A lot of the Jeffrey Epstein docs are disappointing because there really is no information. This too is similar. The people they interview are mostly people who don't have any actual information and are largely speculating based on what they know. Here we talk to people like Tina Brown and Dickie Arbiter. They don't know that much.
We go through the history of Andrew and, if you don't know this stuff, it might be interesting but most of what they cover we already know. There is no one they talk to who knows Andrew and can offer meaningful reasons why this stuff happened. Or even offer any defense. For instance, the. Virginia Giuffre lawsuit was settled when Andrew's team demanded the original photo of her and Andrew... humn... does seem that is evidence the photo was doctored but no one is touching that fact.
Just a very basic shallow documentary, piling on to the news that is already out there.
We go through the history of Andrew and, if you don't know this stuff, it might be interesting but most of what they cover we already know. There is no one they talk to who knows Andrew and can offer meaningful reasons why this stuff happened. Or even offer any defense. For instance, the. Virginia Giuffre lawsuit was settled when Andrew's team demanded the original photo of her and Andrew... humn... does seem that is evidence the photo was doctored but no one is touching that fact.
Just a very basic shallow documentary, piling on to the news that is already out there.