8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Prometheus (I) (2012)
7/10
Flawed, but spellbinding
31 May 2012
I was fortunate enough to grab seats to see Prometheus in IMAX 3D at the Metrocentre in Gateshead for the opening midnight screening last night.This is the first feature film I have seen in IMAX 3D, and I should start by saying that the 3D was actually a lot less obtrusive than in other recent releases films. It may not have added much to the experience, it didn't bother me either. From a technical aspect this is one of the best Sci-Fi films I have seen in a long time, with stunning visuals many of which were shot in stark, earthly landscapes such as Iceland and the Isle of Skye, but which both Ridley Scott and cinematographer Dariusz Wolski manage to make seem brilliantly ethereal and extraterrestrial. All other technical aspects of the film are wonderful.

As far as the story, script and acting goes, most initial reviews that I have read seem incredibly divided, but I was largely impressed. I think Rapace and Fassbender were both highly commendable in their respective roles as the curious, eager scientist with a strong survival instinct and the mild-mannered, mysterious and yet unpredictable and slightly sinister android. Theron and Elba are satisfying in their roles as the icy corporate overseer and droll ship's captain, but the rest of the cast were largely forgettable as cannon fodder. While it certainly lacks the characterisation and naturalistic feel which Alien had, I believe the two films set out to achieve very different things and do them very well; Alien was a much more low-key, personal thriller which focused on character development to create tension, whereas Prometheus focuses on grandeur and spectacle to create awe and adventure. From a story point of view, there are a couple of moments which retrospectively don't make sense, but I found most of these easy to overlook at the time and they really don't bother me too much.

I would also go so far as to say that Prometheus works better as a horror film than Alien did; Alien never repulsed me especially as I knew what was coming due to heavy exposure, but the horror in Prometheus, while strongly reminiscent of the subliminal themes of sex, fear of pregnancy and rape which were strongly implied in Alien (albeit shown in a more overt way in this film), was done in a fresh and surprisingly disturbing way which did repulse me, and I don't say that very often about horror films. I feel that the horror in Alien, while iconic, is not nearly as agonising as it is in Prometheus, as the characters suffer for a short period of time in Alien.

Finally from a philosophical point of view, many have complained that Prometheus raises more questions than it does answer them. I think it, along with a little prior knowledge of the Alien franchise and what Scott originally intended it to be, allows the viewer to construct their own thoughts and conclusions whilst leaving a little open for debate and contemplation should another film be created. For instance, the question which keeps coming up is "why?". Well I have my own answers which I was able to make based on what I saw and what I already knew had been speculated about the origins of the Space Jokeys and the mythology of the Alien franchise in general. Furthermore, as a fan of the original Alien, I felt extremely satisfied by how they tied in a lot of the elements to the original film, and am willing to see how Scott chooses to expand on this story, as there are lot of ways it can be done.

On the whole, not a film for everyone, and it will divide opinions, but I really liked it. Is it as groundbreaking as Bladerunner or Alien or any of the classic Sci-Fi epics? No, but I do think that it will be remembered as one of the best Sci-Fi films of its time, and easily as Scott's best film since Gladiator. I gave it 9/10 initially due to the sheer enormity and breathtaking beauty of the world which Scott created. Having had time to ponder some of the flaws, which are evident but did not bother me as much as in other films, I will give it 8/10 (maybe 8.5 if I'm feeling generous), but I would still highly recommend it and put it in the list of best films of 2012 (so far).
18 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the best docudramas ever made
12 April 2007
Who says British special effects are complete rubbish? To be fair they are generally, but this is one of the better dramas in terms of... well... everything! The effects are pretty good (OK, their not spectacular, but at least the director hasn't put too much emphasis on them), very good acting, but the thing I really like about this is the Soundtrack; perfect for the story! The way to make a good docudrama is to focus on the stories of the people who experienced it, translate these with famous actors, and use an effective backdrop to aid the story, and that's just what Krakatoa: The Last Days has done. Forget all that glossy, expensive Hollywood rubbish; this is how a docudrama should be made! 9/10
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
E.T. (1982)
10/10
Unmatched, Unmastered, Spielberg's Masterpiece
29 March 2007
The first time I ever watched this film was at the age of 5, on a dark and stormy night having just got back from Wales. My dad first introduced me to film with the words, "Son, I have a film for you to watch. It is a film about a man from outer space!" And since then, E.T. has been stuck in my head, for all the wrong reasons! The first time Elliot sees E.T. in the Cornfield was a scene that would become my worst nightmare for 10 years. The matter wasn't helped when British Telecommications used it as their advertising slogan several years ago. However, since Christmas 2006, when it was last broadcast here in the UK, I have been in awe of this film! I see now that it was a beautifully made story of love, compassion, friendship (and deeper meanings such as racial equality and biblical references), and not a horror film which, to my mind, would surpass the Alien movies. The acting is very good for a kids film (which I usually look upon with utter distaste), and certainly, I don't think there has been a decent film about "good" Aliens since (apart from maybe the rather overlooked "Cocoon"). I have heard of people who believe that you have to be an child to like this film and that it is completely overrated. I say "Bollocks!" True you need a certain amount of imagination to look at this film and understand its subliminal meanings and its homage to childhood nostalgia, but the way I see it, to look at this film with such prejudice, distasteful comments is to deny the bliss of a typical childhood altogether. You do not even have to be philosophical to enjoy this film either. Its comic values are high, especially with the inventions of colourful insults such as "Penis breath", which some of my friends still use today, the score is one of William's finest, and the general use of "Mis-en-scene" is inventive and highly affective. I honestly don't see what people have against the 2002 edition, because Spielberg only wanted to make E.T.'s expressions more real, and to try and tackle the issue of a post 9/11 World. But I can seriously say that since that night 10 years ago, I really have been turned for the better. Basically completely flawless - 10/10.

P.S. Why the hell is this not in the IMDb top 250!!!?
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Apollo 13 (I) (1995)
10/10
Excellent film (even with goofs)
1 January 2007
"Houston, we have a problem"; the biggest misquote in cinematic history no less, but for all the right reasons. Apollo 13 has to be one of my favourite films of all time.

It is amazing how things always seem to be much longer you are young. I first saw the movie when I was about 6 or 7 and it seemed to go on for much longer than, but I was still gripped. The acting is very good, with Tom Hanks, Bill Paxton and Kevin Bacon in the centre of it all, giving life to the situation that they are in. The visual effects were awesome, and even to this day they still look good, and the fact that for the zero gravity scenes, they really went up in a "vommit comet" (the same aircraft training scheme that the real astronauts used, and still use for the astronaut training program!) However, the film is brimming with factual errors and anachronisms, which most people find intolerable; TV programs that appear on screens throughout the movie that don't actually appear until after or before April 1970; Lunar errors (give me a viewing of E.T. any day!) and props that didn't appear until after the incident e.g. coffee mugs, beetles albums and other items. However, it is only a Ron Howard film, what can you do?

However, this is made up for with the good acting, brilliant visual effects and brilliant score (composed by James Horner, who I think, next to John Williams and the late Jerry Goldsmith, is the one of the best movie composers). A brilliant "historical" adaptation (in terms of drama and acting). 8/10
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Casino Royale (2006)
8/10
Quite confusing in places, but possibly the best "Bond" film ever!
31 December 2006
I am not an avid fan of the James Bond franchise, so when I went to see the film just before Christmas, I didn't know what to expect. The critics were raving about this film (spearheaded by British celebrity Jonathan Ross) and rightly so.

You could say the whole business about "restarting" the Bond franchise was a good idea; after the masterful Sean Connery left the series, it began to go downhill with every film filled with clichés and very predictable plots (the franchise was saved, possibly, by Pierce Brosnan in Goldeneye). It needed a knew start. I was still a bit confused about the character Felix Leiter returning, and the marketing slogan "Bond's first adventure", when I discovered that everything was modern and the film was set in the present day. But the knew Bond (Finally another English Bond!), Daniel Craig is brilliant. He is much more grittier and ruthless than all the other Bond actors put together, who mostly deliver their performances with predictable one-liners and by waving their Walter PPKs around in a "threatening" way without actually using them (the Kate Beckinsale quote "I think if you're going to kill someone, kill them, don't stand there talking about it all day!" {Van Helsing}). He is a very good actor and plays Bond with Gusto (on top of that, I don't agree with, or care about any of the crap the press have made about him). The Bond girl, Eva Green, is okay, with a more reluctant approach towards Bond, and the villain is good (Mads Mikklesen, who should have kept his real name for the character!). Judi Dench delivers an excellent performance as ever.

The plot is admittedly a bit advanced (this could be a good thing however) and you do begin to wonder who is killing who, but if there is one thing that makes this film stand out above all other Bond films (in this case, only matched by Goldeneye) it's the action. The action sequences are first rate! It may stand out above all other Bond films to the point where it isn't actually a Bond film any more, Daniel Craig may have mixed views from the press, and although it isn't my favourite film, it is still a bloody good one. Daniel Craig is certainly the best Bond since Sean Connery, and it could, just possibly, be the best Bond film ever! 8/10.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Funny as Hell!
27 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Film spoofs don't get much ruder, cruder and funnier than this! Puppet sex, stereotypical Americans and underdog foreigners (fortunately and surprisingly, no insults poked at the British {Yeah!}). However, I think it starts off great with the Paris fight scene (especially when they just randomly fire a missile at the Eiffel Tower, which crushes the Arc De Triomphe in the process!), but by the time we got to the fight scene in Kim Jong Il's palace, the humour had gone a bit rusty (apart from when Kim Jong Il impales himself on the Kaiser's helmet; quality!). Nonetheless, definitely worth watching if you want a good laugh and a chance to poke fun at terrorism, world affairs and North Korea! 8/10! F*CK YEAH!!!!!!!!!!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aliens (1986)
9/10
Powerful, tense, action-packed (even humorous) - a true sci-fi classic (however, not a true horror classic; that rests with ALIEN)
25 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
A long battle (it seems) has raged between ALIEN fans as to whether Alien or Aliens should take the title as the best Alien film. I have seen every Alien film except the first one and I honestly think that so far, Aliens is a true classic (no offence Alien fans, I'm not trying to be prejudice).

As many of you know, Ripley, having spent 57 years in Hypersleep is found and awoken, but is disgusted to find that no-one believes her story! However, when the planet that she visited in Alien (now colonised by man) once again becomes hunting territory for the big drooling monsters (who subsequently munch on all the residents, save one), Ripley discovers that the only way to conquer her fear is to go back to the planet and confront it head on. With a bunch of foul-mouthed, "badass" marines, who blast everything in site to bits, and the ultra cool android Bishop, Ripley goes back to the planet, loaded with weapons (and later on, maternal passion). Surely all will go to plan...

James Cameron gave many people a chance to show different sides to their reputations if they were veteran actors, or show what they were made of if they were new, and many of the actors featured here (or in Terminator) became some of Cameron's favourites (step forward Michael Biehn {Terminator and Terminator 2 Judgement Day (Special Edition)}, Lance Henrikson {Terminator}, Bill Paxton {Terminator, Titanic} and Jenette Goldstein {Terminator 2 Judgement Day, Titanic}). Some were buffed up {Weaver, Goldstein}, some were slimy (Reiser), some were mellow (Henrikson, Biehn) and some were scene stealer's (Paxton). All in all, brilliant acting, great special effects (for 1986, especially the fight with the Queen) and an Action/Sci-Fi masterpiece. There is only one problem; not scary enough for a horror sequel (I know I haven't seen the first one but I know the plot inside out). Certainly it is tense in some places, but the "horror" is a bit predictable. 9/10 (one mark off for lack of decent horror).
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Bloody amazing! An excellent film
24 December 2006
I never really got off on this film until first saw it whilst on holiday in a hotel in New York. I didn't get off on it at first but then my parents bought it on DVD. I saw it again and I just couldn't take my mind off it!

Hopkins is delicious as Hannibal Lector with his amazing acting and brilliantly menacing speeches. You can't help that there is a monster just waiting to appear from Hopkins. I just couldn't help laughing with amazement. However, one of the biggest breakthroughs of the movie is probably Ted Levine as Jame Gumb (Buffalo Bill), playing the main psychotic serial killer. He has a way of playing the part that you is so mad that it is excellent.

Despite this, I don't really understand or believe the stories of people fainting in the cinema at the film's release in 1991. It is a horror, yes, but not a film worth having a nervous breakdown. Even so, it is and excellent piece of acting and film making, a great way to start the 90's; 10/10!
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed