Why was this film made? I'm sure the filmmakers, including the writer who brought us the equally dark "Seven", would argue that this is a serious film about the nature of an average man's encounter with absolute evil. They would probably argue the film explores the various faces of evil, from evil for it's own sake (Machine - a torturer in s&m films who finds his true thrill is to cross over into murder), to a mad director who sees his evil as art, to a porn producer and rich man's lawyer whose lust for money allows them to justify anything. And, finally, the rich pillar of the community who commissions a snuff film "because he could".
And let's give the filmmakers the nod that the film is powerfully acted by the entire cast, the directing is brooding and ominous. But ultimately the film fails mightily, as it tries to have it both ways. Condemning pornography, the film is pornographic. Condemning misogeny, the film depicts the most gruesome torture and degradation of women I have ever seen in a film. The film can't have it both ways. It could have conveyed the horrors of its subject with reaction shots by the hero, which it does repeatedly and effectively, without always showing the viewer the gratuitous subject matter itself. It chooses not to, and by so doing winds up in the same gutter it says it condemns. Thirty years ago the film "Judgment at Nuremberg" asked the same questions as this film. It answered them in an uplifting, thought provoking way. "8mm" opts to revel in the very exploitation it would want you to believe it condemns. And for that, it fails.
And let's give the filmmakers the nod that the film is powerfully acted by the entire cast, the directing is brooding and ominous. But ultimately the film fails mightily, as it tries to have it both ways. Condemning pornography, the film is pornographic. Condemning misogeny, the film depicts the most gruesome torture and degradation of women I have ever seen in a film. The film can't have it both ways. It could have conveyed the horrors of its subject with reaction shots by the hero, which it does repeatedly and effectively, without always showing the viewer the gratuitous subject matter itself. It chooses not to, and by so doing winds up in the same gutter it says it condemns. Thirty years ago the film "Judgment at Nuremberg" asked the same questions as this film. It answered them in an uplifting, thought provoking way. "8mm" opts to revel in the very exploitation it would want you to believe it condemns. And for that, it fails.
Tell Your Friends