Carnage (1984) Poster

(1984)

User Reviews

Review this title
28 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Carnage
Scarecrow-8813 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Andy Milligan schlockfest concerning newlyweds and their pals terrorized by the restless spirit of a murdered bride who wishes for those who occupy her humble abode to leave. This very disturbed ghost bride causes objects of all sorts to move, harm, and kill those who are in, or around, the home for which her husband blew her brains out before turning the gun on himself. Whether it be the newly hired maid or a pair of burglars who just so happen to pick the wrong house to attempt to rob, the bride will frighten and destroy you with whatever weapon might be at her disposal. Michael Chiodo and Leslie Den Dooven are the newlywed couple, The Hendersons, who fail to leave despite the weird goings-on(..such as a phonograph which plays the melody of "Here Comes the Bride.." over and over or home appliances and tea cups continuously moved around when their backs are turned)and this decision to stay, including a housewarming which leads to a friend slipping on a rug moved by the apparition with broken glass landing into her skin, opening a very bloody wound, and another pal taking a bath when a radio is thrown into the water electrocuting him, will yield repercussions. Like The Amityville Horror, The Hendersons, against obvious signs that something supernatural is present, remain while most of us would get a clue and head out of Dodge. Will The Hendersons be able to survive inside this haunted house or leave while the going's good?

Following the footsteps of Ed Wood, Al Adamson, and Hershell Gordon Lewis, Andy Milligan lends his support to the bad movie movement, writing, photographing and directing(..maybe he even catered for all we know)this flat, snail-paced, poorly performed disaster with hokey gore and poltergeist effects. A supposedly decapitated hand literally falls out of a shirt sleeve. You can tell that strings are pulling the objects which are supposed to move by themselves. The terror scenes which feature the ghost bride(..whose eyes are completely white, featuring blood on her wedding gown)popping up to freak out her victims are embarrassingly corny(..particularly the attack on the maid). As a horror film, this doesn't work at all, but as a comedy, unintentional or not(..I had a feeling, Milligan features quite a bit of intentional comedic haunt bits throughout, in particular the pranks the bride pulls on The Hendersons, hiding a notepad or hanging up a phone when a person was on the opposite line;even the scene where the bathing victim is electrocuted, he's singing to polka music from the very radio which ultimately kills him!)it often entertains. Milligan's cast resemble amateur actors who probably made appearances in a local theater or were friends of his. The practical effects often feature poor make-up, where the wounds are, with squirting blood. The film features amusing dialogue between characters conversing about trivial matters. There are conversations between a secondary character and her psychiatrist mom(..about a deteriorating marriage, and upcoming pregnancy)which has little to do with the major storyline...the relationship problems between Walter(John Garrit)and Susan(Deeann Veeder)which they share with moms takes up large portions of the film, probably servicing the film as filler, before they accept the dreaded housewarming invite from The Hendersons. I did particularly enjoy the banter between Carol's father and his meddlesome maid, Martha, who calls to her attention that the house might be haunted, with pops telling her to quit talking such nonsense..how aggrevated they are with each other. The film does feature melodrama which brings a rather surreal awkwardness when the graphic violence occurs..it was as if Milligan was attempting to make two films, and neither is very good! The characters featured in this film reminded me of those kooky relatives you love but often wish to avoid. The editing during the supernatural attacks will probably either induce groaning, pity, or laughter. Possibly features the worst decapitation ever produced and the flying hatchet which targets a priest(..not to mention the whole sequence where the spirits of Ann and Mark Webb cause a maelstrom with intent to harm the priest)will elicit certain chuckles. The scene where another robber is stuck in the throat with a pitchfork, containing a horribly executed "guts removal" will also tickle the funny bone of many. The ending, where the Webbs wish for The Hendersons to remain, provoking a possible "reinactment" of their demise, doesn't really make a hell of a lot of sense.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Shut your damn dog up!
BA_Harrison21 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Those who claim that this is director Andy Milligan's best movie aren't really saying much: it's still a terrible film, just not quite as bad as the rest of his bilge.

A cut-rate Amityville-style haunted house story, Carnage opens with the double suicide of newlyweds Susan and Mark Webb (Deeann Veeder and Chris Georges). Three years later and the Webb's house is bought by young married couple Jonathan and Carol Henderson (Michael Chiodo and Leslie Den Dooven) who are clearly unperturbed by the incessant barking of a neighbour's dog.

However, after much unexplained spooky shenanigans, mysterious deaths, and constant yapping from the mutt next door, Susan and Mark eventually come to the conclusion that buying the house was a bad idea. Getting a priest round to their gaff doesn't stop the supernatural occurrences, but at least the dog shuts up for a while.

With lousy acting from all involved, and special effects limited to objects being moved by wires (some of which are clearly visible) and a fair amount of hokey gore (including a really laughable disembowelment, a meat cleaver in the head and a blood-free decapitation), this woeful ghost flick is strictly for fans of really bad movies.

The film ends with the Henderson's joining their other-worldly housemates by also committing suicide, after which, that bloody dog starts barking again.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Andy Milligan's unconvincing supernatural chiller.
HumanoidOfFlesh13 January 2010
A newlywed couple moves into their new home and are ready to settle into their new life together.After settling in,the couple begins experiencing some strange occurrences in the home and discovers the truth behind them.It seems the former owners of the home were a newlywed couple that committed suicide years before and are now haunting the place.Extremely unconvincing and badly acted haunted house flick cheaply made by Andy Milligan.There is some disgusting gore including the scene of intestines being pulled out of a man's stomach as it is cut into with scissors.Only for fans of grindhouse trash.5 out of 10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not too bad Milligan cash-in of 'Amityville Horror'
rixrex20 August 2008
One of Andy Milligan's better efforts, this is basically a cash-in of Amityville Horror done in Milligan style, a low-budget production and a less slick but competent version.

That it is a cash-in is evident from the plot, religious icons, and specifically from the wholesale repeating of the infamous shot of the spooky Amityville house in ever-increasing zoom cuts used to emphasize the fact that it's a haunted house. However, this is done in an amateur style here.

Much else about the film is amateurish, but done with intensity so that it is enjoyable nonetheless. There's plenty of moments where you'd think a little bit more effort would have greatly improved the production, but then that would be hindsight. Who really knows what obstacles such a low-budget effort has except those involved? Acting is also typical of low-budget, though not without merit, especially the actress playing the Mother-in-Law, she's particularly good and attractive as well.

The gore quotient is fairly high, again done with minimal budget, so some effects are good and some are lesser. There's such items as hand chopped off, decapitation, disemboweling, stuff that was typical for the time. This can be gotten cheaply on a DVD from EastWest DVD as a double feature with Class Reunion Massacre, also a very decent low-budget shocker that has gained a cult status, so it's a DVD worth getting.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Scary furniture!!!
Red-Barracuda12 November 2010
I bet this film had a great poster. They must've spent the money on something.

This is an ultra-cheap knockoff of films like The Amityville Horror and Poltergeist. It's about a newly-wed couple who move into a new house in which the previous tenants – another newly-wed couple – died in a sort of suicide pact. It's not exactly like this is an original concept. The problem Carnage has primarily is that its ambition vastly outstrips its budget and talent. There are many, many ghostly occurrences depicted but 90% of them seem to be bits of furniture and gardening equipment moving slightly. Scary kettle! Scary paper! Scary candle! It's basically atrocious. There are a few gore scenes spliced into the story to liven things up but they are not exactly convincing; especially the scene where the burglar is disembowelled – his guts looks suspiciously like Chinese noodles. None of this would matter so much but the pacing of the film is bad and the overall effect is one of boredom.

It's difficult to recommend this unfortunately.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Bride Wears Red
wes-connors7 July 2009
"A newlywed couple moves into their new home and are ready to settle into their new life together. After settling in, the couple begins experiencing some strange occurrences in the home, and discovers, to their horror, the truth behind them. It seems the former owners of the home were a newlywed couple that committed suicide years before, and are now haunting the place," according to the DVD sleeve's synopsis. That the other couple committed suicide in the house is certainly no surprise. In fact, there is no suspense to speak of, in "Carnage". The film is simply a series of gory deaths, around the house… while a dog barks, indecently, outside… Not only does the couple NOT leave the haunted house, they invite other couples to join in the fun. Do not watch this movie without having other things around, to help pass the time.

* Carnage (1984) Andy Milligan ~ Leslie Den Dooven, Michael Chiodo, Deeann Veeder, John Garitt
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bad Real Estate Investment!
Hitchcoc10 November 2009
Yes, it's that bad. This carries the usual idiotic premise that no matter how many awful things take place, you stay in the house. Some movies would make this interesting, but this is absolutely terrible. Friends come and die. Relatives come and die. Things move. Gas gets turned on at night. People fall on broken glass. Old crappy radios fall in a three foot bathtub while a guy is taking a bath. A minister gets a meat cleaver in the head. These two suicide victims are haunting the house. They are constantly getting in the way. They have that Beetlejuice thing going to some extent. They are attracted to the people they are torturing. Anyway, there's no end to the suffering, not of the people in the house, but of the people who saw this movie. Avoid at all costs. It's not even campy.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
It has its...moment
Sandcooler18 July 2016
Andy Milligan might be some kind of legend within the exploitation genre, but this off-brand version of "Poltergeist" doesn't really provide any so-bad-it's-good moments. It really only has one scene that it worth your time and money. The scene where one of the ghosts disembowels the burglar is incredibly cheesy and thus incredibly entertaining, mainly because his 'guts' are very clearly spaghetti. The movie has more gore than that (and one surprisingly bloodless decapitation), but that scene really sticks out. Most of this movie is just dreadfully boring. I know "Poltergeist" also got most of its suspense from shutting doors and moving objects, but that movie had a director who knew what he was doing. Milligan apparently saw "Poltergeist" and figured 'that doesn't look difficult', only to prove that it's extremely difficult. It also doesn't help that his actors are all well below porn standards. Hell, some of the men even have failed attempts at porn moustaches. None of these people ever appeared in something else, and you immediately understand why. "Carnage" is obviously a quick cash-in, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't at least try to go for something entertaining.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A very tedious haunted house clunker
Woodyanders16 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Newlywed couple Carol and Johnathan purchase a house that turns out to be haunted by the unrestful ghosts of a previous married pair who committed suicide in said abode.

Writer/director Andy Milligan not only lets the dull and hackneyed story plod along at a painfully lethargic pace, but also crucially fails to generate any essential tension or spooky atmosphere. Moreover, the uneven acting is decidedly hit or miss, although Michael Chiodo and Leslie Van Dooven are likeable enough as our imperiled protagonists. The shoddy (less than) special effects are a really sorry sight to behold, with moving objects often manipulated onscreen by obvious clearly seen wires. The gore f/x are likewise extremely hokey and unconvincing. Some fairly exciting last reel action proves to be a case of too little too late. A total snorefest.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Z" Haunted House Fun. Better Than I Guessed.
Rainey-Dawn9 September 2017
Amityville Horror "Z" grade rip-off, but it's fun! Really, the film is just terrible but it really does have it's moments, a few funny lines between characters, and it takes itself seriously without over doing it with seriousness.

I really expected this one to have me rolling my eyes at the stupidity - but instead I was able to kick back and enjoy the movie. It's awful but in a good way. I find that my favorite characters are both of the parents of the couple living in the house... they are quite a trip to watch, funny.

The movie is really only worth a 4 at best - but I did like it quite a bit and had fun watching so I have to give it a 6 out of 10 stars.

6/10
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
horrible
hangsheep200415 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Spoiler I am surprised that this movie got 2.1/10, it should not! This is horrible!!!!!!! Why did Andy Milligan make this crap? This movie begins with two newlywed couples killing each other shortly being married. Then sometime later another newlywed couple move into the house. They invite some friends over, who themselves will be married. Then the fun begins, people start dying or getting seriously hurt. The couple find out that the previous owners committed double suicide and that the house is haunted. So they with the urging of the previous owners' ghosts kill themselves.

This movie was low budget, like Milligan's other films, one can easily tell. No creatvity substituted for lack of money, a plot that makes no sense and goes no one. The special effects are cheap and amateurish. why make a horror movie with effects when you don't have money to make at least decent attempts at it? Lack of money means you have to be more creative than the average filmmaker, unfortunately Milligan was not. This movie is so bad they do not even sell it in many places. Look out Plan 9 from outer Space, look out Manos, Hands of Fate, you have a contender for worst picture of all time. Carnage has that potential, the only potential it has.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Definitely Unique
jpfalcon200322 November 2023
For the budget this film had to work with, I think they did a really great job. It would be nice to see this film remastered even if it were just on DVD, but a bluray would be nice. It was filmed in widescreen. Some gore looks fine, some looks fake. Looks like a couple scenes were one take only, because of lack of budget, nut it's still a fun time for a watch. I love how when the tools and other items make the window squeegy sounds when they move. The gore scene with the housekeeper is a little over the top, but probably the best one of the bunch. This film is unrated for gore. The best copy of Carnage I've seen, is on a horror multipack put out by Mill Creek. Funeral home is on that pack as well, which is the best copy I've ever seen.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Grade "Z"
CMRKeyboadist12 September 2006
I should start by saying that "Carnage" was my introduction into Andy Milligan films. Not only are his films just terrible, but they are actually a lot of fun to watch, if you can get yourself prepared for them. "Carnage' is definitely no different. With some of the worst acting and special effects ever, I found quite a lot to like about this grade "Z" film.

The story starts with a couple living in a somewhat mansion. Something terrible has happened as they both kill each other in a loving? embrace. A year passes and the house is sold to a newly wed couple. Instantly, things aren't how they should be as objects move by themselves. Things start out on the subtle side but then get worse as people start dying. Some in rather gruesome form.

This is probably the worst haunted house movie ever made. The objects that move around are obviously used by strings and the sort. But that isn't what makes the special effects so bad. There is a few scenes that are in question here. Example: two burglars brake into the basement of the house in the middle of the night. When weird things start happening, one of the burglars starts climbing out of a window. An axe floats towards his hand and hits him with just the handle. Magically, his hand falls off in a bloody mess. Also, a scene where a priest is running out of the house and a butcher knife hits him in the shoulder, the next scene the butcher knife is in his head. This is the type of silliness you see in the movie.

The acting is pretty boring. I don't know if this is the actors fault as they weren't given much to work with and let's face it, Andy Milligan is just not a good director. Anyone acting under his directing is not going to exactly shine. It is this problem that makes the movie mostly slow and uninteresting if you aren't ready for it.

Altogether, this was a bad movie. It doesn't mean it wasn't fun, it was just bad. It is the type of film you get some friends together with and watch to crack jokes with. 6/10
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Sell the house
nogodnomasters17 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
A married couple moves into a house where a married couple had killed themselves. The place is haunted with low budget effects that lack any scare. The acting was not good....to be kind. Has some camp/ MST-3000 value.

No swearing, sex, or nudity.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
paltrygeist.
EyeAskance7 November 2003
This invidious little soup-kitchen spook show opens with a newlywed couple's grisly murder/suicide scene, then shifts to the sale of their home. The new inhabitants are quite possibly the least expressive actors I have ever witnessed in any realm of theater, and their pea-brained characters steadfastly refuse to vacate the house, instead opting to sit around waiting for more freaky things to take place(of course, if characters in films of this type were at all humanly intelligent, then most flicks in the genre would be the length of a TV commercial).

Nothing even remotely scary takes place in CARNAGE(unless the sight of electrical appliances turning on happens to freeze your blood), and a modicum of workaday gore effects appears to be the contingent highlight of this discreditable supernatural scramble. For Andy Milligan masochists only, but frankly, his endearing monogram touches are only scantly evident here.

3.5/10
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Milligans' schlock
trashgang23 January 2011
I guess that I don't have to introduce Andy Milligan. He's the king of the drive-in's and schlockfests. This flick is one of his later attempts but is still an ultra low budget. It contains wooden acting and bad editing. Almost none of the actors made it into another film, do I have to say more. And for a flick from 1984 it's really slow, made me think I was watching a sixties exploitation. The effects used, if you can say that, are really no-budget effects. Windows closing itself, things dropping or moving, disappearing tools, you know, wired stuff. You can easily see that there wasn't money for extra lights. The just used the light on the camera. If you still don't know what I mean just watch after 30 minutes how a knife goes into a hand, OMG. It's a typical Milligan flick but in some ways it's watchable. But still you will have big laugh, just take a look at the ghost appearing, all done by editing like they did with the flicks from the 30's! It's all done so cheap. Suddenly, by editing, someone sees a ghost in a mirror, but you can easily see that she stands in the room. Here and there it's okay, like the throat slicing and the slaughtering of the burglars but overall, it's a Milligan schlock. Just take it as it is.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Lazy Haunted House Flick
juderussell-840949 January 2022
A newlywed couple moves into a haunted manor that's possessed by the spirit of a dead bride and groom.

Andy Milligan tries his hand at doing something along the lines of Poltergeist or The Amityville Horror and it's about as inept as you'd expect with nothing close to resembling tension, scares, or dialogue that moves the plot forward. It just sits there, not doing much of anything.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Unique, right!
BandSAboutMovies21 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Starting with a murder/suicide, Carnage is about love. Three years later in the same house as that tragedy, Carol (Leslie Den Dooven) and Jonathan Henderson (Michael Chiodo) move in. They got the house for cheap and they even threw in the furniture. There's even a photo of the last occupants, which is yanked somehow out of Jonathan's hands.

I'm excited to report that while this can be seen as an Amityville Horror rip-off, it's still an Andy Milligan movie because the main theme is that every single married couple is a mess. Walter (John Garrit) and Caol's sister Susan (Deeann Veeder) only argue more than Susan and her mother (Che Moody) who also wants to sleep with Walter. Meanwhile, we learn that the house is haunted by the couple from the beginning, but again, that's just second place to the fact that no two human beings can be in a relationship without screaming at one another.

There are so many people in this movie to the point that you'll wonder why there just keep adding people. That's because this will eventually have a body count and if you were also asking yourself or God or whoever you ask things about, maybe the ghost of Milligan, "Will there be a pitchfork impalement?" Yes, why wouldn't there be? That's like going to see a band that refuses to play its greatest hit.

This is a movie that feels like no one cared in front of or behind the camera. It goes on and on, talking and talking, and yet there's something to admire that this is a haunted house movie more devoted to long toasts or dialogue between people who don't matter to the main story. It's like if some college filmmaker got hired to make Poltergeist and Spielberg didn't interfere and that student didn't show up but sent their girlfriend who hates horror movies and she just wanted to be done with the whole thing.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The Staten Island Horror
NoDakTatum10 October 2023
Andy "Acquired Taste" Milligan has a beautiful setting for this haunted house thriller- his own house. The rest of the film? Lousy. Married couple Carol (Leslie Den Dooven) and Johnathan (Michael Chiodo) get a creaky old house with all the furnishings very cheap, not knowing that three years prior, the original owners Susan (Deeann Veeder) and Mark (Chris Georges) had committed suicide there in the film's opening minutes. Strange things begin to happen as items are moved around and misplaced, harmless things until Carol is cut by a kitchen knife. Soon, the ghosts begin killing people who enter the house.

Unlike the other Milligan films I have seen in the past ("Bloodthirsty Butchers," "The Rats are Coming! The Werewolves are Here!"), "Carnage" is unforgivably BORING. The bad filmmaking is something to behold, as you hear the floors creak, see string tied around objects so they can move "on their own," and marvel at the terrible performances and insipid screenplay (all these killings and blood, yet not a single cop is called?). Supporting characters are introduced with no idea about who they are in relation to the main couple. One actress has her hair up in a towel for her introductory scene, so I didn't recognize her later once she was dressed. Check out the flabby guy who needs to take a waterless bath in his underwear, twice, before dying. The climax makes no sense whatsoever, I'd suggest a remake using the basic plot but this story has been done a million times before, and better. Some of the blood-spurting gore is alright. According to the Trivia section on IMDb, the house this was shot in burned down shortly after production. That's a shame, it was the star of the film.

Contains physical violence, brief gun violence, gore, mild profanity, adult situations, alcohol use.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I liked it, but I've seen other Milligan films, too...
keith-712-38346818 October 2010
I've seen a lot of Andy Milligan movies, and I think this is one of his most accomplished and coherent. Sure it's a lot like other haunted house films of the early 80s, but there have been haunted house films since the dawn of cinema, and there's enough oddness--not typical Milligan oddness but interesting oddness--that I found it compelling enough to stick with it to the predictable end. As for the acting, not bad for a Milligan film, and I actually found the characters likable, though I missed some of Milligan's long-time collaborators. For being made for 35K, this is certainly one of Andy's better looking films, too. Then there are those moments of hysteria that only Milligan could muster. I give the guy a lot of credit: He had a certain skewed vision that he kept training a camera on for quite a long time. Not for everyone, but then Staten Island is an acquired taste on so many levels. On a Milligan scale of 1-10, definitely a 6.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Andy Milligan making a (relatively) normal film, results are mixed
Bloodwank13 March 2011
Andy Milligan made a lot of films about hate. Ugly hateful people blowing hot sick winds of hate at each other through two bit sets with a side order of chintz-gore. I have a lot of time for his schtick, though it is an acquired taste. Carnage sets off on a different track though, its a film about love. Love of people, love of people for a house, a love that transcends death. And nothing says love like an opening sequence murder suicide wedding! Can you feel it?! So we got a lovely young couple dead before the title flashes up, and once it does their unfortunate marital home gets a couple of new tenants, an instantly agreeable pair of newlyweds by the name of Carol and Jonathan. Easy going ordinary folk lightly essayed by one shotters Leslie Den Dooven and Michael Chiodo, they reel in the audience by a sheer force of normality and when things start to go awry its hard not to wish them the best. And things go awry a-plenty, from household objects acting of their own accord (pretty much anything not nailed down in this place gets to misbehave) to a number of amusing bloody deaths. Milligan was working with a higher budget than the majority of his films, as a result Carnage generally looks professional or at least semi professional and the setting is a plus, a nice old building with the right kind of homely atmosphere to be usurped by spooky goings on. Some of the shocks are quite neat as well, with one throat slash death that actually comes off effectively bloody and well handled. For those put off by the idea of Andy Milligan making a normal film, there is still a bit of weirdness and ineptitude to chew on. For one, there are a few scenes where the lighting kinda sucks, also some of the deaths are pretty silly. One in particular is impressively ludicrous, in which it transpires that the human intestine is in fact made of a noodle like substance. Take that biology lessons! There's a fair amount of filler as well, inconsequential characters getting more screen time and development than needed, including some thoroughly charming scenes involving a young lady bickering with her tough cookie (but good hearted and helpful) mother. Yep, a nice mom in a Milligan film! There's even a nice priest as well! Luckily the actors are all amateurs so the film never gets into genuinely dramatic territory, it just comes across as quaint and funny. And although sinister at times, the supernatural shenanigans are also pretty funny. Sadly the film does lose quite a lot of interest in trying to be normal, it doesn't work very well on normal terms because the pace is too slow and the execution too shonky, it also has little sense of character. I was never bored which is a definite plus, but on the other hand its rarely all that inspiring. I guess only 80's trash completists or Milligan addicts will ever care about this one and on those levels it serves its purpose, but I wouldn't dream of recommending it to anyone else. See it if you have to, but not an essential I'd say.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
B-Maniac's Paradise
No Nukes10 March 2002
I love Carnage. When I picked it up at a flea market I was a bit leery of it because the box touted itself as a horror/comedy. It couldn't be further from the truth...it's a quite serious horror film, the only thing that will induce chuckles is the outlandishly silly special effects (so silly, in fact, it looks almost as if it were made to look cheap on purpose). Bad acting, dorky-looking ghosts, possessed household appliances, skitzophenic mother-in-laws and lotsa lotsa blood n' guts equals one hell of a good B-movie session. The ending reminded me of the one from VIDEODROME somehow. No idea why, though.

Very hard to find, but worth every second of the search for addicts of horrible cinema such as myself.

-No Nukes, the Satanic Pikachu Pika pikaaaaa pika pi chipa pikaCHUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!! (stay cool, surf well, watch lots! pikaCHUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!)
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Low-budget retro charm
thomas-4083 September 2023
Yes, this movie is really bad. Awful, wooden acting. "Special effects" strings pulling at objects. An ax flies through the air and "chops off" a woman's head (but it looks like the ax was held offscreen and used to knock off a mannequin's head).

Yet Carnage has a definite Z movie charm.

I especially love that it's set in the New York City area. Watching this film, I'm wondering, was this house located in Queens, Staten Island, Nassau County?

I lived in the NYC area in the 1980s, and seeing the streets and cars brings back memories of my youth.

I saw this film on an old VHS tape. The images are washed out and grainy, yet that only adds to the film's low-budget, retro charm.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Trite horror opus
lor_4 March 2023
My review was written in April 1986 after watching the movie on Media Home Entertainment video cassette.

"Carnage" is an old-hat, poorly made horror picture, shot in New York in 1983 under the title "Hell House". Filmmaker Andy Milligan, whose heyday was about 15 years earlier with pics like "The Ghastly Ones", delivers pure corn here and the feature went directly to home video without a domestic theatrical release.

Leslie Den Dooven and Michael Chiodo portray newlyweds Carol and Jonathan who move into a bargain house (a la "The Money Pit") where three years earlier a groom killed his bride and then committed suicide. Of course the site is haunted by that couple and many visitors are killed in gory fashion while inanimate objects move around amid other supernatural happenings.

For unexplained reasons, Carol and Jonathan love the house and won't leave no matter what mayhem occurs. Not surprisingly, they also become eternal residents. Picture is padded with inconsequential footage and a boring subplot involving a pregnant friend of theirs, Ann (Chris Baker) whose marriage is on the rocks.

Gore is exaggerated and phony, while special effects shots are amateurish. Milligan's use of a background score made up of library music makes the film seem at least 20 years older than its copyright date.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I liked the ending
marymorrissey5 June 2007
I was on amazon.com and read about some bio of the director that is supposed to be quite fascinating and can be bought for .01 evidently he was important to starting off Broadway as he made films for 42nd street theatres. this was last night then I found this with another movie on one DVD at the 99 cents only store, so I knew I was fated to watch.

this movie was cute, gets a little dull after awhile but . . I did quite like the ending!

it's important to give 10 lines of text. Well, it should have been the husband shown in the opening scene who was eventually to be nude and without clothing in the raw as it were.

-------------

it's funny how the film boldly commits errors but then parts of it are very competently shot, when the people are looking around in the house of doom.

---------

in the soundtrack there is a loop of a barking dog that is played 3 times in succession, then there is a variation like a little bit of it is cut out and this "big phrase" ends by starting again. This cycle repeats maybe 8-10 times when employed, becoming a sort of a pure vibration a kind of incantation of mood, "ARF ARF ARF! ARF!! (pause) ARF!! (pause) ARF!! (pause)" rather like morse code are this particular hounds utterances. The filmmakers get away with it partly cause dogs are often quite repetitive in their barking. there almost seems to be dog sentence structure, from the sound of it, and I couldn't help wondering if it might be possible that dogs borrow their "cadences" from humans. after all it's usually humans they are barking at. But only in the most lassie like extremities, really, maybe only on TV, in face, do dogs use barking as a means of communication with their masters, it's whining that's commonly done. What I'm saying is, if dogs were imitating conversation then maybe they'd be liable to join into human conversations by barking along, but this doesn't happen. anyway I was glad to have watched the movie for putting my mind onto this subject of the structure, grammar, or just rhythm of dog barking.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed