Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
RahXephon (2002)
Beautiful Artwork, Intriguing Story, Interesting Characters
17 September 2003
Warning: Spoilers
This series is one of the newest Animated series on Western shores, and it certainly looks beautiful. The cel artwork is very cleanly drawn with nice thick outlines giving the characters a bold look, and the backgrounds are beautifully done. This series is simply full of wonderfully dramatic images, and even the small, inconsequential shots are simply fun to look at.

The story is also a strong point in the series. Try to avoid spoilers for this series' plot as much as possible. A lot of the enjoyment comes from watching things unfold and witnessing the nature of the world the creators have painted. The twists are hard hitting and the situations are constantly shifting, bad guys and good guys are so difficult to discern because in reality, there are no absolute evil people, just different shades of cruelty. The plot touches on issues like racism, war hatred, xenophobia, homesickness, adolescence, love and more or less everything else.

It's been compared to Neon Genesis Evangelion, and one can see where people see the resemblance, but once one starts watching Rahxephon, one will realize how

fundamentally different the two series are in almost every way. To any Anime fan, or really, to any fan of animation at all, this series is highly recommended, and ADV's DVD presentation of the series is top-notch.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Is this the same director??
18 December 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Note, there may be spoilers in these comments.

I just returned from Ireland's first showing of the film. I was at the first showing on The Fellowship of the Ring last year and was blown away, and I still hold that it was more deserving than "A Beautiful Mind" for last year's "Best Picture" Oscar. It got many things right, the characterizations were perfect, the locals were amazing, set design was top notch, special effects, cinematography, landscapes and script were superb. They couldn't have improved it.

unfortunately it seems that this film was tainted by Hollywood execs who wanted more bucks from this film and padded it full of stuff to bring in a more varied audience. It doesn't work.

Firstly, the film does not have the same focus as the last. The characters are separated, doing different things. In the book, it mostly deals with each group's quest one at a time according to the timeline. in this film, it switches between them constantly, trying to squash all of these events that happened over a certain timeline into a much smaller timeframe. It seems disjointed.

Secondly, there are major story rewrites. This was forgivable in the first film (Face it, Tom Bombadil deserved to be cut, and the sweet scene between Aragorn and Arwen was nice) but in The Two Towers, a full 45 minutes of the film is just invented, padding out the time that should have been spent on the relevant story. Most of these scenes are painfully clichéd and remind one of Fabio romance novels, especially the cover illustrations. Also, Frodo heads to a particular place far too early, a book too early in fact. I'm not looking forward to the rewrites they'll do for Return of the King.

The atmosphere and mood of the film is surprisingly different from the Fellowship. Last year's film was dark, brooding and full of impending doom. Well, if the doom has come in The Two Towers, it wasn't much to worry about. It's full of one-liners. The comedic angle is exploited far too much, at the expense of Gimli's character especially. The first film did an excellent job of portraying the relatively minor characters of Gimli and Legolas. They hate each other at first because of racial differences, but soon grow fond of each other. Gimli's range of emotion is surprisingly versatile, especially seen in the Mines of Moria. Despite the large focus on Gimli's and Legolas's relationship with each other in the book, none of it is present in the film. None.

Set design was another disappointment. Yes, Rohan was a feat that none of it was CGI, but it still looked awful and downright small. The scale in this film, with the notable exception of the Battle at Helm's Deep was far too small. Entire cities we are supposed to care about are not much bigger than the little towns that get ravaged early on.

In the oft-discussed Battle of Helm's Deep, there's a lot to like. Unfortunately, there are at least a dozen times when the focus cuts from the action to a Titanic-esque look at the women and children cowering in the caves. Just one shot of that would be forgivable, but it shows them so much it just becomes annoying.

Also, The film ends before the book does! It handles the three major quests at dif ferent paces; so Frodo's quest takes him into Return of the King territory while the rest of the story leaves off only halfway through!

But there are plenty of good things about the film. The highlight is Gollum. This CGI ch a racter gives the best performance out of anyone in the film! (Even the likes of Gandalf are sub-par in this film, when he returns he is so unlike the character we knew before that one almost wishes the Balrog ate him) Gollum is a triumph of computer animation and his voiceover is excellent as well. There were also a couple moments of visual brilliance, like at Barad-Dûr.

But over all I give this film a 6/10, whereas Fellowship earned a 9/10. It is not a worthy sequel to Fellowship and considering it was all filmed at the same time I am at a loss as to how it could have turned out like this.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Surprising
18 October 2002
It is surprising that a production like this gets made these days, especially for television. Considering the strong sexual themes and explicit lovemaking scenes, not to mention lesbianism, this has been given superb treatment and direction.

The sets and costumes are flawless, the direction is stylish and the characters are likeable. There is a fair amount of humor but it has surprisingly dark interludes. The protagonist is really a tragic figure, but not devoid of happiness. Also, this production avoids the mistake most films/shows make when dealing with homosexuality/lesbianism. The characters are very human. It seems that to allow people to be comfortable with watching gays and lesbians on TV and movies most shows fill it full of cliches and make the characters obsessed with being gay. Not so with this. In Tipping the Velvet, the protagonist is hardly aware of what being lesbian means!

The BBC have made some wonderful productions in the past, and this adventurous period piece only confirms their standard of excellence on all fronts.
42 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
In Memoriam: New York City (2002 TV Movie)
10/10
Tragic and Compelling
4 September 2002
There's little doubt that September 11th was a horrifyingly tragic event of enormous significance, one wonders how modern enlightened times could see such an act. But the advantage of these modern times is that this particular event was widely photographed and recorded. What personally surprised me about it was their use of sound, as the planes hit and as the towers collapsed, one hears the reactions of the onlookers. It adds a human element. The mayor of New York offers a large amount of insight over the course of the film, and there's plenty of footage of him viewing the events unfolding before his eyes. It gives me even more respect for him seeing him at the "front lines" so to speak of the disaster. All of the most haunting elements are present: Clear shots of the giant explosions as the planes impacted, huge pillars of dust as the towers collapse, the aftermath: ghostly figures wandering an unrecognizable Manhattan when visibility is about 5 feet. It is depressing, but essential viewing. Ten Stars. It was a shocking experience witnessing history unfold, and it was also a horrifying experience. Watch it to see the greatest disaster of our time, and watch it to appreciate the disasters of the past, so we don't repeat them.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Catch-22 (1970)
8/10
Anti-War? Nope. Anti Bureaucracy!
21 June 2002
It's always been my opinion that Catch-22 wasn't an anti-war book, after all, before Snowden, Yossarion was a fairly diligent soldier.

This is a film about disillusionment, and a film blasting bureaucracy, rather than war. Among the examples is Major Major Major Major, who was put in a position he didn't want / deserve because that was simple how the system worked.

As an adaption of the excellent novel is it alright, several of the best bits are merely glossed over and some parts could have been sacrificed in favor of more worthy scenes, but it does it's job well. This is probably intended for those who've read the book already, as I expect many will be confused otherwise. The highlight is John Voight as Milo. Even if he'd been in every scene I'd say he was underused.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Lost Spielberg
11 February 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Many years ago, Steven Spielberg's name was only associated with escapist blockbusters. His career was defined by Jaws, Close Encounters of the Third Kind and E.T. the Extra Terrestrial. But now Spielberg is the man behind Schindler's List and Saving Private Ryan. The man who, to many seemed like just a child posing as an adult filmmaker had grown up. But Schindler's List, Private Ryan and A.I. didn't just pop up out of nowhere. Spielberg began looking for respect before that, starting with The Color Purple (1985), which was a good melodrama about African Americans.

After that film, Spielberg began his first real war movie, Empire of the Sun. Adapted from the novel by J.G. Ballard, an autobiography, the film tells the story of twelve year old Jamie, played by twelve year old Christian Bale (Who could put Haley Joel Osment to shame.) He's spoiled British boy living in Shanghai, In a protected area for foreign nationals known as the International Settlement.. China's neighbor, Japan, is readying itself for war.

Jamie knows a lot about the things he really cares about (in this case, fighter aircraft) and is naïve about everything else, especially war. `I want to join the Japanese Air Force,' he muses to his surprised father, after mentioning he liked their planes.

When the film opens he is only beginning to assess the world outside his large house. His family, happy in their seclusion, doesn't help matters.

`We're very lucky, aren't we? To have everything,' he tells his father.

`Yes, well you notice how the harder I work the ‘luckier' we get?' The man retorts, while hitting golf balls into his swimming pool using large coins as tees.

When the Japanese mobilize, chaos ensues, and amid the events that surround and envelop him, he is forced to change from an affluent boy to a survivor.

His fascination with planes presents him with an admiration of the Japanese that eclipses any frustration he would have felt in his situation. One of the more powerful images in the film finds him saluting Kamikaze pilots who are making their final toast to the Emperor, and singing the haunting Welsh lullaby the film opens with (The theme of the hymn is sleep and night). He is, of course, unaware as to what their mission is, but his innocent desire to show his admiration adds a unique perspective. The different perspective is interesting, especially in light of recent events such as the September 11th tragedy. Maybe time heals such wounds. Maybe not.

His change from helpless and snobby to determined and cynical is very gradual, but it is incredibly dramatic, and is one of the best- illustrated character developments put to film. Christian Bale's performance in Empire deserved an Oscar. He truly brought life to the complex character. Also to be noted is John Malkovich, who acts as Jamie's mentor for his new spartan life. He seems to serve as Jamie's dark angel, a man with useful advice, but malevolent intentions of personal gain. Also appearing is Joe Pantoliano (The Matrix) as Malkovich's right-hand-man, and it features a young Ben Stiller. But this paragraph simply can't encompass how well illustrated and deep all these characters are. It literally must be seen to be believed.

It becomes obvious as the film plays out what would have attracted David Lean (the film's original intended director) to the movie. This is an epic, a tale of huge scope. There are scenes with literally thousands of extras on the screen at a time. One can only feel awe in knowing that this was made before computers dominated the movie industry. Every crowd is real. Every plane is real (to an extent.) The whole experience is a feast for the eyes, with several artful shots brining magic to the movie.

With excellent performances of the entire cast, strong filmmaking and visual style and a powerful score by John Williams, Empire of the Sun doesn't deserve to be overlooked. Unfortunately, and it may seem pompous to say this, but audiences weren't ready for this new Spielberg style, and it had a lukewarm reaction at the box office, with one of Spielberg's lowest grosses ever. Being released alongside `The Last Emperor' didn't help matters either. But the fact that it was nominated for 11 Oscars should certainly mean that many people did enjoy it during its release.

(WARNING: This paragraph has slight spoilers. If you haven't seen the film, you may want to skip this paragraph.) One thing to look out for is Spielberg's rather inspired toying with time and memory. He said of the book that `half of it was a lie,' because the memories of the young boy were fragile things that his surroundings twisted. Look out for little details; such as how Jamie's parents stand at his bedside, remarkably similar to the magazine picture he sticks on his wall later in the film. At the end of the film, Spielberg actually sums up what he was trying to say with that little detail through one single split-second shot. As Jamie tries to resurrect his fallen Japanese friend, he's chanting `I can bring everyone back, everyone,' though it is clear there's no saving him. Suddenly, it shows him actually pressing his hands to the chest of a younger version of himself, prim and proper in his school uniform. He's not trying to bring his friend back; he's trying to return to his old self. And he's failing. (END of Spoilers)

Fortunately, this film isn't obscure enough that it's hard to find. Make the effort to see this film. I assure you that you won't regret it.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed