The new "Time Machine" retains its Edwardian time period and much of its familiar plot, but has been transported from London to New York City. The time traveler's name is now Alexander Hartdegen (there's a limerick in there somewhere), a part well-played by Guy Pearce, who, befitting his genius character, looks a bit drawn here.
One fateful night, absent-minded scientist Alex nearly forgets an important date with Emma, his hoped-for fiancé-to-be. Beautiful Sienna Guillory makes an impressive though brief appearance as Emma. She lights up the screen with her presence (her resemblance to Jessica Lange is so strong, she could be her daughter).
Unexpected events upset Alex's plans and set him to work creating a time machine
and after four or five self-denying years of intensive labor, he succeeds. It's a nicely designed contraption, too, one that puts its own stamp on the archetypal "spinning" design from the 1960 film. It looks right, like it actually might work. Suspension of disbelief is further aided by several early allusions to Alex's brilliance (for example, a humorous reference is made to an unknown Albert Einstein needing his advice).
So into the past Alex rushes, with barely a beta-test or concern. And when he again hooks up with Emma for their date, does she notice any change in him? After so long a time (on his part only) of sleep deprived obsession, mightn't she have said "Darling, you've aged five years overnight!"
Alas, Alex soon discovers that destiny cannot be altered (for some reason this revelation provoked audience laughter, though I thought it was handled skillfully enough). Dejected, he journeys into the far future, stopping once or twice to explore mankind's progress. In the film's first of many unintentionally comic missteps, he leaves his machine unattended in an improbably empty urban space, where no one interferes with it. No thief, vandal or policeman gives this big, expensive-looking curiosity a second glance
in New York?
It's during Alex's initial excursion into a near-future Manhattan that we enter Truly Heinous territory. Alex visits the New York Public Library and meets Vox, a holographic librarian (a miscast Orlando Jones). When Alex asks this talking "encyclopedia of all the world's knowledge" about time travel, Vox scoffs at the concept as nothing but fiction, citing H.G. Wells' famous book and the 1960 movie. Vox claims to be tortured by never forgetting anything. Indeed, when he ultra-improbably meets Alex 800,000 years in the future, he recalls their previous conversation
but does he mention that ol' H.G. was uncannily prescient?
The film continues to lose its bearings as tens of thousands of years pass. Rivers form, mountains erode, yet when we arrive in the year 802,701, words chiseled into 20th Century NYC stonework are still clearly legible! Apparently, humanity has not changed all that much, either. For one thing, their background music sounds like the "Lion King" soundtrack (and I thought the faux-tribal music in "Return of the Jedi" was embarrassing).
Alex soon meets one-half of humanity's descendants, the Eloi, including beautiful Mara (Samantha Mumba) and her young son, who speak English. This seems ludicrous even after we learn that virtual Vox continues to hold court in the nearby NYPL ruins (that is one amazing computer warranty!).
In the 1960 movie, the Eloi were appropriately weak and passive, like effete teenagers. Blonde and blandly good-looking, they reflected fears of the future based on the dominant youth culture of the time. The new Eloi also reflect popular culture. With their tribal tattoos and glistening dark skin, they are like fiercely beautiful MTV rockers. Yet despite prominent muscles, they remain inexplicably defenseless against the evil Morlocks.
Alex and Mara bond just in time for her to be carried off (in daylight?) by the flesh-eating Morlocks. Alex heroically follows into no-man's land, where he encounters the Über-Morlock (Jeremy Irons). In a rush of exposition, the telepathic Ü.M. explains how Man became two races, but the scene is totally confusing, and at this point both Mr. Irons and the plot become superfluous.
Strangely, actors Yancey Arias and Philip Bosco are also prominently billed, yet neither, as far as I could discern, appear in the movie. Perhaps their deleted scenes contained material that might have helped hold the film together? Spoiler Alert It's absurd to quibble by this point (spoilers ahead!), but the film loses all remaining vestiges of credibility in the final minutes. For example, Ü.M. warns that without his powers there would be no control over the Morlocks, who would otherwise quickly exhaust their food supply (people). Nevertheless, Alex dispatches him -- and we must pray, all remaining Morlocks -- by causing his machine to meltdown. How did Alex know how to destroy his machine, what would happen when he did, and that all the Morlocks were in range? And how lucky he and his Eloi friends were to so narrowly escape the blast radius! Also, the overall time concepts lacked sense. Alex changes the destiny of Mara and the Eloi
so why was it impossible for him to change his own destiny?
There are some excellent visuals in "The Time Machine," and nice special effects. Turn of the century New York is very pretty, as is the hanging cliff-village of the future. The best effect is too brief and involves Earth's moon breaking apart. Later, when we see the partially disintegrated moon and its detritus in an orbital ring around the Earth, it's very cool.
Unfortunately, there's not enough of this, and not enough creativity or playfulness in the time-travel itself. In a movie largely dependent on special effects, that's the stuff that should have been enlarged upon. There's a great money shot showing the growth of a technological Earth, but it comes too soon. The small, changing details as seen from the time traveler's point of view were much more effective.
5 out of 7 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends