Alimony Madness (1933) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Gee, if soulless unbridled greed was worthy of death, there wouldn't be a live banker left in America!...
AlsExGal7 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
... and I'll let you decide as to whether or not that would be a good thing! Let me also warn you that I spoil the 1937 film, "Confession" just a little bit further down. The title "Alimony Madness" is meant to get your sympathy from the start, because, let's face it, nobody would be sympathetic of the ex-husband in a film named "Child Support Madness".

This poverty row film by PRC is quite well done with players that showed up in some of the major studios' films of the 1930's, in particular Leon Ames and Helen Chandler, and they certainly show their acting chops here.

Architect John Thurman (Leon Ames) is doing well, and although good with blueprints and design, apparently never saw the blueprints for his first wife's designs on his money - past, present, and future. After a year of marriage, Eloise wants a divorce. She also wants one thousand dollars a month and John's 40K stock portfolio, pre stock market crash. John agrees to all of this and even agrees to a New York divorce rather than a Reno one, and the only grounds for divorce in those days in that state was adultery.

It turns out that the paid correspondent is just a girl down on her luck (Helen Chandler as Joan) who needs money to send back home to the folks. She's actually a stenographer. All she has to do is sit in a chair until the wife's paid detectives break in - all pre-arranged of course. Now, almost everyone has an unusual story of how they met their spouse, and John's story is that this paid correspondent is the woman of his dreams - honest, forthright, and not at all bad on the eyes.

John and Joan eventually marry, but in the meantime the Great Depression sets in causing the collapse of John's business. It doesn't help that John's ex-wife, who insisted on the adultery ruse, is going around playing the wronged wife to the privileged set, further contracting John's business. Joan, who thought the two could just live on love, now sees the facts - the first wife is a premeditated blood sucker and will never remarry because she has such a great deal in John. They will always toil away as court appointed slaves to her.

Even this is acceptable to Joan until one night when their child gets ill John is arrested for non-payment of alimony on the way to the drug store to buy vital medicine for the child. Hauled into court and not even allowed to tell his wife he's been detained, he has to give up his last twenty bucks to the court to avoid jail. When he finally returns home with the medicine the child is dead. Joan decides to abandon her pride and go and settle things with Eloise once and for all. Eloise orders her out, but when Joan sees a twenty dollar bill for veterinary services for "Baby", Eloise's dog, the same amount of money that would have saved her child, she grabs a gun and shoots Eloise dead.

Now all of this is told in flashback, in the courtroom, by Joan herself. The jury is in tears, the district attorney is in tears, and Joan is exonerated, and practically congratulated by the judge.

The reason I'm so completely spoiling this film is that this is quite a turn from what would be accepted after the production code came in just a year later. In 1937's "Confession", Kay Francis kills a real blackguard who is about to lead the daughter who doesn't know her down the road to ruin, not to escape heavy financial obligations as Joan did, and yet she has to go jail under the code.

Highly recommended as a well done film from the 1930's on an unusual subject.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Squashed like the bug she is, justifiable homicide or the ruthless actions of a clawing tiger woman?
mark.waltz26 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Second wife kills first wife. What's the story? That's what New York society wants to find out in regards to promising architect Leon Ames (billed as Leon Waycoff), his first wife (Charlotte Merriam) and the black widow on trial, former "Dracula" victim Helen Chandler. Through flashbacks, Ames' past with both wives is examined, with Merriam the most obvious little golddigger, spending Ames' money even before he earns it. He's a rising architect with society matron Blanche Friderici having just hired him for several prominent assignments. But his incoming cash isn't enough for her, leading to divorce court and him agreeing to pretty much every demand she makes. He is paired with Chandler to pretend to be "the other woman" in order to save his soon to be ex's reputation even though it obviously doesn't warrant saving. Soon, he's in court for unpaid alimony, a rather creepy warrant server following him everywhere (with a very sinister tilt of his hat every time they encounter each other), but Chandler has remained devoted, their initial encounter turning into love. Like the second Mrs. De Winter from "Rebecca", she's an innocent in spite of the way they met, and a refreshing change for Ames. They marry, but like a thorn on a beautiful bouquet of roses, Merriam remains a threat. When tragedy strikes the happily married couple thanks to the first wife's interference, Chandler takes shocking, drastic action which leads to her ending up in court, in black, and defending her very existence.

Some drastic over-acting by Chandler weakens this potentially delighftul pre-code women's picture which seems to be more from one of the major studios than one of the poverty row studios. Merriam gives her all to a performance of such selfishness, catering more to her spoiled dog's needs than the rising tragedy in her ex-husband's home, and certainly determined never to ease up. Merriam's portrayal of a "wronged wife" leads Fredirici to drop her account with Ames because of the scandal involved which makes it impossible for Ames to pick up any additional clients. There's a chill in the air in the confrontation scene with Chandler, Merriam and her pooch, accelerated by the medical bill for Merriam's pup (named "Baby") as Chandler has just undergone one of the worst tragedies a woman can imagine. This is a fun pre-code soap opera, a bit more elegantly made than a lot of poverty row studio fare, even if some of Chandler's acting (and that pesky warrant server) are more than just slightly annoying.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
An Excellent First Half
boblipton26 April 2023
Charlotte Merriam tells her husband, rising architect Leon Ames, she wants a divorce. He offers $40,000 in securities. Her lawyer says she must have alimony also. Ames agrees to $1,000 a month. She won't go to Mexico or Reno, so he agrees to a co-respondent. It turns out to be Helen Chandler. She has been fired as a stenographer and her folks out west need the $100 she'll get. Ames sees what an innocent she is, and tries to shield her, but she is identified.

Ames' practice promptly tanks from the public scandal. He doesn't have the money to pay the alimony and is thrown into jail, whence Miss Chandler rescues him, goes to work for him, and marries him. But the bad times continue while Miss Merriam lives high on the hog.

The first half of this movie is excellent, with Miss Chandler nailing the role, and Ames is excellent, as always. It's the second half and its conversion into a weepy indictment of the depredations of useless women bleeding their ex-husbands dry, that looks ridiculous in its sob story. Director B. Reeves Eason -- credited as "Breezy Eason" -- gets the movie through the second marriage, then largely gives up and finishes it off mechanically. With Blanche Friderici, Alberta Vaughn, and John Ince.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Helen Chandler as the "Tiger Lady"
drednm25 February 2013
Nifty little low budget film about divorce and more specifically alimony. Leon Ames plays a sap married to a conniving woman (Charlotte Merriam) who wants a divorce after admitting to him that she only married him for his money (he's an architect) and the alimony she' can get out of him.

He's so distraught he agrees to all her greedy requests including $40,000 in bonds and $1,000 in monthly alimony. To get the divorce, the sap also agrees to "get caught" with a woman in his office and naming her correspondent. Enter Helen Chandler as Joan. She's out of work and takes the seedy assignment for a quick $100.

Later, she comes to work for Ames but his business has collapsed because of the bad publicity from the divorce. The ex-wife is gadding about Europe when Ames is brought to court for non-payment of his alimony checks. He's tossed into an "alimony jail" with others who can't pay.

Chandler gets him out and marries him and they have a kid. But it's a constant struggle because the shrew ex-wife never lets up about her late alimony checks, and she has no plans to remarry and lose her meal ticket.

Things get worse and worse and then the kid gets sick. While running out to get a prescription, Ames is hauled back into court for nonpayment. By the time he gets back to his house with the medicine, Chandler has made a plan.

She confronts the ex-wife and the worst happens. But it's the only way to get out from under alimony payments in a legal system that allows an ex-wife to bleed her ex-husband for years, depriving him of any real life.

Chandler is terrific as the frantic young wife. Ames and Merriam are also solid. Alberta Vaughn is the friend, Blanche Friderici is the haughty client. Edward Earle is the sleazy lawyer, and Arthur Loft the nice one.

An interesting topic for a 1933 film, and it pulls out all the stops in the pre-Code drama.
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Despite negative contemporary reviews, this is actually a fine film from Poverty Row.
JohnHowardReid7 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The films "Breezy" Eason directed are usually much less interesting than those on which he handled the second unit. Evidently he was often employed as a "full" director solely on his undoubted ability to shoot quickly and economically. Alimony Madness, however, is actually rather impressive. Maybe the subject was dear to Eason's heart. But whatever the reason, the movie is handled with both force and style. Neville's screenplay is extremely critical of the way unscrupulous women – with the aid of equally unscrupulous lawyers allied with corrupt or incompetent judges – make a mockery of laws that were originally intended to safeguard them. The police also are roundly criticized for their roles in these faked proceedings. Unlike the movie's stupid judge, the police are fully aware of these manufactured divorce settlements and although we don't actually see them taking bribes, there can be no doubt that their enthusiastic participation was based on money-in-the-hand rather than on any desire to uphold the law – however corrupted or inappropriate it might be.

As the victim, stoical Leon Ames gains attention and sympathy, but it's Helen Chandler who walks off with the film's acting honors, closely followed by the vicious Charlotte Merriam and blind-as-only-an-ardent-feminist-can-be Blanche Frederici. Available on a high quality Alpha DVD.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed