3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Unrealistic characters.
28 March 2022
Unrealistic characters portrayed. This movie is woke, it has inserted characters who are extremely unlikely to have been involved in the period depicted, but apparently inserted them to be inclusive without regard for historical accuracy. Watch the trailer and decide for yourself.
22 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cisco Pike (1971)
4/10
Kristofferson's star has burst...have I fallen asleep yet
8 March 2016
Warning: Spoilers
A boring leading man, a better supporting cast. I found myself enjoying the supporting characters far more than the lead character. Lacking any significant vocal inflection, Kristofferson may have just as well mumbled all his lines. During the entire film I couldn't help but be astonished how characterless Kristofferson was, he was like a man-child still carrying babyfat; I now understand why he chose to grow a beard, heck, he didn't even have any chest hair. Between the constant sweeping back of his hair, and his awkward posturing and walk, this is a man uncomfortable in his own skin. Unlike Gene Hackman who seems to have been born with character, Kristofferson is nearly expressionless and other than his eye color, lacks any interesting facial features. His just isn't a face that's able to convey anything beyond his now cliché wry smile.

As for the premise of the movie, it's quite ridiculous. Unless I missed it from zoning out, it's never clearly explained why his must sell the product within the timeframe...was it going to turn into a pumpkin at the stroke of midnight?! I suppose it's because the cop would be fired in a couple of days, so he wouldn't be able to drop the criminal charges against the dealer anymore; but surely the cop knew for quite a while that his health issue would result in his discharge. It's also unrealistic for the cop to explain his retirement problem to a drug dealer to what...absolve his guilt, gain empathy, lay the blame elsewhere...a cop isn't going to explain his actions to a criminal. Then there's the ending where a corrupt, streetwise cop of 19 years of service panicked over what he thought was a frame-up...sure. Then to first shoot at an approaching ambulance (because SWAT obviously hides in them) rather than the guy beside you whom you think framed you, so now you have to chase him down the beach. This is just a lame movie that exploits counterculture for what is essentially a failed attempt at an action drama.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Just call me Chuckles.
7 March 2015
Enjoyed this show for what it is: a simple and fun, light-hearted comedy. If you're looking for more than that, then either get over yourself or change the channel to one of the "smart-comedies". If you're looking to watch something without pretense that you can unwind and laugh about without any thought, then watch this show.

Those complaining of stereotypes and tropes should realize every TV comedy subsists on those. Perhaps some are just more visible to you than others. Stereotypes persist not only because of lack of imagination, but also because most comedy is dependent on the audience being familiar with the subject. The two highest rated comedies at present, The Big Bang Theory and Modern Family, are both heavily reliant on stereotypes...we like what we know.

I'm glad to see Will Forte in this show. He's one of those actors who when you see them, you want them to be funny...probably because he puts it all on the line and commits to the role despite its absurdity. His timing is spot-on, and even though his character is transparent, there's a joy in seeing the situation play out.

In an era of comedies that try too hard (read: fail) to be clever, witty, and ADD-like rapid fire, as in line with the self-perceived image of Millenials, this show is a quite welcome relief.
31 out of 122 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed