Hunters Lodge (2016) User Reviews

A Slow, No Budget Yawner

[knightox · 4/10 · 30 May 2019]

As someone else said, this cheap flick could have been condensed into 30 minutes. The unnecessary "flashing" flashbacks got old real fast. Yeah it was just like the rest of the plot and the supposed twist ending. Speaking of those flashbacks, the directors didn't pay much attention to their US military history. Blackhawk helicopters were NEVER used in the Vietnam War! They hadn't even been invented yet. Not exactly the kind of "ghost story" I was looking for.

Low budget 'who dunnit'

[archcarlospereira · 2/10 · 4 June 2017]

I gave it a 2 as I watched until the end...nothing better to do on a lazy Sunday afternoon, but at least I got to see the twist just before the credits!

Most of the action occurs in a Hunter's lodge out in the sticks. The building seems to be a TARDIS...small(ish) from the outside, but quite a intricate layout internally with fire safety evacuation signage throughout, like when found in a hotel or HMO.

Shows What You Can Do With A Tiny Budget

[deager · 8/10 · 26 January 2019]

The director, writer, cinematographer, actors in the small thriller show that you can make a decent, exciting movie with little budget. Not perfect, but still very good. Ending could use some work, but not terribly unsatisfying. Leads were good, a number of familiar faces from British TV shows. Effort to make it seem a USA location almost pulled off, seemed more Canadian, but made in UK. Director used some very interesting camera and lighting trickicks with his cinematographer that worked just as well, if not better, than spending lots of money on poor CGI. Overall a good time spent.

A Candidate for fast forwarding

[philcroucher-37667 · 14 April 2017]

There are probably no reviews because nobody coul bear to watch it to the end.

This whole film could have been done in twenty minutes if you take out the weird flashbacks which youcan safely skip through.

I think you would have more fun with a root canal.