Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Predator (2018)
4/10
How'd I Finish This Film?
11 September 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The bounty hunter predator's 'dog' with dreads turns on him for absolutely no reason by bringing the 'good guys' a space grenade to kill him? A spacecraft type that required a young prodigy to crack the lock sequence later only took three or four keystrokes to open from his father? An Iron-Man predator killing suit? I half expected when the "predator killer" container came open for Shane Black to hop out. This was one hell of a smudge on this otherwise relatively impressive director/writer's career.

Thank the stars for Keegan-Michael Key, at least.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Contagion (2011)
7/10
A Great 'What To Do If' Movie
24 June 2019
What a stellar cast. Contagion could have been called, Affliction's 11, it had so many big-name actors. A believable story from start--which takes off like a bullet thanks, in part, to no opening credits--to finish. At one point in the movie I had to remind myself I was watching a fictional scenario and not a documentary. Really. Literally. I was that drawn into the story.

For all the elements the movie nailed, there were a couple of gripes. But only one significant one. First, I felt as though the wife cheating on her husband was unnecessary for the story. But, the big one was the abrupt, rushed ending. it felt as though the production was running over-budget and threw together a quick bat/pig/chef montage. And what was with the bulldozer bearing the company logo the dead wife had worked for? Maybe another part of the story that was cut out?

In any case, Contagion has become one of my favorite epidemic movies. Definitely recommended for anyone who ever wonders what would happen if a deadly global disease outbreak happened.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dredd (2012)
5/10
Dreddful
23 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Yikes! After finally remembering this movie existed from my initial interest upon its release, I got the chance to watch Dredd. As a mindless action flick, it's good enough to sit through. It's moderately enjoyable from a cinematic point of view. Great color grade, set-pieces, art design, for the most part. But, I'm happy I didn't waste the price of a movie ticket. Amazingly, this film even comes up on a couple top scifi movies of ALL TIME. Sometimes my fellow geek culture brethren severely disappoint me.

Where to start? First off, how did the Judges' helmets get past the director's approval? The funky red X design not only looks goofy, but isn't practical for a job where seeing your environment clearly and in its entirety is paramount to staying alive. The bottom of the X comes right in front of the mid to upper field of vision. When Dredd asks Anderson why she forgot her helmet she should have replied, Because I like to see where I'm going. Oh, and speaking on helmets. Anderson said she doesn't wear it because it prevents her from reading minds. So why was she able to read through Dredd's helmet? Actually, why was it necessary to have a mutant in the story at all? Seemed entirely out of place.

Then there's the fact that they cast Karl Urban, a well known actor, as Dredd but your average movie goer wouldn't have known, SINCE HE NEVER TOOK OFF HIS HELMET. This isn't the first movie to commit this ridiculous mistake. Man in the Iron Mask comes to mind. That stated, He did do a fairly excellent portrayal of Judge Dredd. Though, how insulting was it that we, the audience, were expected not to realize how ridiculous it was that when his gun was almost out of ammo, that Dredd didn't pick up a couple discarded weapons from the dead baddies? I mean come on, it was bad enough that writing oversight resulting in him being shot with an ARMOR PIERCING round in the guts and literally walking away two minutes later. That exit wound should have been the size of a softball. Yet, when Anderson gets shot with a regular bullet in the stomach she's down for ten minutes.

What else? Oh, the camera eyed albino computer hacker. Why did it look like he was going to start crying in ABSOLUTELY EVER SCENE HE WAS IN? It's like the director told him his inspiration was that his secret lover, Baxter the Hamster, had been ratnapped by robot cats and would only be returned if Electro Eyes went outside to catch some rays and get a tan.

The movie was also predictable. Call 911. Next scene four Judges walk up to the building. Hmmm, I wonder if they are bad guys? Let's ask the Peachtree Command guy. Will you testify to that? Yes. Bhoooosh!!! And, thud.

Lastly, though not the last flaw of the film, there's the whole slo mo drug cinematic effect. The movie should have been ten minutes shorter. Yeah, hey, we get it. The narcotic makes the user see sparkly faded rainbow colors at a thousand fps. Literally, there should have only been four or five uses of this effect. The first time the drug is demonstrated. The scene with the two teenagers buying a hit. When the three guys were skinned and tossed. And, of course when Mama met that same doom. Actually, four, yeah, it could have been done in four. But, definitely no more than five.

I typically refrain from expressing my dissatisfaction of a movie, but this one receives entirely too much praise for being such a stinker. It almost qualifies to be in the category of movies that are so bad, they're good.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Any aficionado of storytelling and the art, love and purpose of communication will not want to miss this
20 May 2018
Nearly every aspect of this work-of-art is perfectly complemented. Lost language and love, dying and the persistence of opportunity slipping away-so poetic and enchanting. Many movies strain for the type of majesty "Sueño en otro idioma" accomplishes seemingly effortlessly, but only one or two a year ever surface into mainstream society.

Bravo to Ernesto Contreras, cast and crew.
24 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fantasy Forged to Film Fantastically
13 December 2013
Before I get started, know this: HFR did not, in my opinion, take away from the experience. Instead, I felt like I was watching the next step in the evolution of cinema, and it was not unlike the first time I experienced 3D.

Peter Jackson, you are an asset to the college of film dear sir. It has been awhile, and only a handful of times, since I've actually set on the edge of my seat at the movie theater. Desolation of Smaug caused my eyeballs to attempt transfusing with the screen for the entire last quarter of the film.

Desolation of Smaug feeds off of the wide-open stage that most of us trudged our way through to build by first viewing An Unexpected Journey. Thanks to that, this second film was a non-stop barrel ride down the rapids of anticipation, and my friends, I got drenched.

I'm not going to go into details on what this film does in the animation department that sets the bar for other films. Also, there will be no details on how well the story does, or does not, adhere to the text from J.R.R. Tolkien. Since I've not read the book, and the animation can really only be truly appreciated by viewing said film yourself (seeing how HFR is 48fps, and a picture is worth a thousand words, and it's nearly three hours long, that's more words than I care to type), I'll leave those details for you to discover.

The one thing I would like to add, since I can't seem to find the subject matter online, is that that Smaug seems to be an analogy for religion if I followed the story correctly. Basically, the dwarfs are set to be the equivalent of humankind. The dwarfs (humankind) became greedy and things started falling apart. Along comes a dragon (religion) to take control of the wealth, since humankind couldn't resist the disease of greed. And, well, that's as far as I've taken the idea, but I think there's merit to the theory.

To wrap up my transient flash of this film fan's take on The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug, I'll simply say this. Go see this film. At the theater I went to, there were children as young as seven or so in attendance, and given the fact it was nearly a three-hour movie and I didn't once hear the impatience of young jabbering, that tells you something.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed