IMDb > The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (2009)
The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotes
Overview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv schedule
Awards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage board
Plot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotes
Fun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQ
Other Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDesk
Promotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo gallery
External Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips

The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (2009) More at IMDbPro »

Photos (see all 63 | slideshow) Videos (see all 39)
The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (2009) -- Armed men hijack a New York City subway train, holding the passengers hostage in return for a ransom, and turning an ordinary day's work for dispatcher Walter Garbe (Washington) into a face-off with the mastermind behind the crime (Travolta).
The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (2009) -- Here's a clip from the movie The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3.
The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (2009) -- A look at the making of The Taking of Pelham 123.
The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (2009) -- Interview: Luis Guzman "On preparing for his character"
The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (2009) -- Armed men hijack a New York City subway train, holding the passengers hostage in return for a ransom, and turning an ordinary day's work for dispatcher Walter Garbe (Washington) into a face-off with the mastermind behind the crime (Travolta).

Overview

User Rating:
6.5/10   21,324 votes
MOVIEmeter: ?
Down 10% in popularity this week. See why on IMDbPro.
Director:
Writers (WGA):
Brian Helgeland (screenplay)
John Godey (novel)
Contact:
View company contact information for The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 on IMDbPro.
Release Date:
12 June 2009 (USA) more
Genre:
Plot:
Armed men hijack a New York City subway train, holding the passengers hostage in return for a ransom, and turning an ordinary day's work for dispatcher Walter Garber into a face-off with the mastermind behind the crime. full summary | full synopsis
Plot Keywords:
Awards:
2 nominations more
NewsDesk:
(109 articles)
First Trailer And Photos From Ridley Scott’s ‘Robin Hood’
 (From The Flickcast. 15 December 2009, 7:00 AM, PST)

Top 10 Worst Films of 2009
 (From t5m.com. 14 December 2009, 7:10 AM, PST)

User Comments:
Skip this and see the remarkable original Pelham instead. more (162 total)

Cast

  (Cast overview, first billed only)
Create a character page for: ?

Additional Details

Also Known As:
The Taking of Pelham 123 (UK) (promotional title) (USA) (promotional title)
more
MPAA:
Rated R for violence and pervasive language.
Runtime:
106 min
Country:
Language:
Color:
Aspect Ratio:
2.35 : 1 more
Sound Mix:

Fun Stuff

Trivia:
In the movie, from the audience's viewpoint, Ryder (John Travolta) is seen wearing an earring on his right ear while Walter Garber (Denzel Washington) has one on his left. Also notice that both of them has only a single earring. more
Goofs:
Factual errors: When the conductor is watching the passengers get on and off, she is in the 5th car. All conductors are always in the 6th car. more
Quotes:
Ryder: [describing Garber's voice] He sounds sexy. He would've been my bitch in prison. more
Movie Connections:
Featured in 81st Annual Academy Awards (2009) (TV) more
Soundtrack:
Counting Bodies Like Sheep to the Rhythm of the War Drums more

FAQ

What does the title "The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3" mean?
In what way does the remake differ from the original 1974 movie?
A Note Regarding Spoilers
more
17 out of 27 people found the following comment useful.
Skip this and see the remarkable original Pelham instead., 30 September 2009
4/10
Author: Troy_Campbell from Sydney, Australia

When placed side-by-side to the original 1974 classic slow-burning thriller, Tony Scott's remake looks like Danny Devito did in Twins: inferior in every way. Where Joseph Sargent's direction was subtle, Scott opts to shove everything down your throat; where Peter Stone's screenplay from 25 years ago was clever, Brian Helgeland tries too hard to make it hip and cool; and where Walter Matthau and Robert Shaw proved an unlikely but memorable pairing as good guy / bad guy, Washington and Travolta share next to no chemistry. So rather than sentencing this film to death by comparison (which it does deserve mind you) how does it go as a stand-alone picture? Tony Scott is essentially a glorified Michael Bay. Everything is done fast and loud, regardless if the film calls for it or not. Where this has worked for Top Gun or Crimson Tide it fails here. Scott has infused so much needless action with rapid edits and whiplashing camera movements that it proves to be distracting. Even an innocuous conversation between the Mayor and an adviser has a circling camera catching the scene, such is the constant motion Scott feels compelled to instil. It doesn't stop at the eyes though. Every chance possible our ears are assaulted with unnecessary sounds which are poorly matched to what we see on screen (at one point a helicopter sounds like an F1 car.) Occasionally a film calls for coarse language – some movies can even use excessive language to great effect (Reservoir Dogs or Boondock Saints for example) – however almost every time the F-bomb is dropped in Brian Helgeland's script, and it happens a hell of a lot, it is simply not required. 99% of the colourful language comes from Travolta's crim, but instead of emphasising emotion it purely makes him look stupid. Couple this with plot holes galore and this screenplay from the Oscar winner who wrote L.A. Confidential and Mystic River leaves a lot to be desired.

Thank goodness for Denzel. Incapable of delivering a bad performance, Scott's go-to man (this is their fourth collaboration) salvages this run-of-the-mill action / thriller with his nuanced performance and sheer charisma. As Garber (first name Walter as a nod to Matthau who played his 1974 counterpart), Washington finds a nice balance between your every day worker and someone able to step up in this extreme situation. Travolta doesn't succeed as the foul-mouthed psycho Ryder at all, his go-for-broke portrayal is laughable and ensures we can never take him seriously. Supporting players Gandolfini and Turturro are solid but don't have much to do.

Don't waste your money seeing this on the big screen, wait the six months and rent it on DVD. Better yet, skip this and see the remarkable original Pelham instead.

Was the above comment useful to you?
more (162 total)

Message Boards

Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (2009)
Recent Posts (updated daily)User
Better than the original filmforum242
Can somebody teach Travolta to swear!!!! kokain711
So who gets the 307 Million? UltramanMebius
What Travolta should have done juni5
Why did he want to keep talking to garber ?!! - *SPOILER ALERT *** palanihere-1
Denzel's acting job when he admits to taking the bribe for his kids nondescript_figure
more

Recommendations

If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
The Fugitive Live Free or Die Hard Swiri The Salton Sea Wanted
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Full cast and crew Company credits External reviews
News articles IMDb Crime section IMDb USA section
Add this title to MyMovies

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Update' button will take you through a step-by-step process.