Reviews

7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Phagun (1973)
9/10
A Very Watchable Film.
11 March 2009
This film is a little off the main run of Hindi movies. The storyline is a bit different, yet will be instantly recognisable to millions of Indians living in joint families much influenced by their elders! And also about pride, and resentment and ultimately regret and forgiveness.

Music is good and well-integrated into the film; in fact a turning point of the plot is during one of the songs. Dialogue is characteristically Bedi, who spurned the more melodramatic tendencies of a lot of films and Phagun has characters talking in his direct and down-to-earth, realistic conversational style.

It is certainly good family entertainment and recommended to all who like our Hindi films to be a little less absurd. Director Rajinder Singh Bedi contributed to some quality writing in Indian cinema through films like Madhumati or Abhimaan. If you like this, also watch his other directorial venture, Dastak.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Water (I) (2005)
5/10
Uneccessary Historical Inaacuracies
19 May 2008
I switched off the moment "Gandhi" was portrayed as an "unknown" just returned from South Africa...in 1938????????? Couldn't Ms Mehta have picked up a child's history of India and read something? By 1938 Gandhi had gone from Jallianwalla Bagh (1917)-leader of Congress, the biggest Indian party (1921), also start of Civil Disobedience movement, and the Satyagrah and Swadeshi movments, Salt March (1929)...point is, that by 1938, Gandhi was more than a household name even in remotest India.

Couldn't see the point of this total historical inaccuracy except to make Indians sound even more backward and dependent. Also by this time there were a lot of Hindu Reform movements were already very active in the late 1800s.

Although child marriage with older men was there, a vast majority of child marriages were betrothals between children of a similar age (my own 2 sets of grandparents who had a couple of years difference), which did not actually result in marriage as living together. This did not happen until they were of a more "suitable" age, when the bridegroom would formally come to fetch his bride, which is called, e.g. "muklava" in Punjabi.

So despite the beautiful photograph, the setting was clearly identifiable as somewhere in South India right a the beginning (I learnt it was Sri Lanka at the end), but was meant to be Varanasi or thereabouts, I found it very dull, flat film after the strong beginning. John Abraham's character was a washout, one doesn't really understand what is he waiting around doing nothing and why does he let her go and why doesn't he go for her immediately knowing the situation, etc. etc.

A let-down.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pakeezah (1972)
9/10
a great movie
15 June 2007
This film opened to poor showings in the first few weeks. Then Meena Kumari died and it just brought the crowds rolling in. Songs on All India Radio, especially Inhi LogoN ne were played so often that I was sick of them at the time, despite recognising their beauty!

Yes, it did take all those years to make. This was because the marriage was a very unhappy one and Kamal Amrohi also had difficulty finding the money to make the film; looking at the sumptous sets and costumes, not surprising!! Not only does Meena Kumari age and fall ill but listen carefully to Lata's voice. Inhi logoN ne has her 50's younger voice while songs that were re-recorded like Chalo dildar chalo show clear development. I only wish someone would find the Ghulam Mohammad songs that weren't included in the film, because of changing fashions that called for fewer though slightly songs and publish them. Lata in a recent interview (2007) rated Ghulam Mohammad as one of the best composers she had ever worked with, apart from Madan Mohan (a great personal friend). Notice also that you hardly see the actors at all in the Chalo dildar songs, very unusual. There is only a brief shot of Raj Kumar from the middle distance and you only see the back of the supposed Meena Kumari. Kamal Amrohi made a virtue out of necessity and focused on the stars and moon. Any other film, this song would have had close-ups of both of them.

As for this being the finest film ever, I would beg to differ. It means you have missed a lot of Indian cinema, in no particular order, films like Barsaat (old), Devdas (older versions), Bandini, Do Bigha Zameen, Garam Hava, Dastak, Guddi, Aan, Pyasa, Kagaz ke Phool, Sahib Bibi aur Ghulam, Kabuliwallah, Abhimaan, Guide, Sujatha, Bombay ka Babu, Daag, Parineeta (old), Umrao Jaan, etc. etc. And if you valued music more than story the list would simply grow with beautiful scores from Barsat Ki Raat to Naya Daur, Teesri Manzil, Mahal, Aag, Jugnu, Anand, Mera Naam Joker: the list is really endless!

So enjoy Pakeezah but don't miss out on any of the above...
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great film-making
30 December 2006
This one is a real entertainer. This movie is genuinely funny and genuinely a mystery. Hrishkesh Mukherjee was a genuinely good director and story-teller; something which a lot of filmmakers seem to forget nowadays. You should also watch some of his other films: they are very different from each other and most are in the lower-budget range but with excellent results. Music and songs are also memorable.

Just adding the comment to Yellow_Spider that his comments for this film were being lifted "word-for word" by the presenter of "Bollywood Ke Sunehre Pal" of smashits.com. Watch the November 17th 2006 episode's introduction to Buddha Mil Gaya and the song "raat kali ikk khwab me ayee" Maybe you should be acting as their writer.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
if there was a -10 category...
13 April 2006
just absolute piece of utter drivel..although I admit I only lasted about half an hour somewhere in the middle You can't even call this rubbish... for instance, I caught the scene where they are supposedly digging in the wrong place, find the right place (72 steps, but no ones counting) and about 20 metres away the heroine brushes away a few CMOS of sand BY HAND and uncovers the tomb....a few rubbishy sentences later we see someone put a dynamite YES DYNAMITE stick in the very same sand, it blows up, and you have this beautiful SQUARE HOLE with nice clean staircase going down to the tomb. No wonder they call it King Tut. Tut tut, exactly.
11 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent all round work by Gurdas Mann to bring quality cinema
26 April 2002
Solid movie based upon a real life story at the time of Partition, about Boota Singh (Gurdas Mann) married to a Muslim girl who is forcibly deported to Pakistan in the mess that was the partition, leaving behind her daughter. He eventually goes in search of her, but she repudates him under pressure. Boota Singh dies, and in fact his grave is still in Lahore. Excellent work by all actors, Gurdas Mann is noted for quality products, and this is one of them. A joy for Punjabi language lovers, with nice locations, and very good, of course! music. A must-see.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bandini (1963)
10/10
Not-to-be-missed, one of the greats of Indian cinema in every aspect.
8 February 2002
A really fantastic film, one of the most emotional I have seen without falling into sentimentalism or being weepy. So many memorable scenes, but the song by Asha filmed on Nutan's prison mate must be one of the most touching, proves songs Are a part of a movie that add to it, when well done. Nutan is just excellent, Ashok Kumar is his usual believable self, and Dharmender does what he is supposed to, young, handsome upright man. Nothing superfluous about this movie, a must see.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed