Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
An Ideal Husband (I) (1999)
8/10
Unexpectedly enjoyable film full of Wilde wit
14 April 1999
I thought that An Ideal Husband would be just another costume drama, but I was pleasantly surprised when I went to see the film.

The film centres on professional bachelor and tireless socialite Arthur Goring (Rupert Everett) who we first see "the morning after". He is a man of elegant idleness, but he is forced to act when his friend Sir Robert Chiltern (Jeremy Northam) gets caught up in a delicate matter which threatens his rising political career, and marriage to Gertrude (Cate Blanchett).

To complicate matters, two women are trying to change Arthur's single status: the charmingly persistent Mabel (Minnie Driver), sister of Sir Robert; and the manipulative Mrs Cheveley (Julianne Moore). In amongst this tangled web of lies, temptations and misunderstanding, Arthur Goring must find a way of sorting out not only his friend's lives, but also his own.

The reason this film succeeds is mostly due to its base material, a play by Oscar Wilde. Director Oliver Parker has thankfully done little to try and modernise Wilde's work and has thus kept the sparkling dialogue intact and indeed, it is still relevant in today's society. In addition, Parker and Wilde manage to create convincing characters, both male and female, who are beautifully portrayed by the starry cast - all uniformly excellent.

The production design is of a very high standard so the film looks good, and the cinematography by David Johnson (who was perhaps the best thing about Hilary and Jackie) is outstanding too.

The only flaw to the film is that, for all its charms, it never looks like falling into the bracket of a "masterpiece". But, like the character of Arthur Goring, the film realises its limitations.

So, to sum up, An Ideal Husband is a delightful film which, whilst not making any serious point, will certainly keep you entertained.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Enjoyable jump from TV series but not good enough
13 April 1999
I really enjoy the Rugrats on TV. I'm into most animated cartoons but the Rugrats is something special because of its gentle yet biting take on the world.

The Rugrats Movie feels more than just an episode stretched for the screen. The addition of a new character, baby Dil, into the mix gives rise to a whole new set of interactions between Chucky, Phil and Lil, Angelica and Tommy.

However, I didn't get the same sense of awe I got from The Lion King or Antz, or the sense of humour and emotion found in Toy Story or A Bugs Life.

Those are truly great pieces of animation, The Rugrats Movie is only good.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great trailer, shame about the film
13 April 1999
I was very impressed with the trailer for this film, starring Robert Carlyle and Jonny Lee Miller as two highwaymen robbing the rich... and keeping it for themselves. By setting you up for just another costume drama, and then proceeding to blast the corsets apart in a riotous mix of imagery and sound.

However, when I got to see the film, I began to see the flaws. The opening section is very dark and sets the scene well, but drags on too much. The middle part is perhaps the best, with some great set piece scenes - an extravagant ballroom dancing scene played out like a Friday nightclub, the raid on the dinner party. Then the final part falls into the usual hackneyed formulaic conclusion.

It's a pity because there are a lot of things I do like about the film. The use of music (by Craig Armstrong, strings arranger to the stars) is extremely good and the support lent by Alan Cumming and Alan Stott as, respectively an over-the-top dandy and a dour "thief-taker" rounds out the film a bit more.

Unfortunately, Liv Tyler, as the love interest (who actually gets to wield some guns), has a pretty underwritten part. The locations are suitably dirty but I can't help feeling I've seen it before. And despite their best efforts Carlyle and Miller never quite lift the script above the "mildly engrossing" level.

Basically, for a film which advertises itself as being about action and characters, it doesn't have enough of either. All it has is the promise of a better movie, and a catchy tagline: "They rob the rich - and that's it". Director Jake Scott will probably do a lot better in the future.

Plunkett & Macleane is ultimately a film that, despite trying its hardest, fails to deliver the goods. And that's it.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed