It was a fun movie throughout, very enjoyable. Everyone ate their
popcorn and drank their drinks and cheered for the good guys and
booed the bad guys. I would've enjoyed it except for a few things: 1. The bad guys were TOO BAD. From Hackman as the villain
(how appropo), who will stoop to anything and has no values at all,
to the Dr. EEEEVIL Gun Company Executives who's only concern
about values is when they are concerned that they are not getting
value for their money. They are too stupid to know any argument for
their case except, "Ah Staynd on the Second Amendment". 2. The good guys are TOO GOOD. I can't tell much about this
without giving away the plot, but if Hoffman had been wearing a
White Hat (tm) it wouldn't have been any more obvious. Even if he
has no social skills, everyone on his side is quietly virtuous. 3. The arguments are shallow, and solely emotional. This is a
deep topic with solid arguments on both sides of the issue. The
Good Guys (tm), the gun controllers, used nothing but emotional
appeals and straw man arguments. Of course part of that related
to the plot, but no good lawyer would make the mistake that he
does here. The Bad Guys (tm), the Gun Nuts (tm) cannot even
pretend to defend themselves, which is why they bring in the big
guns (Hackman). But then again, this is a movie about THE JURY,
so if they hadn't spent every spare moment that wasn't movie the
plot in preaching, they would've actually had to fill out the story
about the jury. Which segues into... 4. The jury is barely one-dimensional. I've served on a jury. I know
people who've served on a jury. While they're usually not the most
wonderful best friends you could ever have, they're not the
cardboard cutouts that these ones are. Every character is as
fleshed out as they're going to get the first moment you see them.
There is one brief moment, essential to the plot, where they fill
them in a little, but no more than is necessary for the plot. 5. Gun makers as the villains. Puleeze. Just because they're the
official Hollywood "Villain of the Month", courtesy of the
embarrassing psuedo-documentary/puff piece by Michael Moore.
Just left a sour taste in my mouth. It's like switching the villains to
Neo-Nazis from South Africa. Easy Hollywood target, no thinking
required, no truth required. I'm sorry, but if the film makers had spent less time preaching, and
more time either telling the story or presenting both sides, like a
REAL courtroom drama, I could recommend it. I actually enjoyed
about 30 minutes of the movie. Sad. Oh, and if they hadn't spent all the previews hiding what the case
was about, I wouldn't have been QUITE so annoyed.
popcorn and drank their drinks and cheered for the good guys and
booed the bad guys. I would've enjoyed it except for a few things: 1. The bad guys were TOO BAD. From Hackman as the villain
(how appropo), who will stoop to anything and has no values at all,
to the Dr. EEEEVIL Gun Company Executives who's only concern
about values is when they are concerned that they are not getting
value for their money. They are too stupid to know any argument for
their case except, "Ah Staynd on the Second Amendment". 2. The good guys are TOO GOOD. I can't tell much about this
without giving away the plot, but if Hoffman had been wearing a
White Hat (tm) it wouldn't have been any more obvious. Even if he
has no social skills, everyone on his side is quietly virtuous. 3. The arguments are shallow, and solely emotional. This is a
deep topic with solid arguments on both sides of the issue. The
Good Guys (tm), the gun controllers, used nothing but emotional
appeals and straw man arguments. Of course part of that related
to the plot, but no good lawyer would make the mistake that he
does here. The Bad Guys (tm), the Gun Nuts (tm) cannot even
pretend to defend themselves, which is why they bring in the big
guns (Hackman). But then again, this is a movie about THE JURY,
so if they hadn't spent every spare moment that wasn't movie the
plot in preaching, they would've actually had to fill out the story
about the jury. Which segues into... 4. The jury is barely one-dimensional. I've served on a jury. I know
people who've served on a jury. While they're usually not the most
wonderful best friends you could ever have, they're not the
cardboard cutouts that these ones are. Every character is as
fleshed out as they're going to get the first moment you see them.
There is one brief moment, essential to the plot, where they fill
them in a little, but no more than is necessary for the plot. 5. Gun makers as the villains. Puleeze. Just because they're the
official Hollywood "Villain of the Month", courtesy of the
embarrassing psuedo-documentary/puff piece by Michael Moore.
Just left a sour taste in my mouth. It's like switching the villains to
Neo-Nazis from South Africa. Easy Hollywood target, no thinking
required, no truth required. I'm sorry, but if the film makers had spent less time preaching, and
more time either telling the story or presenting both sides, like a
REAL courtroom drama, I could recommend it. I actually enjoyed
about 30 minutes of the movie. Sad. Oh, and if they hadn't spent all the previews hiding what the case
was about, I wouldn't have been QUITE so annoyed.
Tell Your Friends