Reviews

22 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Yes
8 June 2023
As An Autobot Currently Living Secretly Amongst Fleshbots I Found This Representation Of Our Society Quite Idealistic.

No Mention Is Made Of The Ongoing Culture Of Non Consensual Oil Draining, The Patriarch Vertical Authority, The Refusal To Aknowledge That Even If I Was Born An Autobot, I Do Not Identify As Such Anymore.

The Autobot Society Is Here Represented To You Naive Fleshbots As One Of Justice And Moral Integrity.

You Have Been Decieved.

The Maximals Are No Better.

Don't Support This Revisionist Take On Our Existance On This Planet.

China Is Were We Are All Born, And That Comes With Ties that Should Not Be Ignore.

Help Us.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
La peste (2018–2019)
10/10
Next level TV. This is the closest you're going to get to a Warhammer Fantasy film/series
28 April 2023
Everything about this was amazing : the story, the cinematography, the scenery, the acting, the casting. Dark, gloomy, gritty, grim, this is what the world looked like, almost a fantasy for us in our sanitized versions of the past, through Holywood.

But for all those strenght, the greatest ones really are the story and scenery, extremely immersive, with drama and action on several scales of the social ladder, which reminded me of the Warhammer campaign "The Enemy Within", and especially the chapter "Power Behind the Throne". Indeed, you could perfectly adapt this to a low fantasy Warhammer setting, and get the greatest visual inspiration.

Just a perfect series IMHO.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hellraiser (2022)
3/10
The greatest sin is boring us to hell
8 October 2022
This looked kinda good, except for the silly pearled needles. But this had zero sexual ambiguity, zero actual moral ambiguity, or philosophying about pain, pleasure, sex, ego, as what made the uneven original so interesting.

The story made little sense, as it was way too patchy.

All in all, this was a mess, and one that failed to capture attention. Even the gore special effects failed to generate squirm or any real unease.

It's like the real inspiration for this was Hellraiser 3. Actually, when I think of it, even the skinned flesh looked plastic, when you get to see it in light, towards the end, they managed to have the cenobites look like toys, rather than the sexual dirty beings of the first movie.

Lastly, yes, the end, how hte writers must have htought htey came up with a clever sort of twist, straight out of a first trimester of creative writer classroom, brfore a pointless epilogue that doesn't add anything to the story. And again failed to provoke.

A huge waste of potential, in my opinion.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Sandman (2022– )
9/10
Such a smart adaptation of one of the most clever stories of modern age.
9 August 2022
These days, I ararely take the time to review any of my viewings on IMDB, since it's filled with triggered trolls aiming to bash anything they can that hints at progress. How we came to that is baffling, but still sad.

Anyways.

I started reading the serialized Sandman in 1990, and it instantly changed my views on what comic books could achieve, in terms of literary quality. It opened me to the worlds of Alan Moore, Peter Milligan, Jamie Delano, John Wagner, etc.

I already loved comic books, but this felt I had graduated 10 classes in one go. I was not alone in that thought, as Sandman grew from obscurity to being a massive seller and critical darling. It was the herald of the Vertigo publishing banner, that sadly folded a few years ago.

Since the initial run, Sandman has.had numerous incarnations and sequels, few by Gaiman himself. We take those for what they are, good or lackluster stories, but they don't change a thing as of what the original story is.

I approached this TV series the same way. No expectations, hoping for at least some mild entertainement.

I didn't think it would be an impossible to addapt affair, but I never felt the need for such a venture.

Now that I've seen it all, I can say that I was at first getting what I was hoping for - mild entertainement - and then much more.. Let me be clear about this being an outstanding success, from the perspective of alover of the original work.

This 10 episodes series manages to adapt about a fourth of the whole series, with ease, which is very promissing for the future. I expected this to drag on like American Gods did, and it was the exact oposite, as it moved along at a great pace.

The first episode adapts the first issue, which made me fear I was going to get one episode for each of the 80 issues or so of the series, but thankfully, hte writers were honest with themselves about what was worth to extend, and what needed less space to develop. So we get about 20 issues worth of Sandman in a 10 episode season, PLUS, quite some Hellblazer.

Yes, Hellblazer, Constantine, John Constantine. My other favorite comic from DC Vertigo, which kinda ran parallel to Sandman, and was never done justice outside of the original 300 ssue run, appart from in the recent Spurrier run, connected to Sandman.

Some of it is pure easter egg, some of it runs deeper, but either way, it is quite ambitious to do so, and I felt rewarded by the storie's unfolding.

Other aspects connects this to the DC mythos, mostly with obscure character's being cleverly used, as in the comic. This just adds depth to the whole affair, but not getting it shouldn't really impair the enjoyement. It's just quite fun to see how they managed to connect many dots, in a way that works, even if no one would have complained if they didn't go that extra step.

Episode 6 was for me the highlights, after episodes 4 and 5 really already convincing me that this was a successful project. In that episode, the writers combien 3-4 different plots, in an even more intricate fashion than the comic book didand finally manage to actually move you, really expanding some characters beyond their comic book version.

After that, we get a whole storyline told in four episodes, quite faithfully so, leading us to a season ending that is an ending, and that shows you clearly what the matter is about. Us who know what is coming can only rejoice at how misleading the final words might be, for the new audience.

Now, nothing is perfect, and this series is attracting legions of critiques, mostly focusing on the gender/race swapping, and LGBTQ+ depictions.

Most of the critiques stating the series is boring and predictable also feature the race/gender/lgbtq agenda attacks, which should be telling.

That's your first clue about how disingenious most of those attacks are, since the original Sandman already has a strong cast of LGBTQ characters, and the sandman himself is pansexual.

As for the first critique, the comic book series had a prelude, and then started right away, in 1989, when the series was published. The authors chose for this to not be a period piece - which Sandman never was intended to be - and to start the story now, in 2022. This robbs us of a couple of great lines from the first issue, but makes up with added relevancy, that is more than welcome.

So, case by case :
  • White Lucien becoming black Lucienne, why should I care about the change? I don't, nothing is lost there
  • John Constantine becoming Joanna Constantine is a non issue, since Lady Joanna Constantine is the character that actually appears in ths past, in Sandman. As for hte modern cunterpart, again, this is not 1989, and that new version is true to character, and works well with the minor story changes related to this happening now. Also, It doesn't contradict the existence of John.


  • Death being a black chickinstead of a white one. To me, it makes perfect sense that since hte endless are a family, but beyond the concept of human family, there would be such differences. The only reason I would regret the white version is the nostalgia I have for Dringenberg and Bachalo's version, that moved me as many teens from the time.


  • Lucifer now being a woman, I felt was a great idea, since his character is now way more distinct from Desire. Lucifer is now this stoïc quasi asexual lady - about to to undertake a major change - rather than this sexually ambiguous and seductive character htat we loved in the comic book, but that was at the same time way too similar to Desire, which in my humble opinion lessened the impact of him/her.


When you add to this the fact that Desire is now a pure a brilliant Marc Almond (Soft Cell) "clone", to the point that you almost feel she's about to sing "Sex Dwarf", it was just a very sound decision.

So the final thought is that this excedeed any expectations I didn't even have, that if you break down most of the critique point by point, it never holds, that thois offers a worthy variation to the storyline of hte comic book, while remaining true and faithful more than just in spirit. The cast is actually pretty great, especially the ones you can compare with the series, and the changed ones are either adequate or really successfull. The dramatic construction of the whole season is pretty great, offers many variations of tones and stories, never stands still, and even if not every single subplot has the same life as in the comic, the same excitement, most of those remain, some are added, and they all serve the purpose of telling the story.

I'm shocked with how happy I am with this.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Parks and Recreation Special (2020 TV Special)
2/10
unecessary on every creative levels
10 May 2020
The show was a great piece of clever mainstream entertainement, at least its first five seasons. The last one felt forced but had some genuine funny moments. IMHO, reviewing art isn't like reviewing the technical quality of a skype conferance call. If I gave a 10 to Citizen Kane, I can only give a 6-7 to this show I yet loverd very much but can't claim eleveted the art of filming or narration. Yes it was really fun, way above the vast majority of tv comedy, yet, this special, hoever well intended, however limited in its technical possibilities, well, it didn't do anything creative or new out of its limitations. Worse than anything else, it wasn't especially funny, if at all. I get the nostalgia factor is a big factor here, but 10 star reviews, seriously? Let's see how you feel about that rating in a year or two, even six months! Honestly, it simply was quite bad. Good that it raised money, but that shouldn't have any impact on critical appreciation.
8 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dark Waters (2019)
4/10
Great case, topic, good prod value, ultimately not great movie
19 January 2020
The issues it adress are crucial, the true story is commandable. Unfortunately, the movie doesn't really work, IMHO. I didn't fall asleep or loose interest, but my interest was with the issue and cases presented, not with the actual movie making and talent. I love Todd Haynes, but it really felt underwhelming. Still, people should see it, as it is an crucial issue, I just don't see what this adeed to a documentary or book. It's main if only merit is bringing attention to this. I expected more cinematographicaly.
4 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Witcher (2019– )
3/10
It' not bad because it's supposedly "woke", but because it's poor.
25 December 2019
It's bad because the narration is cunky, the acting a best average, and it fails to be original. It's not atrocious, mind you, but the pacing is all over the place, and I really struggled to get through the wole. The fighting choregraphy was uneven : soetimes quite good and original, and the further we got into the series the more generic and half ased it got. When you get to episode 4, it starts to make more sense as a whole, but sadly, it goes dowhill from then again. The problems in this are such core ones that I don't see how this could be improved in the future seasons.

Oh and for the people who give it a 1/10 because supposed wokeness, this is not slavic Europe, this isn't even real : it doesn't matter at all if some characters are not white. You got your own vision of some charcters, fine, don't expect everyone to share that one, it's ego.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Vice Principals / Eastbound n Down > this
14 December 2019
It was alright, some good gags, and baby Billy was amazing. But it still was a step down from he past, and a much less empathic show. TBH, I think I'm even a little generous with this grading.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Collapse (2019)
9/10
The true apocalypse TV show we deserve after all this zombie drivel.
13 November 2019
Five episodes, all shot in one take, five different situations in an escalation. This was so tense it actually gave Chernobyl a match, with much much lesser means. Episode 1 is the weakest, because of the acting, but it already sets the mood : extreme paranoïa, and survival of the fittest! That was quite an achivement in horror in its purest sense. Highly recomended! Edit : Episodes 6-8 are on the same model, but add some interconnectivity between some storylines, to great effect.
29 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
High Fidelity (1984)
6/10
Demo reel short
17 October 2019
You can feel this was done as the future was in motion, that urgency was cardinal. All in all, it is a silly little story, like an Attari version of a pixar short. Those early Warp records videos, the artificial intelligence aesthetic, it's already all in there. Not as releavant now, but still a great testimony of what the future looked like in the past.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Swamp Thing (2019)
3/10
Where is the comic I loved?
4 June 2019
So let's put it to rest right from the start : I don't mind adaptation. I love the original Wrightson/Redondo book, and adore its later Alan Moore Following. I've read pretty much every Swamp Thing Book, even the bad ones. I know the concept is rooted in family friendly late 60ies horror, So there's of course some doubt about how htis could be relevant 50 years later. Well, after this pilot, I must say it isn't : it dumbed down something that wasn't that elaborate to begin with, with some terrible pacing (the ending, how is that a climax of a pilot?!), features some gratuiteous fan service (Madame Xanadu), and completely forgets what made the comic book great : its quiet tragedy nature. Swamp Thing, never was a Horror story in the traditional sense. It's much more of hipie version of Frankenstein, the novel. It tackles deep human emotions and nature, and will make you cry more than it will frigthen you.

This just seems to be run of the mill modern light-horror for TV, designed by studio execs, despite having the somewhat competant and comic book knowledgeable Mark Verheinden at the writing helm.

It is not irredeemable. But it's not off to a good start, even if you haven't read the comic, as its just mediocre, no brilliant ideas there. It doesn't look terrible, but it doesn't do much more than just that...
56 out of 122 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Inaccurate, but not for the reasons mostly reciewed here
24 February 2019
The movie is a decent american "edgy" drama, even if nothing really striking emerges.

The main issue one might have is if you are familiar with the factual aspects of the story.

I read the book it was based on years ago, and I don't remember any character remotely like Sky Ferreira. In fact, the journalists strongly implies Mayhem's leader was closet-gay, and that this was a huge part of why "Varg" murdered him. He was indeed pathetic, but his death was a sociopathic hate crime.

The one redeeming quality of the movie is that it really refrains from embracing a kind of romantic take on the scene, and especially on "Varg". There is a huge revisionist wave of thinking out there that these people were/are somewhat "free thinkers" and such, when in reality, they are nothing more than white trash with cliché male power fantasies. This doesn't mean those aren't interesting characters, far from it, but the movie doesn't really achieve anything valuable in that respect.

The subject deserved a more honest global take, or an even more subjective vision. At least it shows how sad these gus were.
10 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Strange Angel (2018–2019)
8/10
Finally a new compelling show in 2018
19 August 2018
2017 gave us The Handmaid's Tale, The Deuce, Westworld, Get Shorty, so until this show, 2018 was pretty much a lackluster year... This indeed is slow-paced, but not that much. It needed to be so, since it tackles two very unusal topics as well as being a good drama : the occult LA scene of the post war era, and aeronautics revolution. What's fascinating is that it connects the two in an unexpected fashion. Oh yeah, psychedelic drugs of course are involved in the process. There also are a handfull striking fantasy scenes that reveal the inner world of the main character and his vivid imagination, how he allows fantasy to connect with reality.

The last scene of the last episode is a cliffhanger, but even if the show was not to return, we get a prety good idea of what would happen after then, since we know actual history. Still, the potential is great, and I think this could turn into little unknown classic.

All in all, each episode made the show climb higher on my to-watch list, and nothing this year had me that compeled to watch the next season.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Miss Sloane (2016)
8/10
Great political thriller with one major shortcoming
14 October 2017
As entertainment, this is a very solid entry, as long as your take on entertainment goes beyond escapism. The acting is beyond great, the technical aspects mastered (even if my personal taste has an issue with the OST), you really feel sucked into the story. Chastain portrays what many reviewers have described as an unlikable character, which destroyed the movie's appeal for those very same reviewers, supposedly bummed to see a beautiful Hollywood star portray a sociopath or at the very least not a nice person. Oh my... All those reviews about Taxi Driver sucking so hard because the main character wasn't nice, and let's not forget about Citizen Kane! Sigh...

The real issue with the movie though, is that beyond the fact that it needs a perfectly acceptable suspension of belief in key moments, it kind of shoots itself in the foot :

The movie kind of bombed on the box office, and it's hard not to see why, since it was mostly distributed in the US. But how hard was that to predict when it actually tackles gun control - in the most rational way - but lets the righteous side win the war? In reality, the gun lobby is winning, and we get a fiction happy end, which serves no purpose but reinforce both sides in their own set of belief. If despite all the good will, efforts and moral justification, the pro gun control side didn't win, the message would probably be much more effective, but admittedly a downer.

So the movie is indeed highly entertaining, as a piece of Hollywood thrill, because in the end, that's all it is. If it really intended to serve the cause of gun control, it would need to take darker turns, at least in my opinion.

But I won't lie, I was entertained and thrilled, it's just not close to as political as the producers wished you to believe it was.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Get Shorty (2017–2019)
9/10
Curb your Breaking Fargo
1 October 2017
I won't give this a ten, since they could still fumble his up. But. One season in, 8 episodes, 7 hours 20 minutes in, and we have 2017's best new series. I came in this with no expectations, and this little show has been a constant joy and a must-see/top-of-the-pile amongst all Sunday shows.

Sure there was this nice little movie from the mid 90ies based on the same Leonard story, but this is next level : great if not amazing acting from underused actors, great balance between dark comedy and lightness, mostly acceptable violence, very cool and unusual characters, the plot constantly surprises with supposedly great ideas systematically getting south, etc... It's quirky, entertaining, extremely well acted (Sean Bridgers is getting the role of his life with his mormon hired hand assassin turned on-stage screen writer!), charming, and it always leaves you wanting for more. Also, there's no character that is really annoying, and there's a variety of them.

Along with The Deuce and the Handsmaid Tale, the best new show I've seen all year, and maybe the best show of them all, at the very least the one that I look the most forward returning.

Edit (fall 2018) : I did give it a ten after second season, since this is The best show around these days, absolutely. Season two starts a lttle slower, but soon catches up, and even manages to give the show a very satisfying conclusion , despite that it was announced this was getting a third season. They probably weren't sure this was a done deal and wrote it as if it was the final episode, with open ended threads. Hope they keep on the same level.
74 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Nothing like Making A Murderer
29 November 2016
That review is from watching the first 6 episodes out of 8.

This attracted me because of the reported similarities to the Making A Murderer series. Sadly, however interesting the topi at hand is, the approach and tone is pure sensationalism, the editing is one of reality TV character, and the humanity and emotional aspects are vastly lacking. In itself it could be OK, but as the "investgation" is heavily leaning on the grimmest possible path, you start to feel that the producers wanted to mix the last scene from "Seven" with TV reality storytelling. Oh, and it doesn't help that throughout, we learn that the investigation led by the journalists has actually mostly matched the ones led by police departments. Two episodes to go, but I can already safely say that this isn't something I'd recommend my family to watch, unlike "Making A Murderer". In the end, the results of the investigation might be interesting, but this was tastelessly done to say the least. I just wish I could follow this without feeling like I'm watching porn...
16 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The League: When Rafi Met Randy (2014)
Season 6, Episode 4
10/10
Magic strikes again
8 October 2015
After their original Rafi & Randy centric episode from last season, the dynamic duo ups the ant with some truly wonderful bits of poetry. While the show too regularly relies on dick jokes and sexual innuendos, the RnR centrics dwell into camaraderie, strong feelings, sceneries akin to Salvador Dali or Marcel Duchamps, just strong and beautiful material here. While their previous episode was a coming from a James Elroy meets Brian DePalma scope, this one starts where it left from with a DePalma-esque feel, but adds subtlety and some kind of Emir Kusturica grandeur. Everyone is fat, greasy, slobs, joyous and dark at the same time, like a strange cross of Miro and Bacon with some John K thrown into the equation. Now let's hope season 7 doesn't betray us and keeps up with this great American tradition that is the annual RnR episode. Just superb.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Utter trash! Enormous disappointment.
8 October 2005
Don't get me wrong, I love most of Paul Schrader's movies, so it was with sheer excitement I was able to attend at the "Rolling Thunder" screening at the Parisian french cinemathèque with surprise movie on the 17th Dec 2004. Of course the surprise movie was The Exorcist and most people were there for that (I was too). The film was then finished but the score, so P Schrader used excerpts from The Return of the King and some other movie I forget (Was it Conan?). Anyways, apart from that the movie was finalized. The happy few there (maybe 200 people) were told to please not write about the film on the internet or magazines since it may have jeopardized its chance of getting selected to the Cannes Film Festival. Then came the film, then came the realization that the film might not get selected for the Festival because of its quality : Never in my life had I experienced such a feeling of awkwardness in the audience as people went from being skeptical to plainly laughing out loud at the pity-full spectacle. I couldn't believe how low the author of Light Sleeper, Mishima, Blue Collar and Affliction had sunk.

Forced over-the-top acting thorough, stupid ending, black and white moral, awful FXs, worst take on Christianity from Schrader ever, not even suspenseful, just boring as hell (no pun intended) and unsurprising at all! Some good locations but sadly miss-used or at least not fulfilling the initial hopes! In the end I was 100 times more satisfied by the Schrader penned Rolling Thunder and wished my 2 hours back.

Don't believe the hype, even the John Boorman movie is more exciting and original. Oh, and the Billy Crawford casting, the poor guy does his best, but what where you expecting? He's now part of the small club of worst casting mistakes ever! I give the movie a 1/5 just because I didn't leave the room, but I should have.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Saint Ange (2004)
3/10
Vaccum movie with some effective silly scenes.
5 July 2004
First off, this is supposed to come out as a treat for fans of Fulci's The Beyond (it even features the return of its star Catriona MacColl) and his other gloomy films. So it's got nice locations (romanian studios), pretty minimal as the whole movie takes place in a great mansion supposed to be a WWII orphanage, its narrowing woods and cellars. Cast is pretty top notch with kinky Virginie Ledoyen (L'Eau Froide, La Cérémonie, La fille seule - her only good movies in my opinion - The Beach) and wacko Lou Doillon (Jane Birkin's daughter - one of the most irritating actress to come out of french cinema lately, but physically disturbing and therefore probably appropriate for this movie!).

Beautiful photography, gloomy atmosphere, weird and nasty children (kinda reminiscent of the evil ones in Cronenberg's The Brood, but not really either), derelict locations, potential scream queens, this movie shows good production values but sadly remains pretty lazy storywise. I won't describe the story too much, but after a pretty classy/classic (easy) hour of ghost induced story, the movie goes wacko and tries to become a bit disturbing. Unfortunately, even if the scenery and filming shows you some very weird and dare I say effective clinical & morbid images (the only part giving the movie a little of its own personality), those images bears no real depth and fall flat in utter stupidity! So even though I admire the plastic quality of the last half hour, I remain highly skeptical in its capacity to convey an interesting story falling back on its feet without relying on weirdness because the lazy writer(s?) have no real vision of the story as a whole. Also, the twist revelation about the cats killer's identity is really lame. Sadly, another example of France incapacity to produce thoughtful and provocative fantasy...

Think a mixture of Furie's "The Entity", Robert Wise's "The Haunting" with Fulci's "The Beyond" and Chris Cunningham's clinical imagery.

Just one's opinion.

4/10
101 out of 135 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Good Girl (2002)
1/10
This is not cinema. Awful!
3 July 2003
Did they try to marry American beauty with a Cohen Brother movie? Well, we ended up with a lesson of what not to do in cinema! Boring second lead characters with no impact on the story except vulgar jokes... Aniston can't escape her Friends character and manages to annoy me simply because of the way she walks and looks at other characters... Why would this girl suddenly decide she wants to change her ways and her life? There's no reason such a character with her upbringing would have this kind of dynamics, at least not with the poor exposition we get... Totally dull and pretentious! 1/10
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Clean, Shaven (1993)
10/10
Favorite modern film, ever!
3 July 2003
Allright, it's not in the same category as Preminger, Lang, Ford or Reed, but still, this is an incredible use of sound, music, actors and minimalist camera action... If Bresson was American, he would maybe not even top that! The only movie that stands comparison to this one would in my opinion be Philip Ridley's The Mirror. Try to see it in a movie- theatre, then buy the tape or the DVD... Just watch the scene when the cop realizes he had it all wrong, the final ghostly scene with the daughter and the radio, the scene between Peter Greene (could it get better? maybe not even William Fichtner!) and his mother at the table. So much, so much... Clare Dolan (Kerrigan's second film) was great (opening credit sequence!), but maybe less scary.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Solaris (2002)
10/10
Never thought I'd like this movie that much! Mind trip!
22 June 2003
Alright.. I hear people found this movie boring and compare it to Tarkovsky's version? Well... Have you actually watched the 1973 (1972?) version? I have. I love most Tarkovsky movies and this was the only one I hated. I love science fiction and was completely amazed by Soderbergh's. Sure the "message" (guilt, technology vs "human heart") appealed to me, but much more than that, the flow of the movie simply took me by surprise.. You find it slow and useless? Well, just open the eyes and the ears : Cliff Martinez (an old Beefheart drummer and soderbergh's usual music composer) finally provides what I expected from him. After using the wonderful ethereal Michael Brook guitar delay sound in Traffic, he uses this time the Bashet 'structures sonores', amazing french percussive instruments that give a balinese/gamelan feeling to the music (and the movie). This is a most perfect collaboration between visuals and sounds, that justifies completely the slow pacing of the movie.

The acting is eerie and on spot... Must also add it's not the painful to watch movie it's been described. It's actually pretty easy to follow and to lay back to.

Highly recommended! 17/20
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed