7.1/10
79,704
366 user 163 critic

Runaway Jury (2003)

PG-13 | | Drama, Thriller | 17 October 2003 (USA)
A juror on the inside and a woman on the outside manipulate a court trial involving a major gun manufacturer.

Director:

Writers:

(novel), (screenplay) | 3 more credits »
Reviews
Popularity
4,698 ( 1,519)

Watch Now

From $2.99 (SD) on Amazon Video

ON DISC
3 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
...
...
Durwood Cable
...
Judge Harkin
...
...
Doyle
...
Henry Jankle
...
Frank Herrera
...
Janovich
...
Lamb
...
Vanessa Lembeck
...
Herman Grimes
...
Celeste Wood
Edit

Storyline

Wendell Rohr is a torts lawyer taking on the gun lobby. Rankin Fitch is the jury consultant for the Defendants and between them the battle is for the hearts and minds of the jury. But there is someone on the inside. Nicholas Easter is a juror with a girlfriend, Marlee, on the outside. they have a past ..... and their own agenda. Written by johnno.r@xtra.co.nz

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

Trials are too important to be decided by juries.

Genres:

Drama | Thriller

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG-13 for violence, language and thematic elements | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

| |

Release Date:

17 October 2003 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Le maître du jeu  »

Box Office

Budget:

$60,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

$11,836,705 (USA) (17 October 2003)

Gross:

$49,440,996 (USA) (20 February 2004)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

| |

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

In the novel, the lawsuit is filed against a tobacco company. This screenplay was in development for several years and, after the release of The Insider (1999), all subsequent scripts involved a lawsuit against a gun manufacturer. Although, the movie contains various references to tobacco. Eg. Nick Easter's advice to the maintenance man at the beginning. See more »

Goofs

When Marlee supposedly jots down her e-mail address for Fitch on the street car, she uses about 2 or 3 pen strokes, which is barely enough for her to write "@" much less an actual e-mail address. See more »

Quotes

Rankin Fitch: I must say, I'm impressed, Mr. Kerr...
Nicholas Easter: Easter.
Rankin Fitch: "Easter." Correct... I didn't see you coming. Ovbiously I, uh, underestimated you. And as a rule, I don't do that. Make damn sure... you don't underestimate me.
See more »

Connections

Referenced in Fear of Clowns (2004) See more »

Soundtracks

Big Rock Candy Mountain
Written by Harry McClintock (as Harry 'Haywire Mac' McClintock)
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Awesome Performances by Hackman, Cusack, Hoffman & Weisz.
4 December 2004 | by (Calimesa, California) – See all my reviews

Not since Primal Fear have I seen a court room thriller that was really good. Given the actors, I suppose you can't really go wrong. Usually I can find some actor or actress that wasn't very good, bothered me in some way or was flat out horrible. This movie featured superb acting by all those involved. Even Jeremy Piven (who I can't help but picture as the Dean in Old School or his characters from PCU or Very Bad Things) delivered a respectable performance, and very different from the other movies mentioned.

Runaway Jury doesn't throw in a lot of needless plot twists and unexpected happenings just for the sake of throwing off or fooling the viewer. In fact, it pretty much goes in the direction you think it will, with only a couple of exceptions which are needed.

I'm usually the type that likes my movies to get it all done in around 90 minutes or so. Seems to me that most movies that go over 2 hours have a lot of needless "filler" material for no real reason, which, more often than not, results in slow, dragging scenes in the movie or just a boring movie altogether. This particular movie clocked in at just over 2 hours and used every minute wisely. Nothing boring and nothing seemed to drag on forever. I found the beginning with the jury selection particularly interesting. I thought the whole concept of knowing how to get exactly who you want on your jury, even before they actually show up to jury duty, was a little mind blowing. After seeing those scenes, I knew it was going to be a great movie. I highly recommend this movie, especially if you enjoyed movies like Primal Fear, although this is a completely different movie with different kinds of surprises.

Overall, Gene Hackman stole the show in this one and proves why he's been working in movies and television for over 40 years now. I give this 9 out of 10.


81 of 104 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?