2 previous reviews here - at opposite ends, which generally means the film may be worth watching. unfortunately, this wasn't. it had potential, but i believe ms. Mamet, the director, writer and star of this work, lacks the depth her father has always had. as a director, she might have gained some insight in how to get the most from her actors but her own lack of acting acumen prevents her from achieving anything truly moving. as writer, she has some good ideas here, but far too juvenile to make the grade. i'd guess with her pedigree, doors were opened that are closed to the rest of us. maybe in about 5 years she'll have a bit more life experience from which to draw a decent story or two.
7 Reviews
Quite the worst film imaginable
j_smith_721 December 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I'll start by saying there is nothing whatsoever in any way, shape, form or style that could ever possibly justify why this film should have been made. And I include within that the presence of the usually marvellous actor, William H. Macy. Clara Mamet needs to hang her head in shame for allowing the Mamet name to be associated with something truly this awful. Its juvenile - indeed, infantile - premise defies adequately logical description and there can only be one possible reason to confirm why this 'story' ever made it on to film. Nepotism.
There is not one single believable moment in the entire muddy dreariness this film wades through let alone a single credible character. In addition, the dialogue stinks...really, really stinks...and has no merit attached to it whatsoever. Added to this are some meaninglessly 'surreal' dream scenes which were clearly added to pad out what is a very flimsy idea.
Somebody in the Mamet household needs to take Clara to a quiet corner and shake her. Then, shake her again. After that, she needs to be taken to get a job in a fast food joint some place and leave her there for around 5 years. If she ever wants to use her father's name to make another film then, at least after some real life experience, she may possibly have an idea worthy of putting on film. Because, for sure, this is not it. Dreadful.
There is not one single believable moment in the entire muddy dreariness this film wades through let alone a single credible character. In addition, the dialogue stinks...really, really stinks...and has no merit attached to it whatsoever. Added to this are some meaninglessly 'surreal' dream scenes which were clearly added to pad out what is a very flimsy idea.
Somebody in the Mamet household needs to take Clara to a quiet corner and shake her. Then, shake her again. After that, she needs to be taken to get a job in a fast food joint some place and leave her there for around 5 years. If she ever wants to use her father's name to make another film then, at least after some real life experience, she may possibly have an idea worthy of putting on film. Because, for sure, this is not it. Dreadful.
Nepotism rules supreme
SamUnfiltered197915 November 2019
Two bit waltz is what happen when a really good directors child gets to direct a movie because their daddy is a director. Clara Mamet is a cinematic train wreck.
She has no acting ability. Unless you call doing a Ellen Page in Juno impression in every show and movie she is in a talent. Her writing skills have the intellectual depth of a kiddie pool at Six Flags. Her directing skills are on par with a 6 year old teaching a poodle to jump through a hoop. I am mad that Mamet was allowed the funds and resources to make this turd of a movie when other good directors struggle so hard but don't have the luck to be the offspring of a really good Director. This movie shows why Mamet has not directed anything since. Check out her fathers movies. But this is overwhelming proof as to why Nepotism should be banned in Hollywood. Or at least change the spelling of Nepotism to C-L-A-R-A M-A-M-E-T.
Godawful
srusciano30 October 2023
We can tell how this movie got made by watching it: Brainless, self-centered twit is too dim to realize that she knows nothing and should definitely continue her education, so she writes a film script and, lo and behold, her writer dad tells her she's really got something. Unfortunately, he's dead wrong.
If I hadn't seen this during a pre-screening where the director was present, I would have walked out instead of sitting through this with saintly patience, and I wouldn't have been alone. No one present valued the experience, and we were a forgiving bunch as we suffered through an interview and Q & A that made it very clear that Clara Mamet is as vacuous as her effort here. When asked why she included a brief scene where her character had an absurd number of lit cigarettes in her mouth at once, she responded that she really likes smoking. Pure unapologetic narcissism, through and through, as if we couldn't already tell from her work.
The reputable critic who reviewed this film and likened Ms. Mamet to Buster Keaton should probably consult a surgeon to have his tongue removed from her father's rectum. It should never have been made.
If I hadn't seen this during a pre-screening where the director was present, I would have walked out instead of sitting through this with saintly patience, and I wouldn't have been alone. No one present valued the experience, and we were a forgiving bunch as we suffered through an interview and Q & A that made it very clear that Clara Mamet is as vacuous as her effort here. When asked why she included a brief scene where her character had an absurd number of lit cigarettes in her mouth at once, she responded that she really likes smoking. Pure unapologetic narcissism, through and through, as if we couldn't already tell from her work.
The reputable critic who reviewed this film and likened Ms. Mamet to Buster Keaton should probably consult a surgeon to have his tongue removed from her father's rectum. It should never have been made.
Quirky, Funny, Highly-Recommended Film!
shominy-491-65235528 December 2014
If you are tired of movies that are "downers" - full of torture, violence, war, the apocalypse, drugs, zombies, vampires - this film is a breath of fresh air. It's quirky, funny, totally off-the-wall and thoroughly enjoyable! Maude is a teenager in trouble at school but the situations are funny! (Her school counselor is great!) Maude's home life is definitely not normal (and rather bizarre) - yet it is funny! Maude's frequent (yet brief) therapy sessions are funny! Maude's imagination is funny! Maude's mother is like no other movie mother - and so funny! The slick editing of this film does not give you a dull moment! The dialogue is quirky and funny and unique! We rent a lot of independent movies and have to say that we enjoy them much more than almost all mainstream movies we rent. Highly recommend if you like films that are quirky, creative, unique, and funny!
Depressing and confusing... a great rhyme
bellino-angelo201416 July 2023
While I am not a huge David Mamet fan I enjoyed most of his movies and think he's a good director. Since he's so famous his daughter Clara decided to direct and star in a movie... with disastrous results. And considering that there are only 5 reviews with three that give it 1s and one that gives it a 10 it seems like a polarizing movie.
Maude (Mamet) is a 18 year old girl that seems to live a perfect life until she is suspended from school for expressing her creative vein, loses one of her best friends when she has to move for job reasons and has a relationship with another boy but after a while he leaves her because he lost interest. So she finds some happiness in writing her novel but after a while she'll have the writers' block and things go awry. That's it folks.
To say that TWO BIT WALTZ is terrible is an understatement. Our lead was seen not only as a desperate loser, but also like a stupid that can't manage to have nothing going right in her life. The acting was lazy by all, including by talented William Macy as the careless dad that doesn't even care if he sleeps on the couch or on the toilet seat, or even if there is food in the kitchen. As for the other characters, they acted more like bad caricatures than normal people. And there were some dream sequences where Gloria imagines to be in a grass field and some people with the heads of elephants, rabbits and small birds and other people dressed in horse, lion and bear costumes that stand alone or dance in the grass... it just made me feel stupider. Oh and let me talk about few of the nasty moments:
1) The family goes to visit the grandmother on her death bed and as they come, she dies instantly. That's funny for some uh?
2) When Maude is suspended from school nobody except the mother seemed to care in the least, like if it's ok to have such a marvellous daughter (pun intended)
3) When the family goes to a psychiatrist (David Paymer) he scolds the family after some minutes and when she meets Maude out of the building he tells her ''Do me a w**k''. I can't say the full word because of IMDB standards, but it seriously makes you wonder about the depiction of psychiatry in movies and TV shows, and I assume that in real life he would have been fired ASAP!
Overall, a terrible movie caused not by nepotism but thanks to a terrible script that must have cost 5 cents, sleep-walking acting, the aforementioned nasty moments and some fantasy sequences so jarring that defy description. Easy to skip unless you love to see talented actors in embarassing performances.
Maude (Mamet) is a 18 year old girl that seems to live a perfect life until she is suspended from school for expressing her creative vein, loses one of her best friends when she has to move for job reasons and has a relationship with another boy but after a while he leaves her because he lost interest. So she finds some happiness in writing her novel but after a while she'll have the writers' block and things go awry. That's it folks.
To say that TWO BIT WALTZ is terrible is an understatement. Our lead was seen not only as a desperate loser, but also like a stupid that can't manage to have nothing going right in her life. The acting was lazy by all, including by talented William Macy as the careless dad that doesn't even care if he sleeps on the couch or on the toilet seat, or even if there is food in the kitchen. As for the other characters, they acted more like bad caricatures than normal people. And there were some dream sequences where Gloria imagines to be in a grass field and some people with the heads of elephants, rabbits and small birds and other people dressed in horse, lion and bear costumes that stand alone or dance in the grass... it just made me feel stupider. Oh and let me talk about few of the nasty moments:
1) The family goes to visit the grandmother on her death bed and as they come, she dies instantly. That's funny for some uh?
2) When Maude is suspended from school nobody except the mother seemed to care in the least, like if it's ok to have such a marvellous daughter (pun intended)
3) When the family goes to a psychiatrist (David Paymer) he scolds the family after some minutes and when she meets Maude out of the building he tells her ''Do me a w**k''. I can't say the full word because of IMDB standards, but it seriously makes you wonder about the depiction of psychiatry in movies and TV shows, and I assume that in real life he would have been fired ASAP!
Overall, a terrible movie caused not by nepotism but thanks to a terrible script that must have cost 5 cents, sleep-walking acting, the aforementioned nasty moments and some fantasy sequences so jarring that defy description. Easy to skip unless you love to see talented actors in embarassing performances.
Slightly more or slightly less confusing.
nogodnomasters10 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Clara Mamet wrote, directed, and starred in this quirky indie comedy. Maude (Mamet) is a depressed dead-pan teen who broods about life. She has a very active imagination, which is presented to us, and lives with a dysfunctional family. Dad (William H. Macy) reads books while laying under the furniture. Her younger brother (Jared Gilman) has 10 slices of toast for breakfast and looks at life as if he had a camera. Mom (Rebecca Pidgeon-real life mom too) is totally clueless about life as she says, "It's college. I wonder what they do there?"
The setting for the film appears to be circa 70's plus or minus a decade. In order to appreciate this film, you must pay attention to the dialogue as well as the background setting as it all circles back. The meaning of the title is explained near the end of the film. Her best friend is Jenny. played by Ella Dershowitz, another celebrity child.
It is the type of film you would want to watch twice to pick up stuff you missed the first time. Great first effort in this semi-biographical tale.
Guide: F-bomb. No sex or nudity.
The setting for the film appears to be circa 70's plus or minus a decade. In order to appreciate this film, you must pay attention to the dialogue as well as the background setting as it all circles back. The meaning of the title is explained near the end of the film. Her best friend is Jenny. played by Ella Dershowitz, another celebrity child.
It is the type of film you would want to watch twice to pick up stuff you missed the first time. Great first effort in this semi-biographical tale.
Guide: F-bomb. No sex or nudity.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
