Reviews

8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Attic (2007 Video)
1/10
Boring
21 February 2019
Just awful. It's not "so bad it's good", it's bout even funny bad. Is just awful, since editing choices makes me question the sanity of the involved people
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Just plain dumb
15 February 2019
While the first one is not a enjoyable or smart, in any way whatsoever, this second "movie" in the franchise is just plain dumb. It fails in every level. Not a single aspect of this is salvageable. They even have a scene where the actors walk in place pretending to stroll down the street on a green screen. This is laughable, and not in a "so bad its good" way Furthermore, how is this not called just porn?
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
WTH?!
23 November 2018
I was expecting a crappy fun movie, with bad acting, writing and directing. That's exactly what this movie brings. But, oh my god, there's something magical, that I wouldn't believe if someone told me about it. The editing. I can't tell if the editor ever saw a movie, for real. Normal, dialogues scenes, have a cut per second, sometimes even more. Cutting to reaction shots from characters that are not even important to whats being said. Music cues that makes no sense to the scene. Laughable choices that I can't make justice in here. I urge you, seek it and watch it, it's as bad as it could be.

All that's not even talking about a white actor playing an native american in the most offensive portrayal I've ever seen, and he seems clueless, no harm meant, i guess. That makes it so funny. I LOVE THIS MOVIE
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
50/50
13 November 2017
At times this is one of the worst movies i've ever seen. But, at some times it's amazing. I truly expected to see two director credits, because there are scenes that are done so incredible, while the other half is so crappy. Half the movie the acting is bad, other half is moving and heart-warming. The kid actor is great, only when she is not, then she is cringy. I really don't understend how this movie was directed by only one person.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not Yoko, not the Beatles either
7 April 2013
First, two warnings:

1)This musical takes the material of 'The Beatles', maybe the most loved band of all times, so, clearly that some people will hate on it even before seen it. But this movie isn't no Yoko Ono, so chill

2)This review is divided in two parts, 'For Everybody' and 'For Beatles fans'

['For Everybody']

This movie starts with a silly 'High School Music' feeling, quite dumb. But, when the principal plot is presented, we are on a ride for some good shots, that move the audience to the 60s, giving the whole experience on the youth of the time. And some times we are led to incredible moments, like the Detroit scene, or the strawberries scene, just blowing minds. With a combination of music, acting and photography that really bring a whole new feel to your soul. A very fun ride for all

This movie have some problems, if you don't have the Beatle's discography you may enjoy a little more the less famous songs, since its never the same thing, and get pretty disappointing when your favorite song is played in a "wrong way". Another problem is the feel that the filmmakers tried to shove the most music as they could in the movie, and sometimes you feel like a certain song isn't really needed in the moment.

['For Beatles fans']

Don't go to watch this thinking on your idols, the actors do their best, but they aren't Paul, John, George and Ringo. In a homage aspect the movie brings the feel of the music, and on the time. So go for a fun ride, and expect a fan movie made for the Beatles.

Ps.: Sorry for the misuse of any word, or any mistake on grammar, English is my third language
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aliens (1986)
9/10
Not 'alien'. But great on its own
6 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
A movie that didn't spoiled the legacy of 'Alien' as so many sequels did with their originals. Cameron's movie is good on its own, without having to hold on the first movie. With more actions scene the flick goes to a different direction, on a 'Bad-A' Ripley and thousands of aliens. We see the evil intents of 'The company' even more clearly on this. All this together sequel worth watching for the quality, not 'just to see' as in the third movie.

Even the new characters (who are mostly bad news to sequels) have their parts well explained, like Bishop, having to gain Ripley's trust, or Burke, who it's only interested in money.

It's a must watch for sure :)
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Alien 3 (1992)
3/10
Not 'alien' or 'aliens'
6 April 2013
This is the third 'alien' movie. The first one is a classic sci-fi horror movie. The second is a action movie with sci-fi. This is a sci-fi movie, and that's it. The story isn't taking us anywhere, and seems a way to close the trilogy, without any highlights. It's just a movie about Ripley, some inmates and a alien-dog. The twist is so obvious that some may get in the first flashes. The funny thing is that special effects on first movie (1979) still look great today, in this movie (1992) the use of a computerized alien-dog just seems B movie material nowadays

Watch to see a Alien movie, don't watch thinking about the quality of the first two.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not big deal
21 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I start this with a "I'm sorry for my bad English", I'm Brazillian

The movie receive so much buzz, and all I heard was how terrifying was. For a guy that find every thing scary that movie should be hell. Well, in the time I didn't have enough age to get in on this movie, so I wait till DVD. The movie don't give me nothing, just a guy and a girl on a house saying that they heard something or see something. they start to leave thing so the "thing" can make marks, the monster, or demon or something like it do thing that a open window in a windy night could do. Anyway, almost in the and the strange events start to increase, more suspicious noises and marks, even a board on fire. After the girl is pulled off of the bed and carried out of the room, and a teeth mark shows up. After that the girl start to act weird, and finally in the very end of the movie the demon really do something taking her body, killing the guy and trowing his dead body though the entire room. So, the good part begun, we gonna see some demon after all. Nope. the girl/demon open her mouth next to the camera and the movie ends. Just in the second I believe that had something in the house. Too bad
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed