A Family Man (2016) Poster

(2016)

User Reviews

Review this title
72 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Formulaic Sobstory Has Its Moments
lavatch30 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"A Family Man" juggles two realities of the hard-driving headhunter Dane Jensen at work in a cutthroat business world in contrast to his struggles in maintaining the semblance of family life as a devoted husband and dad. When his son develops cancer, Dane's life changes as he learns lessons about his workaholic lifestyle.

Much of the action is predictable, and much of the dialogue sounds scripted, as opposed organically deriving from character and situation. When an angry Dane berates his wife Elise in front a large family gathering at Thanksgiving, he broadcasts to the entire group that he "plays Santa Claus 365 days a year" and that Elise takes for granted his hard work and income derived from his grueling telemarketing exploits. Some of the dialogue even seems difficult to take seriously by the characters themselves, as serious conversations typically end on a comic note.

The roles of the husband and wife are well-performed by Gerard Butler and Gretchen Mol. There is also a sensitive performance the actor playing in the kind doctor. Alfred Molina is outstanding as the unemployed engineer Louis William Wheeler. Lou's reaction in the bathroom to the news of his new job is priceless.

An interesting part of the film was the little boy's fascination with the architecture of Chicago and his bonding with his dad when they visit five of the famous buildings. Those sites included The Rookery, The Tribune Tower, The Jay Pritzker Pavilion, The Wrigley Building, and Frank Lloyd Wright's Thomas Gale House. But once again, the dialogue sounded artificial as the father and son rattle off history lessons during their visits to the various buildings.

"A Family Man" is a workmanlike film that cobbles together traditional elements of the film melodrama. But it does not transcend the limitations of that genre in shedding significant light on the pressures of succeeding in business and family simultaneously.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Uneven story and unsympathetic characters
phd_travel1 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
There is a message - it's karma. What goes around comes around. As a headhunter he did bad things to get the numbers at work for example using middle aged Alfred Molina instead of getting him a job. He didn't spend enough time with his family. Then his kid gets sick with leukemia and he eventually does the right thing and voila his kid gets better and he lands on his feet. It's a preachy message and too simplistic.

Some faults in this movie: Gretchen Mol plays his rather ungrateful wife. Bitching about his hours when he is trying to provide for his family. So even when her kid gets sick she doesn't seem sympathetic. In fact it's one of the least moving sick kid dramas on film.

The world of head hunting is something you don't see on screen that much and kind of doubt it's that cutthroat.

Gerard Butler has a bad accent - he shouldn't play an American in movies. Alison Brie is wasted as his out of place pretty rival colleague. Willem Dafoe is the big boss who is kind of a one dimensional horrible boss.

Not a must watch.
29 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
There's nothing terribly exciting about it, with the creative bar set that low
kaptenvideo-898751 August 2017
Ah, the new movie starring Gerard Butler, the poor man's Clive Owen, always up for some good all-American entertainment that makes you think but also makes you smile. This one's about a headhunter whose life revolves around closing deals in survival-of-the-fittest boiler room. He battles his top rival for control of the company, but then his oldest child falls seriously ill. Also starring, Gretchen Mol as the loving but ever-suffering wife, Willem Dafoe as the ruthless boss, Alison Brie as the rival and Alfred Molina as the token solid supporting male character. First and foremost, „A Family Man" is a genre movie, which means it's produced and put together of clichés in hope of finding a suitable mainstream audience. The approach is pretty solid one, using several drama subgenres in order to appeal to wider circle of cinema-goers, including sick child story, a middle class American success story, finding yourself again story and some „Wall Street" type high-octane competence porn. The execution is actually pretty solid too. The able cast are doing their darndest best to act through all the material, and there's a lot of it. 108 minute movie may feel quite a bit longer, at least for those who have seen way too many movies to take all these clichés and workmanlike storytelling seriously. On the other hand, those who still watch movies as just a nice way of passing time, or aren't tired of bland dramas made of middle- class dreams and aspirations, can definitely find some entertainment here. They don't even have to think how to feel because the movie manipulates you in all the right directions at the right time. I am taking a wild guess that "A Family Man" is most suitable for girlish audience, but it will also surely feel in the right place when it's 2 am and you're desperately trying to find something new to watch with Butler starring in it. He's a doing a fine job too, the whole result relies on his manly charm and grunting. All in all, there's nothing wrong with „A Family Man". It's just there's nothing terribly exciting either, with the creative bar set relatively low and all. I hope I didn't sound too ironic here or something, I quite liked the movie for what it is.
20 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unexpectedly good
Gordon-1124 October 2017
This film tells the story of a successful headhunter, who puts his career first and family second. The unexpected illness of his son makes him re-evaluate his priorities and decisions in his life.

I find this film unexpectedly good. Both Gerard Butler and Gretchen Mol are very good in their roles as heartbroken parents. In addition, Gerard Butler delivers the intensity of a ruthless career man who is charismatic on the outside, but not as beautiful in the inside. The plot is captivating and touching. I really enjoyed watching it.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Underwhelming but emotional at times
alexis-21-811912 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Can't think of a better word to describe this film than the one I chose for the title. Just when I really wanted it to kick up and put another gear on, it did exactly the opposite and even made me laugh with how childish this script is. I mean if you look at this from a safe distance, this is a film about a successful HR man, who is neglecting his family every day because of his jobs demanding hours. Anyways his older son gets ALL, Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and quickly sets on a slippery slope. Dane, Gerard Butler, continues to act the way he was acting, despite now rushing to the hospital instead of his home every night. Meanwhile, at his job he has the reputation of being ruthless and occasionally screws over people in order to remain first in his bosses eyes at the end of each month. So what do we do? The kid must be dying until the final minutes of the film, at which point he miraculously comes back from the coma and the dad loses his job only to become more successful as an independent HR consultant. As I said, childish script undermines the viewers perception and offers nothing more than an hour and a half tv time for a casual family viewing.

Mistakes were plenty too, but what I really hated was the final moments when the kid is dying and Butler makes way for the daughter to hug him too, as if it was a line in the McDonald's and how obvious all is off course at the end, that the kid will wake up. The fact that he enters the room and the producers think that they maintained tension by not allowing him to know if his son is dead or not, is really the fairy dust of every proper joke. Mediocre effort, lucid, see-through script, good to very good acting at times, but all is lost inside this casual effort. The result really is a film that no one will remember ... Skip it if you can
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
What's not to love
mbazhome9 August 2020
I thought this movie was well made although overly melodramatic for sure. Gerard Butler was ok. My favorite part was Alfred Molina. Also enjoyed the Chicago architecture scenes.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Formulaic - not bad but nothing special
maplady22425 October 2020
I never got around to seeing this movie. I'm seeing it now and it's- eh.

Some of the more emotional parts of the script seem a little forced, despite the great acting. I think the written dialogue is a bit old for the age of the children, kids don't speak that way.

Definitely, not a wasted 105 minutes, but not the best you'll ever spend.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Jerry maguire v2.0
yusufpiskin14 January 2020
Magic stirs men's blood. Sunlight streams down on father and son with closed eyes and outstretched arms in downtown Chicago, and their spirits surge. Corporate headhunter Dane Jensen, the father in this scene, needs such magic. Equal parts charming and ruthless, Dane is on the verge of taking over the company that employs him. At the same time, his young son Ryan is diagnosed with a life-threatening illness. Channeling some inner darkness of lies and deceptions has always provided Dane with an edge against competitors inside as well as outside the company, yet that is not what his family needs now. In fact, they've never needed it. No one does. If Dane ever realizes this, it may come too late.

This well written and touching film explores what it means to be a family provider. It takes heart as much as strength, and empathy as much as confidence. The excellent script is written by a former headhunter; it takes one to know one. The film is full of delightful twists and turns, and it goes to unexpected and fascinating places. Part of the magic that stirs Dane's blood, for example, comes from seeing the city and life through the wonder filled eyes of Ryan. The cast, including Gerard Butler as Dane and Willem Dafoe as Dane's boss, is wonderful.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
'All families got problems but you only got one.'
gradyharp28 December 2017
Writer Bill Dubuque and Director Mark Williams have created a tender, sensitive family story that is well developed and addresses many of the issues we all face. A brilliant cast delivers the goods with style and empathy - and Chicago has never been so beautifully captured photographically as cinematographer Shelly Johnson has accomplished. The musical score is by the always-reliable Mark Isham.

As the boss (Willem Dafoe) of a Chicago-based headhunter, Dane Jensen (Gerard Butler), who works at the Blackridge Recruiting agency arranging jobs for engineers, prepares to retire, Jensen vies to achieve his longtime goal of taking over the company going head-to-head with his ambitious rival, Lynn Vogel (Alison Brie). Factors intervene: Dane's close friend Lou (Alfred Molina) is unemployed and desperate for work, Dane's wife Elise (Gretchen Mol) is concerned Dane is not spending time with his family, and Dane's 10-year-old son, Ryan (Max Jenkins), is suddenly diagnosed with Acute Lymphatic Leukemia by the doctor Singh (Anupam Kher) and his professional priorities at work and personal priorities at home begin to clash with one another. Dane spends quality time with Ryan by touring the beautiful architectural wonders of Chicago and Ryan's wise observations set Dane on a new path. Dane finds a job for Lou (at Dane's expense of giving up a headhunter's fee for a friend), and Dane and Elise grow closer. Dane is pulled between achieving his professional dream and supporting his wife and son, who need him now more than ever.

Much of the success of the film is attributable to the fine performance by Gerard Butler, but he is enhanced by the performances of the entire cast. A very 'feel good' movie, perfect to restore faith in humankind just when we need it the most.
22 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Gerard Butler Weeper
Dragonborn6422 August 2020
I had no idea what it was about do I kept waiting for someone to get kidnapped but this is not the typical GB action flick. His kid gets sick and he learns some lessons. Good performances. Half a hanky.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Good performances wasted on a terrible script
mancinibrown18 February 2018
A Family Man tells the story of Dane Jensen (Butler), a headhunter who is proficient at his job, and will sink to all lows to be the best at it. He balances that with a home life, which he maybe isn't home for enough, but is putting in the time to make ends meet for his family.

His whole world is thrown for a loop when his eldest child is found to have a terminal disease. The story follows an extremely predictable path of redemption.

The disappointing aspect of the movie is in what could have been. Butler gives a solid performance as the main character, and Alfred Molina, Willem Defoe, Gretchen Mol, and Alison Brie are all equally up the task. However, the script does such a good job painting Butler's character as ruthless that when it wants to redeem him, all you can do is ask: Really? Similarly Defoe's and Molina's arcs betray they characters.

It really is a shame, because the actors deserved better,
20 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Everyone should watch this movie to learn the important lesson of life before it late .
zackeir11 November 2017
Living so busy in life and very limited for family, this movie reminds us that job and money should,t be the priority in our life. The family are what really matters in our real life and we should give time to the family before its late. acting, writing, romance, music, score, and camera, work is excellent and everyone should watch the movie to learn this important lesson before it late for us.
19 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Family over money
bhanurxz22 September 2020
Awesome....This family drama have lot of moment's to cross check our daily life.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Important msg - Average Performances
121mcv30 August 2017
The story line was very predictable and the acting was just about watchable. People living the dog eat dog world of money and consumerism who plan or have a family should watch this.This move is a must watch for the content not the music or acting. Gerard Butler aka "The Headhunter" performance deserves 5/10 for confirming the greed of the headhunting business.
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
correct
Kirpianuscus19 July 2021
A correct film not only for acting, storytelling, twist and atmosphere but for the science to remind significant things. A direct and honest way to propose the fair suggestion when, so often, the family life is in balance with profesional suces and, at first sigh, all seems very, very simple. A good story and the perfect cast.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good movie, could have been great
alatlantic23 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I actually really liked this movie. It's a rare movie that can hold my attention the entire time - there isn't a lot of filler here. And the story pulls enough heartstrings to make you want to tear up.

So what didn't I like? The Lou storyline. Lou is so darn kind to the lead, who constantly blows him off for being old. The absolute worst part of this movie - that doesn't sit well with me, was the scene of the lead purposefully stealing a job that Lou had just landed.

The movie ends with basically him helping Lou get a job, and Lou later calling to use his recruiting services, saving him. And that's a nice ending, but it felt so gross after watching what we knew. I think they could have left the 'job stealing' scene out altogether and I'd have felt better about the whole movie.

Lastly, the ending was a bit rushed. I had to pause to understand what his ex boss had done - the noncompete - and it's never mentioned or explained.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A real heart puncher....
PerryAtTheMovies19 January 2024
7.1/10 (Recommend)

Perhaps it's what I have going on in my own life. Perhaps it's what I've seen in the lives of others. Whatever it is this movie made me bawl my eyes for a good chunk of it. I was much more emotional than I expected. This isn't the happy, sarcastic movie I thought it was going to be. It's deeply emotional and reminds us that there's limited time on this earth. We never know when things could change and we shouldn't let work dictate our entire lives. We need to make time for those we love and those who love us.

The acting is more powerful than I could've hoped for. Everyone draws you into this dramatic and emotional story. You feel for the family in both the good and hard times. Though the ending isn't what would be expected it still gives you a glimmer of hope in this world. That things can change and there's always hope to start anew.

I know not everyone will feel as tied to this as I have, but it is definitely worth the time. If I had known how I would react to this film I wouldn't have watched it so late, but I'm glad to have checked it out.

That's all for now. Thank you for taking the time to read my review. Until next time.... Enjoy the show!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A beautiful example of carefully crafted character building
michaeljtrubic15 September 2016
Everyone of these characters has depth and is very well textured.

There really wasn't a minor character. There were extras of course but the small selection of characters each had at least two scenes showing 2 different traits that added richness to themselves and to what they had to offer to the primary story line.

Even among the films available to fans of the 2016 festival this one stands out.

A better example of character building I have not seen at this festival. Every film maker has something to learn from watching this film.

So very well done - thank you.
45 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Generic writing and pedestrian performances
moviemagic035 June 2017
I had seen some early reviews from professional critics for A Family Man (The Headhunter's Calling) and they seemed exceptionally harsh, but after seeing the film for myself, I would have to say they were actually being too kind. The writing is extremely weak, tedious, and formulaic. It was sad to see Gerard Butler buried beneath its lackluster and generic weight. While some critics do miss the mark in their reviews, I would have to agree with their early assessment on this one.
25 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Well-observed story with new-quality Gerald Butler
jrarichards7 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Not everyone is going to appreciate Mark Williams's "A Family Man"; and the level of appreciation a viewer does achieve is going to depend more than slightly on a couple of controversial matters. First and foremost is acceptance of terminal illness in a child as a justifiable plot device. The kid here - the part of Ryan Jensen - is Maxwell Jenkins, and he does a very good job. But this is heavy stuff, and might be regarded as a hammer to crack a nut, since this plot is needed to make Ryan's father focus in - at least a bit - on what really matters in life, and what really matters is not (supposed to be) work!

The father - Dane Jensen - is played here by Gerard Butler, who mostly leaves behind his typical kind of role (and his Scottish accent). Which brings us to accept/not accept number 2, and I must say I accepted. Indeed, I warmed to Butler as the character - and to the character itself - far more than I anticipated. The mother of the family (Elise Jensen) is a character (well) played by Gretchen Mol, but the real, realistic joy, interest, sadness and "meat" of the film - for me at least - is the way she basically/mostly fails to understand/sympathise with the nature of the 21st-century trap her husband has fallen into, not especially because he even wants to, but simply because that is how life is ... NOW.

This plotline from real life familiar to many of us goes as follows. A great many people today do jobs whose titles tell you little, and whose descriptions beg the response - "you can make a career out of that?" But this is the 21st century, and few indeed of us are logging or mining or making cars or even teaching or nursing or policing or being Marines or doing medical research. (A glorious contrast in the film is by the way provided as Dane comes into contact with Sikh Dr. Savraj Singh (a very good Anupam Kher), whose "real job" is saving Ryan's life). But many, many people are not exactly producing very much of utility, beauty or future value, but rather helping move money or assets around, and somewhow magicking income up out of nowhere, with who knows what real resources underpinning it. At the outset, the character of Ed Blackridge - that's Ed's boss - sets this scene clearly, and makes it clear that he has gone further than Dane, in that he doesn't even pretend there might be work-life balance, for work and the lifestyle that goes with it is ALL he has, and that allows him to make plenty, and saves him all those expensive items of expenditure (and precious time) associated with family, education, home and all that stuff. You might expect to find somebody playing this part with panache, and you get Willem Dafoe, who does it JUST RIGHT here.

But although Dane (a headhunter as it happens, though it could be a thousand other "corpo" jobs) has taken many a leaf out of Ed's book - far more than his wife would like - we know that he works in this kind of field as the ONLY way for most people to ensure better income in modern America (or other countries in fact), and even then with that income being dependent on working nearly ALL the time, and even then most likely straying beyond the threshold of morality at times. This is not actually Dane's choice, this is what the modern world does, as economist Thomas Piketty will tell you. In a conventional, old-fashioned job you will be mostly condemned to struggle at the boundary between the lower middle-class and the working class, with your income going nowhere for years and years - as it indeed has done in the US and UK for a start (hence support for Trump and Brexit), while even going backwards in countries like Italy. A person might escape that trap by working "flexibly" (meaning 24/7) and/or (sadly/unforgivably) by working deviously - at somebody else's cost. And that way the family (who hardly knows you) is supplied with a standard of living it takes for granted, but WOULD really and truly bemoan if they lost it (however much they protest otherwise when it suits them). But of course that does not stop them (does not Dane's wife Elise and even his kid) from taking the perceived higher moral ground, and criticising endlessly how the guy works - thereby blaming him for some law of the modern world not of his making.

In fact, Dane DOES find a way out - actually helped by Ed (a sweet twist), but in this he does not resemble the majority of the population in America and Europe (at least). There are one or two other plot subtleties, and a beautiful little sub-story about dad-kid quality time focused on the architectural highlights of Chicago - a lovely thing that (like pretty much all of the film) I can very readily understand, appreciate and sympathise with. It's great empathy from the makers.

Interesting, then, that this is seen by some as a woman's film - and doubtless the theory is that Elise gets sympathised with.

But my male take is of sympathy for Dane (if not for his crude descents into immorality and wrong business practices - which I condemn while nevertheless seeing the reasons).

"A Family Man" is not going to appeal universally, but - beyond its possibly-exaggerated flirtation with mawkishness or sadness (depending on your point of view) - it does really, really observe the world around us, which is a wrong world that places value on the wrong things. Who knows if that can ever now be different?
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Poor Casting
dansview16 September 2018
No, no, no! I'm not buying Gerard Butler as an American, or as a Recruiter. He overacted in this one, and his attempt at sounding American was silly. Just let him be an Australian. I'm bored with the over-the-top "alpha" sales guy routine in movies. It's such a cliché. At least have someone do it with nuance. Meanwhile I also didn't buy a marriage between the Butler character and Gretchen Mol's wife.

The makers touched all the bases. They used a Sikh Indian doctor to dispense Eastern wisdom, a young African American male nurse to share empathy, and a wise, precocious boy to root for. But like most Hollywood movies, they didn't want to have any Western religion or wisdom taint the story.

Butler's lead character and Willem Dafoe's supporting character as boss were cartoonish. There was some decent dialog, including some from the wife character about parenting and the need to be there for your family.

Overall, they made an earnest attempt to highlight the "What goes around comes around" philosophy, and the "Pay it forward" concept. I'll give them credit or wanting to encourage a decent value.

But I hope they weren't suggesting that all successful people cut corners and live amoral work lives. I suppose not, because a female competitor at Butler's office seems to have succeeded while being relatively honest.

Well, the acting was poor, the plot telegraphed, the message cliched, but it could have been worse.
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An important movie
rainyday_199514 August 2017
People are not entirely good or entirely bad, this is a model movie that portrays a man doing the right thing in the wrong way. On one hand he is trying to provide for his family and climb up the ranks but on the other hand he does morally wrong things and neglects his family in the process. He is a man we can relate to and in this movie we become invested in him neither hating him nor loving him but sympathizing with him.

Something unexpected happens and our investment becomes even heightened, we cry, laugh and cry all over again. You see happiness, sadness and pure life in this movie - well acted. It is also nice to see marriage portrayed in all it's ups and downs without adding too much drama other than that of unexpected life.

I loved this movie and would recommend it!
27 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A syrupy sweet and not so original film.
peterp-450-29871626 November 2017
"Cancer is not a negotiation, Mr. Jensen."

In "Olympus has fallen" and "London has fallen" Gerard Butler took care of the president of America and fought against a whole battalion of terrorists. In "A family man" Dane Jensen (Gerard Butler) has to fight other demons. On the one hand there's his hectic and energy-hungry job as headhunter. A job he lives for and that keeps him occupied for at least 70 hours a week without exception. And on the other hand there's his charming wife Elise (Gretchen Mol), his son Ryan (Max Jenkins) and daughter Lauren (Julia Butters). A warm family that never lacks anything thanks to Dane's efforts. On a materialistic level that is. Because each and every one of them craves for the presence of a husband and a father figure. Dane may be physically present but in reality he's always busy with his work. This results in displeasure and frustration. Dan always acts like a businessman. When Ryan seems to gain weight, he reacts pragmatically. He just gets up at an inhuman hour to go jogging with his son.

The psychological pressure increases when Dane's boss Ed Blackridge (Willem Dafoe) announces that he's thinking of a well-deserved retirement and passes on his position to the person who can present the best annual figures. You don't have to be a Nostradamus to predict what effect this has on Dan. And then it turns out that Ryan's overweight is not because of playing "Assassin's creed" for hours while enjoying loads of snacks. It's a swollen spleen due to a severe form of leukemia that causes his waistline to increase. Most viewers (including myself) will start rolling their eyes and shake their heads. Not again another sentimental story with that horrible disease as a central theme and the inner conflict certain people will feel. In this case it's Dan who has to find the right balance between his competitive job and the welfare of his son. And he comes to the realization that no compromises can be made or illegal tricks can be used in such a way that the aggravation of the disease can be avoided.

The message is crystal clear after a while. The whole karma and "What goes around comes around" principle is really emphatically emphasized. It's all about that moment when you realize that you shouldn't take everything for granted and you start realizing what's really important in life. I wouldn't be surprised if Dan decided to convert to the monotheistic religion of the Sikhs and move to India to live there as righteous Punjab. The transformation from unscrupulous, senseless workaholic into an insightful family man whose priorities suddenly changed completely, was enormously predictable. But despite that predictability and cheesiness, I couldn't resist to look at the rest of this über-emotional tearjerker.

In terms of content it was perhaps very syrupy sweet and not very original. But in terms of interpretation I can only respect Gerard Butler whose acting-past is richly filled with action-rich roles where an elaborated character wasn't really required. As King Leonidas in "300" and Mike Banning in "London / Olympus has fallen" he only had to be fearless, ruthless and determined. So no complex feelings and character traits. The implausible wasn't due to his acting performance, but due to a reasonably weak script. The most eye-catching and praiseworthy acting is for Max Jenkins who, despite his young age, delivers an admirable performance. Ryan was portrayed realistically by this young boy. The rest of the cast took care of the no less important roles, but they weren't not so explicitly in the spotlight. Gretchen Mol as the disgruntled wife (but on the other hand she was in a privileged position thanks to the well-payed job of her husband). Alison Brie, the ravishing rival of Dan. Willem Dafoe as the single, tyrannical CEO whose life was only focused on making loads of money. And Alfred Molino in a modest role as an unemployed engineer at age, who only serves as a toy in Dan's head hunter's game.

I am not a hypersensitive type or over-sentimental, but when a drama with this kind of subject doesn't not touch me or moves me, then something is wrong. Either it's totally unbelievable or it's so predictable. I'm afraid the movie just follows a well-known path without deviating, so that it has little interesting to offer. Towards the end, I said to my wife: "If that little boy wakes up now, I'll eat my shoe." Never knew that shoe soles were so chewy.

More reviews here : http://movie-freak.be
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A good story about the values that modern society seems to have lost
shamrock_d7 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
As I was watching this movie, it occurred to me that the story line could be one that professional critics would not like. After the credits rolled, I went online to read.

As expected, yes, many users or viewers enjoyed the movie as much as I did. We knew what lines the story would follow - the father obsessed with work and career, the loving home-based mother, the lovable, neglected children who yearn for their often physically and emotionally absent father's affection and attention. As expected too, most professional reviewers had nothing much good to say about it.

Yes, all totally formulaic but the way it was handled in "A Family Man" made it a very enjoyable and emotional ride with excellent performances from each of the actors. Max Jenkins, as the son Ryan, put in a particularly outstanding performance with a subdued, yet subtle portrayal capturing the emotions that made for a perfect buffer to Gerard Butler's loud, overbearing headhunter-father persona.

Each role was played with a small twist that separated them from what we would expect from a family drama. Absent were all the screaming, loud sobs and yelling other than a few which were short and aptly done.

Doctor Singh was a nice touch, adding again a more subdued and yet heart-warming approach to the usual on-screen doctor stereotypes. Despite the much-criticized formulaic script, the trips outside of the hospital gave us a deeper insight into the father-son relationship and how it develops very gradually and even almost imperceptibly.

Of special interest too were hospital scenes that were bereft of the usual gut-wrenching scenes of the pain of treatment. The one solitary emergency scene was short and nicely cut at the right time without the extended flurry and scurrying that ER scenes entail.

I was happy to read a viewer describe how he and the audience in a fully-packed theater gave a standing ovation at the end of a screening, which goes to show that professional critics in general may have become possibly too cynical in their outlook and what stories and movies about life should be like and, in so doing, distancing themselves from us, the people in the street. How many of us do not follow the general formula for life - childhood, education, work, getting married, raising a family, leaving a legacy? If viewers want a story that helps remind us of what we face in life and some of the values that we may have temporarily put into the closet, see this movie. Just don't expect too much. Immerse yourself in the characters.

In the end, too, we are reminded that what goes around does come around.

I thoroughly enjoyed it and it brought me much clarity as well as food for thought.
33 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Decent actors miscast - couldn't buy it
george-coufos111 February 2021
As one who's seen the corporate sales game up close, each of the principals here are badly miscast. I can't say who is the worst between Butler and Dafoe, both miss by miles. This tainted the rest of the movie for me. The family scenes were passable though even there Butler and Gretchen Mol were not ideal for these roles. The children were great. Excellent performance by Maxwell Jenkins as the son.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed