Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The problem of seeing too clearly...
7 May 1999
I just saw this film and found it to be one of the best depictions of this century's malaise I've ever seen, viewed through the eyes of the character Charles and his friends.

Charles is a nucleus of concern for his friends Micheal, Alberte, and Edwige. They devote much of their time doting on him and worrying over him, because he cannot find solace in anything...consumerism, environmental destruction, and greed have created a vacuum of disillusionment that these young characters live in, and Charles, above all, sees no way out--he finds this world disgusting, but dying to escape it just as pointless as trying to succeed in it and contribute to it.

Every scene and shot in this film is drained of warmth and vitality. It is as though everyone in the world has succumbed to the acceptance of industrialized mechanization and their own resulting powerlessness. Many shots do not even show the faces of people, just their anonymous bodies walking, their heads cut off. The acting is deliberately minimal and understated. In this drained world, there is never a glimmer of hope depicted for anyone.

But this isn't bad! What makes this film so great, in essence what I think makes much of Bresson's work so powerful, is its simple willingness to show things as they really are. While the others in the film cling to naive hopes for a "revolution," Charles has crossed over to an existential enlightenment of sorts...he fully sees that overthrowing the government or any challenge to authority is useless when it is all of humanity itself that guides and allows for the persistance of a destructive status quo. As he tells the psychologist: "My only problem is that I see too clearly."

And that is a problem, if one doesn't have any means for spiritual sustenance or some way to move on from there...and many people don't. Le Diable probablement makes it clear that for some, there are no institutions, no places in society to ultimately gather strength or support from. Giving up is their only option. As in his film Mouchette, Bresson depicts just this type of person as acheiving almost a state of grace in their refusal to accept what they are expected to accept...and paying the ultimate price for it. While suicide should never be celebrated, the beauty and clarity of the depiction of the mechanisms that lead to the character's suicide in Bresson's films is to be applauded.

****
74 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
convoluted with truths
18 March 1999
It is true what many people have been writing about this film: it's quite an untwined mess. There are so may ideas and themes, but nothing seems to thread them together into any kind of cohesiveness. But the two themes of surveillance and disappearing intrigued me...in Los Angeles, it really does seem like you could disappear by joining up with Mexican gardeners, even if you stood out among them as being of a different race; this city is run by a "visible underground" of minority workers who do a lot of the labor-type work for the comparatively fewer upper-classes. It's nothing new but it's a simple reminder by Wenders about how race and perception of status still hold powerful sway in contemporary America. Government surveillance for the ostensible reason of protection already exists: in L.A., you see cameras everywhere, especially at busy intersections to catch "red light runners." But who else is watching? Essentially, Wenders is capitalizing on themes that are very real and current in the modern world, but again, there is no cohesion. Explanations are seemingly nonexistent. Is he trying to say that we really don't have any way to truly know what larger forces are controlling and/or monitoring our lives? Still a worthwhile film, but definitely not his best.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed