The Real Wolfman (TV Movie 2009) Poster

(2009 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Many mistakes in research
bathrick31 July 2012
Show makes many incorrect assumptions based on ignorance of history, especially of firearms in the 18th century. Some of these assumptions are not important, but questioning assumptions lead to questioning results.

At the end of the show, the ballistics tests on silver bullets are seriously flawed. They use rifles in the test deciding that silver bullets are less accurate than lead. Rifling is rare in the eighteenth century which leads to results which are inaccurate. They also use modern gunpowder, much more powerful than old black powder also leading to inaccurate results. Can you trust the findings of such sloppy experiments?
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
disappointing and shocked that the hosts "got along"
bdwilneralex2 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I'm surprised to see myself penning this, as I'm a genteel, educated fellow. However, if I were George Deuchar, and I encountered that jackass hippie trash Ken Gerhard, I would have honey dipped his a*s for openers. The kid is just so obnoxious and offputting and, to say the least, having written a trashy, poorly researched book about giant bird observations across the American Midwest in the 1970s does _not_ qualify him to research the Beast of Gevaudan. So, any (four) stars earned derive solely from George's patience putting up with his revolting "research partner." I would have stranded him in France and left a dead homeless person chained to him by the waist for him to explain to the police!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed