephen Lang is memorable as the Texas lawman who assists Purvis. He adds substance to the luminous, fictional denouement.

Mann and writers Ronan Bennett and Ann Biderman have created a canny script. Public Enemies may remind one of the scope and vision of Altman's Thieves Like Us (1974).

Mann has created an evocative, beautiful movie in Public Enemies. Cinematographer Dante Spinotti -- in their fifth collaboration -- creates breathtaking tableaux from a palette with strokes of mesmerizing light.

Mann employs scenes and shots that remind us of Hitchcock. There's suspense at a stoplight. There's a shot in a movie theater that reminds us of the tennis match in Strangers on a Train (1951).

Mann also uses techniques that may remind us of graphic novels -- flashes of light from tommy guns. There's a surrealistic night scene in the woods around Little Bohemia lodge in Wisconsin.

But perhaps the most effective use of past movies is the sequence in the Biograph theater before Dillinger meets his fate. Mann uses clips from Manhattan Melodrama (1934) starring Clark Gable as Blackie (more fortuity), which actually was playing at the Biograph.

One of the fundamental themes in Mann's work is about men who hold to their personal codes against society and institutions. It's in all Mann's movies -- Thief (1981), The Insider (1999).

Blackie in Manhattan Melodrama has a code; he refuses the governor's (William Powell) offer of commutation and accepts death. In Manhattan Melodrama he says, "If I can't live the way I want, at least let me die when I want." Blackie is true to his principles and character -- like Mann's Dillinger.

Dillinger watches the movie and obviously relates to what is on screen. Talk about irony.

Movies make strange bedfellows -- Gable and Dillinger. Life is image.

Mann espouses individuality, but realizes it comes with a heavy price. The individual always winds up the target of the group Business wins out.

In Public Enemies Mann has several shots of the group. One of his early shots is of prisoners trudging in a line in a gray-walled prison.

Another is a group of pasty-faced feds.

Another is a roomful of men sitting before phones taking bets. Dillinger's exploits threaten the crime mob because they bring attention to them. One mobster tells Dillinger he is "bad for business." The group is out to destroy the outsider.

Mann's Dillinger is a descendant of the cowboy. He sings, "Get along little doggies." He lies in bed beneath a picture of a man riding a bucking bronco.

Clocks and watches punctuate Public Enemies. Time is running out.

But what a countdown! Public Enemies is a delicious feast for an interpretive viewer.

Blackbird under glass. A rare treat.

Tony Macklin

http://tonymacklin.net/
18 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Review of Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
1 July 2009
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is a popular mixture of absorbing adventure and clattering claptrap. Unfortunately, the latter dominates way too much.

It's machines on Viagra. I'm happy for the machines -- less so for the humans.

Director Micahel Bay is the master pimp for the machines. He brings them together in violent coitus never-interruptus.

I'm not outraged or offended by Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen as are many of my peers; in fact, I enjoyed some of it.

But where Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen falters and fails is obvious. It turns action into cliché -- as stylistic and vibrant as the special effects are, they are made redundant and dulled by the ham-footed pedal-to-the-metal direction.

Read the full review:

http://tonymacklin.net/content.php?cID=247

Tony Macklin

http://tonymacklin.net/
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Review of Very Bad Things (1998)
22 June 2009
The box office success of The Hangover puts into interesting context another movie about a bachelor party that goes wrong in Las Vegas. The other brutal bachelor blast is 1998's Very Bad Things.

The Hangover is an uneven romp that is intermittently funny, formulaically-written, and pretty forgettable. Therefore, I could recommend it to most viewers.

On the other hand, I might be able to recommend Very Bad Things to only 20% of viewers -- one in five -- but that minority will get a lasting kick out of it.

Very Bad Things is a horrible hoot. It is one of those movies that put you through the wringer. It doesn't tickle the funny bone -- it pulverizes it. You don't know whether to laugh, gasp, or walk out.

Read the complete review:

http://tonymacklin.net/content.php?cID=244

Tony Macklin

http://tonymacklin.net/
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Review of The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (2009)
18 June 2009
The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 begins in disarray.

The dialogue starts with a spate of obscenities -- blank, blank, blankety-blank. Blah.

If the dialogue makes obscenity vapid, the style is spastic. The opening credit sequence jumps, zooms, and goes on a wild ride of camera fidgets.

Wham, bam, thank you cam.

It looks as though The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 is going to take us on a tacky subway ride through the slums of language and style.

But as undependable as director Tony Scott is, his two leading actors are not going to lose their way. Denzel Washington and John Travolta are rock-solid actors, and given a chance they will prevail.

Read the complete review:

http://tonymacklin.net/content.php?cID=243

Tony Macklin

http://tonymacklin.net/
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Hangover (2009)
4/10
Review of The Hangover
11 June 2009
The Hangover is a bumpy, raucous, raunchy road trip.

It's also pretty forgettable.

A couple of Bufferins and you'll be ready for the next comedy. Why do movies about overindulgence have to be overindulgent? I get a kick in the comic solar plexus from reviewers who call The Hangover and its ilk, "instant classics." They must have seen only one or two movies in their meager critical careers. They certainly don't know what "classic" is, and they don't seem to know comedy. If something is supposed to be humorous, they laugh, like reflexive audience members, but intention is not execution.

Read the complete review:

http://tonymacklin.net/content.php?cID=240

Tony Macklin

http://tonymacklin.net
6 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Up (2009)
8/10
Review of Up
6 June 2009
The previews for Up were not enticing.

They showed a grumpy old man and a dumpy little boy. This seemed a very pedestrian odd couple. They inspired little or no anticipation.

Up is Pixar Animated Studio's latest and 10th effort. I loved Finding Nemo (2003) and, especially, Ratatouille (2007).

I thought Up probably would follow in WALL-E's (2008) intermittently clunky footsteps.

Fortunately my preconceptions about Up were wrong. Way wrong. It shouldn't work, but it does. Buoyantly.

Up is an engaging, exciting, warm-hearted trip at the movies. Up starts slowly, but picks up helium and soars.

Read the complete review:

http://tonymacklin.net/content.php?cID=238

Tony Macklin

http://tonymacklin.net
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What Goes Up (2009)
4/10
Review of What Goes Up
5 June 2009
Usually I'm the naysayer, going against the preposterous flackery of such venal arbiters as Pete Hammond and Rex Reed.

But I find myself giving faint praise to a movie that 20 out of 20 reviewers on Rottentomatoes rated "rotten." I kind of liked What Goes Up.

What Goes Up is an earnest morality tale. It's very uneven, but it also seems sincere. Sincerity is not enough for a positive rating, but it helps.

Read the complete review:

http://tonymacklin.net/content.php?cID=237

Tony Macklin

http://tonymacklin.net
1 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Star Trek (2009)
8/10
Review of Star Trek (2009)
12 May 2009
Star Trek is one slick, Enterprising movie.

In making yet another Star Trek, the great challenge the filmmakers -- J.J. Abrams, et al. -- faced was to be contemporary while also respecting the past.

The Trekkie franchise goes back to the beginning of Gene Roddenberry's TV series in 1966 -- 45 years ago. Maybe that's a blip in galaxy time, but it's two generations in human time.

Star Trek (2009) passes its obstacles with dazzling, time-warping colors. It's frisky fun yet has the ballast of essential quality.

Read the full review:

http://tonymacklin.net/content.php?cID=233

Tony Macklin

http://tonymacklin.net
0 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
State of Play (2009)
5/10
Review of State of Play
29 April 2009
I'm not Oliver Twist.

I don't need "more, please." My first portion was satisfying, thank you.

State of Play is like a very filling meal. As it appears to end, one sighs with satisfaction. It was an exciting thriller with a viable resolution. Time to leave the theater and consider the intriguing, relevant themes.

But wait. There's more. The meal has been reheated, and thrown back slapdash on the screen.

Read my complete review here: http://tonymacklin.net/content.php?cID=226

Tony Macklin http://tonymacklin.net
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
What's wrong with movies
29 July 2007
Universal Pictures should be ashamed of themselves. In the ad for The Bourne Ultimatum, they have the total hack Pete Hammond raving about the movie.

Hammond goes in the tank for everything. Whenever a studio needs pulp they go to him for mindless praise no matter how mediocre the movie. And he always delivers a gusher.

The Bourne Ultimatum deserves praise from legitimate critics -- not a puny hireling. The movie is much better than that. It demeans Bourne to have this leech hanging on.

The Bourne Ultimatum is one of those few movies that one can recommend to almost everyone. It will wind up on the best ten lists of most critics -- legitimate critics.

The Bourne Ultimatum has integrity. It deserves integrity.
24 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
J.C. Chávez (2007)
8/10
a very human portrait
20 June 2007
I reviewed Chavez for the Las Vegas Weekly when it appeared at the CineVegas Film Festival, and I talked about it on air with Al Bernstein on his Coast to Coast show on Sirius radio.

I liked the film a lot. It is a revealing, very human documentary.

Chavez is directed by 28-year-old actor-turned-director Diego Luna.

It has some defects. It starts slowly, and the white-on-white subtitles are a problem.

But anyone who says the movie doesn't have any themes simply doesn't know what he is talking about.

The themes are potent.

One of the most effective themes is the influence of family. Luna dedicates his movie to his own family. And he shows Chavez and his family in intimate, meaningful sequences.

A second major theme is how the mighty decline. Luna was in the hotel room in Phoenix before Chavez's last fight. And he was in the dressing room after the fight. The images of the beaten fighter are eloquent.

Chavez is a very human portrait. Luna invests it with his personal humanity.

Luna shows the potential that makes him a director to watch in the future.

Tony Macklin

Voices from the Set
5 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Miss Potter (2006)
9/10
An Engaging, delightful surprise
14 December 2006
Only the most curmudgeonly won't delight in this tender, inventive movie -- Miss Potter.

There aren't many movies that one can recommend to all of his or her friends, but Miss Potter may be the rare exception.

It has flair, style, and humanity.

Rene Zellwegger -- not everyone's favorite -- only occasionally simpers in her sensitive, forceful performance as writer Beatrix Potter.

Ewan McGregor and Emily Watson fit perfectly into their very likable characters.

The direction, screenplay, and art direction are all first-rate. And the sparing use of animation is wonderful. Peter Rabbit never looked so charming.
79 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Close to Home (2005–2007)
most hokey writers on TV
16 January 2006
Jennifer Finnigan is a good actress, but the banal, phony scripts on this show are way beneath her talent.

This is a show in which the characters don't speak dialogue that is true to their characters. The writers put lines into their mouths that they would never say.

The courtroom scenes are absurd. In a day of unbelievable courtroom testimony, this show is at the nadir. Attorneys sit passively and listen (in rapture?) to Annabel (Finnegan) emote.

What is most galling is that this promising show is failed by its trite writers.

Close to Home is Close to Hokum.
4 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Gives sensitivity and English teachers a bad name
25 August 2004
Mark Ruffalo and Peter Krause in the same movie! The two most simperingly "sensitive" actors in the business turn it into a vale of mess. No, the director did that. They just follow their worst instincts. I think Ruffalo is talented, but he's such a simp. And Krause, please get over it! Ruffalo has the movie market on simpering tied up; you have TV.

The comparisons with Edward Albee are ludicrous; Albee never had a single character who was a simp. (He also was blessed with director Mike Nichols.)

Naomi Watts and Laura Dern round out the female quartet -- now, Albee might have liked that concept.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed