Change Your Image
shakavo-2
I worked on a show called "The King of Queens"
I decided I hate TV.
I'm back on the east coast.
I'm going to school for computer programming.
I like the Godfather, Video games, and steak.
I play the guitar and trumpet.
I like ice hockey (go Kings).
I didn't invent purple.com, it is an accidental discovery that I find amusing.
I have to go.
[dance]
Reviews
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002)
Two Towers would be better if coupled with Fellowship.
The Two Towers follows in the footsteps of its predecessor in terms of its incredible sets, exceptional costume design, and top-notch CGI. It is certainly one of the best looking epics ever shot, and the battle scenes rival (but do not surpass) the intensity of Braveheart's. I cannot say enough about Gollum. I will say that a best supporting actor nomination is a slim chance for Andy Serkis although the honor would be well deserved. Gollum's CGI origins are not easily detected as I was expecting, and WETA's ability to create a photo realistic computer generated character should be celebrated for years to come. Serkis' performance rounds out what may be one of film's greatest achievements. In the same light, the Ents were amazingly designed and compelling. They did not raise my 'this is CGI' flag. Great job.
These elements help keep the movie from tanking. Jackson and company have undertaken a project of magnificent scope in The Two Towers; so magnificent that it barely fits into three hours. There is no doubt in my mind that the cutting room floor is home to the extra characterization and emotion that this film has forsaken to pave the way for all of the action needed to tell the vast story. Fellowship brought tears to my eyes on a couple of occasions. Towers almost did once. As someone else put it, (The Two Towers feels like a whole lot of middle). I agree, and look forward to the extended edition.
It may help to think of The Two Towers as just part of a movie. It is almost unfair to judge only part of a movie. The first and third part may stand alone better than the middle part, but I believe that a full realization of the films will come when we are able to sit down and watch all three in a row - possibly the extended editions.
It is unfortunate that the money making machine known as the box office sways studios from risky decisions such as releasing a 3 1/2 hr. movie, but it is business - and nobody wants to lose money.
Score - 8 out of 10 for great visuals, action, and performances.
Goblin (1993)
Bad, Okay.
Goblin is not a fun movie to watch, as silly movies should be. If it didn't take itself as seriously as it did, maybe I would have considered rating it a 4 or 5. I can't honestly say that the movie is fresh in my mind, (having viewed it over 5 years ago), but a bad impression that lasts as long as this one warrants a warning to my fellow movie viewers. Watch out for the Goblin.