7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Avatar (2009)
8/10
Avatar is an Experience, not a Film!
5 January 2010
Too often people let themselves get caught up in the hype of a thing.

An event is announced that signifies a landmark or return of something momentous and suddenly all hell breaks loose. Some side with blatant aggression, raising pitchforks and lanterns and storming forward with disregard of reason or logic or any kind of care. They only see what they want to see, and nothing's going to satisfy their lust but spilled blood.

Then we have the trolls, who are just as bad.

It's a shame, because many of the opinions you read on Avatar will be skewed by this factor, and while that won't matter on a personal level for most, it could in turn skew the opinion of others into locked down emotion in a similar fashion.

People are easily lead by the opinions of others, and this hype of extremes will play a large part in the way Avatar is heralded.

However, long after the hype has died, once new and better advances have been made, will Avatar stand with the genre classics as a timeless piece of film-making?

I'm not entirely sure.

There's no denying Avatar is a fantastic achievement in terms of visual design and implementation. Every penny of the budget is on screen for us to devour. This isn't something to be watched, it's something to be /experienced/. Fully. Throughout the movie I was /there/, on Pandora, sucking in the air and gasping in time with the characters at the beauty of this wondrous new world that Cameron's created.

The CGI is almost seamless. The motion capture technology developed for the film has breathed life into the CGI characters like nothing I've ever seen. Usually with CGI events I scrutinise for flaws and joins and actively hunt for the strings, scissors at the ready, but this time I wasn't even given the chance to catch my breath long enough to focus, let alone handle a pair of scissors with that much precision!

The 3D is great. It's not heavy handed, nor is it used in a gimmicky way to excite the audience. It merely heightens the reality of Pandora, especially in the aerial scenes where my sense of vertigo was triggered on more than one occasion. At times it almost felt like there was too much to take in, and repeated viewings might be essential to grasp the full visual value.

I honestly think anyone denying this film is a remarkable technical achievement is in denial about something else entirely. I just wouldn't buy it. It's /that/ good.

Just as the Na'vi 'jack-in' to Pandora, I felt jacked-in to Avatar. It flowed into me in euphoric waves of excitement and awe and for the first time in a long time, I felt the ice of my cynical adult expectations thaw and the child-like wonder I thought I'd lost took my hand and led me through the jungles of this beautifully realised world.

The action is masterfully handled. A wondrous return to the old-school of long panned shots and well considered space, and the editing is smooth and consistent. There's no ROTF huddles of incomprehension, or shaky cam for the sake of cool nonsense, this is Cameron showing the kids how it's done.

The story itself is a very clear-cut case of 'Good' Vs 'Evil'. This simplicity will no doubt turn off some who hunger for something meatier to chow on, but for me the simplicity was a strength. It was Jake's journey that hooked me, and a convoluted and 'smart' plot would have bogged that down and over complicated the pure emotion of it all.

The acting is very fine for the most part. Lines are delivered with conviction and real emotion and this helped a great deal in overcoming some of the issues I've mentioned so far as, regardless of them all, I was still given a very solid impression of each character's personality and their metaphorical weight within the universe. I found both Weaver and Saldana especially intense and alive, Worthington very watchable and warm, and Lang suitably bad-ass and believably threatening.

However, the lack of depth of exposition and in the relationships between the characters left some of the potentially most affecting moments of the story unsatisfying and gave the film a slightly hollow feel in places. And while the spectacle of the visuals and the emotional impact of the individual performance themselves certainly carried me along with the emotions of each scene, I didn't connect with everything in a way that would have made me hail this as the instant classic I've been hoping it would be since it was announced.

Also, the historical allegory the film makes to our imperialistic nature as a species could be misconstrued by some as a political commentary on contemporary events, which might cause some confusion and alienate potential viewers. I never felt like I was being preached to, and for the most I felt like I was discovering these truths along side Jake, and even though I was never as surprised as he was, it still felt like the revelations were part of a fiction rather than a lecture.

Perhaps my expectations were too high given the quality of Cameron's previous efforts, but there is one thing that I absolutely cannot deny: the overall sense of awe this film generated transported me on a magical journey that felt exactly like I was experiencing an alien world, like I was breathing the air, running with Jake through the training grounds as we both marvelled at his new avatar body, and cheering with the natives as they gathered their strength and courage to defend their homeland. It felt like I was a child again experiencing wonder for the first time.

And that's something very rare indeed.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Solid action, awful story.
30 December 2009
There's really not much to write about, so I'll keep this brief.

The film delivers where it needs to. The gun battles are extremely satisfying (especially the sound effects), the hand-to-hand combat is brutal and in places quite creative, and some of the sequences are amongst the best I've seen from straight to DVD action.

A few scenes stuck out as particularly well done: A sequence with Van Damme entering a building and systematically taking out the terrorists with only his knife was excellent. The inevitable Van Damme Vs Lundgren confrontation won't disappoint either, with walls being demolished and windows shattered as the two legends fling each other about with scant disregard for the structural integrity of the building surrounding them.

The main antagonist is played by Andrei Arlovski, a UFC champion, he really is an excellent fighter and his scenes are just as fun (and my favourite parts of the film).

Don't expect a coherent story, it's absolutely ridiculous. And anyone expecting to see Van Damme in new light after JCVD will be severely disappointed, he's almost comatose thought the entire film. No other members of the cast are worth a mention.

Strictly for action buffs, this film is a lot of fun if you're prepared to only turn your brain off, but completely remove it from your cranium for the duration.

4/5 for action, 1/5 for the film itself.
14 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pandorum (2009)
7/10
Great, but by no means perfect.
16 November 2009
Reviews have been overly negative, so I went into it with slightly shallow expectations (even though the trailer did pique my interest).

However, I was very pleasantly surprised by one of the coolest Sci-Fi films I've seen in a very long time.

From the off I was absolutely drawn into the plight of the two men trying to fight off paranoia, claustrophobia, panic, etc... while the desperation of their situation bore down on them. The set pieces were exceptionally well done, and the first section of the film is hugely atmospheric and tense.

Going any further is going to require spoilers. All I can say is please, if you haven't heard anything about this film yet, DON'T go looking for more info. Stay away from the IMDb boards especially. While you could enjoy this even if the plot was spoilt for you, it'll be much more effective if you let it unravel with no further knowledge.

The film covers every base for me in terms of what a decent sci-fi experience should: memorable characters and set-pieces, a plot that develops and twists (mostly) naturally,, a great transition from perceived situation to reality, and it doesn't ever feel dumbed down or the future science forced or unbelievable.

The only flaws I can mention without spoiling are: -Some parts of whispered dialogue are annoyingly low -Some of the editing is a little confusing at times. -Some of the action moments are a little over the top (I'd have preferred more tension and less hands on, but it's not a film breaker and it's still fun to watch) -The way the back story is explained isn't absolutely efficient, and if you're not paying attention 100%, you could miss out on a couple of key elements and be left a little confused as to what exactly happened.

I'd highly recommend this to fans of sci-fi such as Aliens, and Event Horizon, and while this film will no doubt be compared ad nauseum to the aforementioned, and while it doesn't' ever re-invent the reactor core, it DOES add up to more than the sum of its parts.

A well crafted and hugely enjoyable experience, but not without its flaws. Recommended.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
District 9 (2009)
8/10
A very competently made piece of sci-fi (contains spoilers).
8 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I really enjoyed this film.

-

The main protagonist was brilliantly 'written' (he ad libbed his lines) and portrayed. I found the technique produced a very realistic and engaging character who was very human and reacted to each situation like an average, slightly cowardly worker drone would.

There was no leap from human to super killing machine as there usually with this plot type (The Matrix, Star Wars, etc..), what we see is a highly flawed man being thrust into a fantastical situation and stumbling through it with his negative traits flaring and dictating his behaviour. The only reason he manages to pull off what he does is his ability to use the vastly superior alien tech, and even then he uses it ineptly and frustratingly just like an untrained person would.

(and before anyone gets on this, the aliens were so easily subdued because they lacked the intelligence to use the tech efficiently. Christopher and his son were anomalies.)

I really liked that it took the entire film for the protagonist to realise the flaws in his ideals and opinions regarding the Prawns, and that the only real reason this occurred was due to his transformation and subsequent ostracism from his fellow man. The kind of prejudices he held before would only ever be broken by something so drastic.

That my emotions towards Wikus flitted between sympathy, support, and disgust, only cemented my opinion that the character was portrayed effectively and realistically.

-

The relationship between Wikus and his family and friends didn't need to be portrayed any deeper. We were given all we needed to make the human connection with him at the start. A director doesn't need to spoon feed the audience to achieve this, he just needs to be efficient and I believe, in this case, he was.

-

The Sci-fi elements were perfectly done. I was satisfied with the explanations and techno-speak. I honestly see any criticism here to be highly pedantic and pretentious.

Also, the argument that humanoid aliens who can breath our atmosphere is lazy is a ridiculous one. It's as much of an assumption that alien life would differ from us so as it is that it would share similarities. Again, pedantic and pointless.

-

I've read that some people believe the film to be racist toward Nigerians. Bullshit. The film portrayed HUMANS as intolerant, greedy, malicious, etc... That we have a group of Nigerian militia in a country that is rife with such groups was as realistic and fair as the rest of it.

-

The action here was 100% better than the over-blown trash that Mr Bay produced earlier in the year. It was clear, humorous. awkward (a good representation of the ineptness of the protagonist), and the effects were stupendous.

-

The ending: I love how open they left it, and I don't believe it was done to leave room for a sequel. It felt much more like the director wanted his audience to go away with mixed emotions and aspirations for the characters and events and letting them fill in the rest for themselves. I love it when film-makers do this effectively, which is very rare.

Of course, if there is a sequel I won't be disappointed unless I'm disappointed. :p

-

My main criticism of the film is the over-use of Wikus' hesitance and awkwardness to produce tension. Even though I consider it realistic in keeping with his character, the frustration I felt toward him at times (taking far too long to get into the mech-suit, running from the highly inferior human soldiers while using the mech suit, etc..) was quite off- putting.

-

So, yeh, I enjoyed the film. It was a very competently directed, acted, and written piece of science-fiction that took clichéd themes and added human elements that are very rare to the genre.

Highly recommended to all sci-fi fans.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
For fans of the series only, one of the coolest fanfics I've seen.
11 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
-slight spoilers-

There's not really much else to say. It's very short, but if you enjoy the mythology of the Cenobites this will be a real treat for you.

They pack more effectiveness into 6 minutes than most of the straight to DVD films managed in hours, it's also the most original spin I've experienced on a franchise for some time.

Even without Douglas Bradley this manages to work very well. the use of an older actor adds to the final lament of the most famous Cenobite. This could be considered an alternative 'ending' to bloodlines, and it's one I found much more satisfying.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The history of The Batman has always been drowned in darkness.
7 August 2008
The city that spawned the violence that gave birth to the Dark Knight himself; the psychotic emulators that Bruce unwittingly coded; the constant struggle within to maintain a strict moral code - not to lose himself completely to the darkness he shrouds himself in out of necessity... all these elements add to a dark, brooding and violent mythology that Nolan manages to capture perfectly without ever giving in to the gratuitous.

While the film is gloriously over-the-top (which is of course fitting for a comic book universe), Nolan manages to ground the larger than life characters and story arcs just enough to add a chill and striking reality to them (Heath Ledger's performance as The Joker is especially stunning).

A perfect example of violence (both the physical now and the mental histories) and tragedy handled with real care and attention, TDK stands as testament not only as a marker for other comic book adaptations, but as an expert example of how to do darkness without dealing in the absolutes that shallow the usual attempts.

A chaotic and brilliant masterpiece.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Some satisfying scenes for gore fiends and some beautiful shots...
27 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
won't make up for a shallow script and some horrid miscasting.

Also one of the major ideas contained in the source material was completely ignored: that the vampires - having at one time in the past been hunted by man and driven to the point of extinction - had spent centuries fading into myth to preserve their species and now that security is found threatened by the actions of the vampires in Barrow.

Also a side effect of emitting the above content meant losing the conflict between the vampire Elder Vicente and the hot-headed and ambitious Marlow which would have given great insight into the motives and structures of the vampire community.

It's not terribly important, but it sure adds some depth to the vampires history and shows just how vulnerable and susceptible to human failing they really are.

As it is I found a rather shallow and unsatisfying 113 minutes. Disappointing but not terrible.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed