"The Twilight Zone" The Obsolete Man (TV Episode 1961) Poster

(TV Series)

(1961)

User Reviews

Review this title
50 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Fantastic dystopian tale; - Twilight Zone style
Coventry12 July 2019
Save the best for last, Rod Serling must have thought! The second season of his magnificent TV-creation "The Twilight Zone" has seen a handful of truly terrific episodes (notably "The Howling Man", "Eye of the Beholder", "Twenty-Two" and "Shadow Play") but in the humble opinion of yours truly this "The Obsolete Man" is the most astounding of them all. And, although I've yet to review three entire seasons after this, I'm already fairly certain this episode will turn up again quite high in my ultimate series' top 10.

I'm a tremendous fanatic of dystopian Sci-Fi tales, especially if they are intelligent and realistic enough to downright petrify you. In the good old tradition of "1984", "Fahrenheit 451" and "Brave New World", "The Obsolete Man" creates a downright nightmarish vision of society in an undefined future. In the totalitarian regime, referred to only as The State, people who don't serve a supposedly useful purpose or contribute anything are quickly declared "obsolete" and sentenced to death. With books being forbidden and burned some years ago already, former librarian Romney Wordsworth also gets condemned by a merciless and avidly fanatic chancellor. But, from the moment you lay eyes upon him, you'll see that Mr. Wordsworth is a literate and very sophisticated person, and so the place and circumstances of the execution that he chooses for himself will hold some surprises in store.

"The Obsolete Man" has a brilliant plot, courtesy of Rod Serling himself, but many others contribute a great deal as well. Director Elliot Silverstein, in his first of four episodes for "The Twilight Zone", terrifically captures the stoic and nihilistic atmosphere of a dystopian sci-fi tale (especially during the courtroom sequences). The show's regular cinematographer George T. Clemens delivers some of his best work with the menacing positioning of the camera. Last but not least, the performances of both Burgess Meredith and Fritz Weaver are nothing short of staggering. Their characters are complete opposites, obviously, but their chemistry is practically burning holes in the screen.
22 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Rod Serling at his Best
Loren-325 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I first saw this episode when it was originally aired in 1961 and have since collected it on LaserDisc. Even seeing it with the eyes of an inexperienced 10 year old, the power and message it carried, compressed into a half-hour time-bomb, was at least as formidable as what was meant to destroy the librarian Romney Wordsworth. Meredith and Weaver both turn in laser-like performances, guided skillfully by the words of Mr. Serling's pen. It also benefits from the simplicity of the sets and the always-present black and white format, which I believe creates a greater focus on the characters.

It is episodes like this that ensure that the names Rod Serling and The Twilight Zone will be remembered and honored for excellence in television for a very long time to come.
43 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This Episode Rocks!!!
daleja-dale21 March 2013
I watch this episode, "The Obsolete Man" last week on MeTV and it has to be just about the best episode of any series I watched so far! It has highly thought provoking themes to it! It takes stabs at totalitarianism in Government and also has a good religious theme to it as well (which is the thing I enjoyed most about it)! It was very well acted by Burgess Meredith (an actor who's films I almost always enjoy),the shows hero, and by Fritz Weaver, playing the shows villain! Now I know why the series "The Twilight Zone has ratings over 9 out of 10! It's because of intelligent episodes like this! I challenge anyone to show me any mindless, violence and special effects filled action film that can stand up to this "Twilight Zone" masterpiece!
25 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Last and Best Episode of the Second Season
claudio_carvalho7 July 2018
In a totalitarian and atheistic society in the future where books are destroyed, the librarian Romney Wordsworth is declared obsolete and sentenced to death by the Chancellor. The librarian believes in God and has a discussion with the Chancellor that allows him to choose how he would be executed. Romney requests a personal assassin that will be the only person to know how he would choose to die and his execution broadcast live to the nation. Near the scheduled hour, Rommey summons the Chancellor to his apartment and discloses that there is a hidden bomb to kill him. He gets his forbidden Bible to read and when the Chancellor tries to leave the place, he finds that the door is locked. What will be his attitude?

"The Obsolete Man" is the last and best episode of the Second Season of "The Twilight Zone". The plot makes the viewer immediately recalls George Orwell dystopic society in "1984", Ray Bradbury´s "Fahrenheit 451" and Franz Kafka´s "The Trial". Burgess Meredith has a great performance in the role of the librarian Romney Wordsworth that uses his knowledge and experience to lure and give a lesson to the notorious and arrogant Chancellor. My vote is nine.

Title (Brazil): "O Homem Obsoleto" ("The Obsolete Man")
33 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Rod Serling points out the upmost importance of democracy!!!
elo-equipamentos3 January 2021
The Smoking man Rod Serling mastermind of "The Twilight Zone" using his logical mindset poke the totalitarian systems as Communism and Nazism as well, where the men are pure pawns at hands of the empowered class of blind politicians who ruled by unchanging dogmatic system and over the shadow of the fear, in this weird environment the humble librarian Romney Wordsworth (Burgess Meredith) is taken to Courthouse to be judge as obsolete man, useless to new society, where the books, philosophy and the religion is no longer make sense, all this were banned of this community , baffled Mr. Wordsworth tries by any means explain that his job is upmost importance, due all the books are the prestine knowledge that human race gathered through countless centuries by poets, philosophers, scientists, holly and wise men and all sort of writers giving to the mankind the background knowledge to the upcoming future at sight, however the cold and septic Chancellor (Fritz Weaver) disowns all statements gave by the wise Wordsworth, in 48 hours he must be executed on own choice, the old man claims that his execution must be aired by television broadcasting nationally, how it were routinely offered for the citizens, it is accepts on plenty, nonetheless Mr. Wordsworth planned something more, by far ones the greater episode of the whole series, at final Serling points out that without democracy there's no future to mankind, where every single person has the own right of choice whatsoever!!!

Thanks for reading.

Resume:

First watch: 2020 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 8.5
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rod Serling looks into the future
tranquility-8434927 December 2017
This episode was written by Rod Serling, and in my opinion it ranks as one of the best of the series. The theme of a totalitarian possible future is not merely well produced entertainment, but is a recurring theme in Serling's work that serves as a warning we should not easily dismiss. This nightmare future seems even more relevant today then perhaps when it was written over 50 years ago. Burgess Meredith's performance is outstanding as he carries the single ray of hope in a very dark world.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Contrast to other episodes
jcravens4214 February 2008
An episode with a theme near and dear to Serling's heart: intellectual freedom and the will and power of the "little" guy. It's an obvious tribute to novels like "1984", and while not as well executed as that novel, there is something to be said for the startling visuals presented on such a low budget that bring to life the horrors of a totalitarian regime. My only criticism is the ending -- not to give anything away, but did they run out of money for something better? Regardless, this is an episode that makes you wonder what today's political realities and quasi-religious governments would have inspired Serling to write.
30 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
You cannot erase God with an edict!
mark.waltz24 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Nothing can destroy my faith. No one can take away my knowledge. For Burgess Meredith (in his third "Twilight Zone" episode), it his desire for the pride of his knowledge and faith to keep the Chancellor of a totalitarian government from taking that away from him without his permission. Labeled as obsolete, Meredith is sentenced to die with him being allowed to choose how he is to be executed. The Chancellor (Fritz Weaver in a commanding performance that hides his fear of being exposed) is brought into Meredith's home arrest for a battle of wits with the world watching. Weaver makes mention of previous generations of evil leaders who failed in their attempts at totalanariamism then finds out how Meredith has beaten him at his own game.

Ingenious in every way possible, this is the perfect vengeance against cool, calm and collected leaders who turn into blithering cowards as their lack of justice has turned against them. It is certainly potent nearly 60 years later in an uncertain world where mentions of novels by George Orwell and Ray Bradbury are constantly mentioned. that's certainly was true in the turbulent early 60s as well, and it gets more chilling as we begin to see a clock ticking down the seconds towards destiny facing both men. Meredith never shirks his faith in a world that has denied the existence of God and where only power hungry man is in control. Two powerful actors show their genius, and one thing is clear: as artists, neither are obsolete.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Happening Now
uncatema9 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This episode is a glimpse of what is happening before our very eyes right here, right now.
20 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Brilliant episode.
loves_the_oldies1 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I loved this episode not only because it stars the great Burgess Meredith who is one of my all time favourite stars,but the atmosphere it generates and the little guy standing up to the big guy i e government/ corporates etc. A good performance from Fritz Weaver as usual and the way it all turns sour for him i really enjoyed. It sends a message out at the time of the cold war which is as very relevant today regarding oppression of people as we are beginning to see in most of Europe and especially the UK where the government can ride roughshod over its people and treat disabled people not much better than criminals. A round of applause for the obsolete man.
17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Orwellian State
bkoganbing6 May 2014
One of the better Twilight Zone episodes is this one that is a stinging indictment of the Orwellian State. With a few extra nominal characters this story is an intellectual duel with the Chancellor of a futuristic Orwellian state played by Fritz Weaver and Burgess Meredith an obscure librarian whom for reasons we can only imagine the state has decided is obsolete. That is the profession of librarian is obsolete because free access to the printed word is obsolete when the state controls education.

One of the perks granted to obsolete people who because they are obsolete and serve no useful function to the state they get to choose the manner of their execution as long as it is in a timely manner.

Meredith chooses his method quite well and in the process teaches Weaver a lesson in what it means to be obsolete.

George Orwell would have loved this story.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Yes, It's Wordy, But....
Hitchcoc21 November 2008
This is a top ten pick for me. It's not so much the Orwellian culture it depicts. It's about our humanity; what we are. The shadow of the huge lectern where Fritz Weaver lords it over the accused. His incredibly emotive speech method. It's Burgess Meredith, seemingly cowering at first and then realizing that if his life is to have worth, he needs to make a final statement. While there is a bit of religion thrown in there, I like to think that it is the wish of this man to simply live out the last moment of his life on his own terms. Meredith, as I've said before, is a great actor. His calmness and grace in this role make this otherwise simplistic tale sing. The meek shall inherit the earth I guess.
36 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Irony meter
emguy16 May 2016
I found the episode a little too heavy-handed and preachy. However, I usually like reading IMDb commentary on TZ episodes, because the comments are generally of high quality, and you can find interesting reactions and perspectives.

This time, I think my irony meter broke. I'm astonished at the comments suggesting that we ALREADY live in the world depicted by this episode. The irony of such a comment is apparently lost on those commenters. No government dictated what they could watch. They were free to comment in a public forum without repercussions. Their comments weren't edited or removed by anyone. They can easily read from a vast, massive variety of books that are published without governmental interference. And yet they think we're already living this episode.

I'll have to get a new irony meter. This one is smoking and making sad popping noises.
20 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Subtlety out the window
maximusveritas2 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
To say this was too "preachy" or "obvious" is an understatement. The best Twilight Zone episodes were those where the meaning was not obvious and was instead subtly conveyed via fantastical allegory. Serling was forced to go this route after suffering from censorship early in his career that prevented him from directly addressing current social concerns with criticism that might offend the advertisers. This episode fit the prevailing Cold War mindset of the time and was therefore free from their censors. In the end, it became proof that perhaps the censorship Serling often complained about was actually a good thing. It forced him to "hide" his messages in his fantasy stories and avoid preaching directly to the audience as he does in this episode. The main characters here are ridiculous caricatures of the evil tyrant and the saintly martyr. The whole plot strains the limits of believability time and time again. Serling's ending monologue feels like he's hitting us over the head. Those who strongly agree with its message might be able to overlook or even enjoy these things, but in the end, it is a weaker episode than if it had been more subtly executed.
29 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Watch This Episode
tthomas76025 February 2006
Another of Rod Serling's cautionary tales of the rise of the totalitarian state.

Rodney Wordsworth is declared "obsolete" by a tribunal of the state in the not too distant future. The sentence is. of course, death, but some surprises await the State at the humble hands of Mr. Wordsworth.

Anyone seeing this episode today will be shocked at it's relevance. A society which has "proven" that there is no God; a state which enforces a mind-numbing conformity; a state which refuses to respect or acknowledge the rights of the individual or the sanctity of life.

Watch this episode and reflect long and hard.
75 out of 104 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Where dumbing-down will lead us to if we let it.
darrenpearce1111 December 2013
Probably the most important message to come from the Zone is this one. Romney Wordsworth (Burgess Meredith) is proud to be a librarian in a totalitarian state where such an occupation is banned. He is condemned to death for this as he is deemed obsolete by the Chancellor (Fritz Weaver). The state is an austere place that bans all freedom of thought. However, Wordsworth is a man with a plan, being inspired to make a stand for the literature and freedom of religious thought that he loves.

'The Obsolete Man' has the quality of a nightmare while being natural and true at the same time. The message about the individual is timeless. We all need education, literacy, personal aspirations, and choice to be really human. Serling mentions the tyrants of history leaving their impression on this state. Do not let the dumbing-down, ban-everything, political correctness of today facilitate their evil, lingering influence.
19 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Outstanding episode
Woodyanders7 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Meek librarian Romney Wordsworth (a marvelous and impassioned performance by Burgess Meredith) gets sentenced to death after being deemed obsolete in a bleak totalitarian police state society. However, Wordsworth isn't going to die without engaging in a little war of wits and wills with the strict chancellor (a terrific portrayal by Fritz Weaver) first.

Director Elliot Silverstein ably crafts a brooding oppressive atmosphere and relates the gripping story at a steady pace. Rod Serling's brilliant and incisive script not only offers a powerful and provocative central message about the evils of a fascist culture in which free thought and individuality are suppressed in favor of stifling conformity and censorship, but also makes a profound and poignant humanistic point on how even the most seemingly insignificant person still has some kind of worth and hence isn't obsolete after all. The sharp cinematography by George T. Clemens provides an effectively stark and moody look. One of this show's finest half hours.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
You're cheating your audience...You're not facing the cameras!
daveyd-8724017 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Both Wordsworth and the Chancellor both used this title catch phrase but somehow when Wordsworth delivers it it is quite effective and shows that the tables have now been turned on the Chancellor. This episode is quite relevant today and any state or entity that does not allow a person to worship God is in fact harmful and obsolete.

Burgess Meredith was wonderful here especially in Act 2. He really gave as well as he got from the Chancellor and he truly was in the driver's seat by the end of the episode. True, he did become a martyr for the freedom and liberty of his beliefs but he won a moral victory over the state which stifled him!

Overall I rate this a 9 out of 10.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Yet another excellent episode with Burgess Meredith
UniqueParticle7 May 2019
Super bizarre courtroom creepiness at its finest. Memorable & powerfully condemning! Rod Sterling's classic craftful writing at the end of season 2 is great. As always though, this show is mind blowing!
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Twilight zone? More like our near future!
homeschoolhoward13 February 2022
The 'Osolete Man' is one of my favorite Twilight episodes! Mr. Woodsworth's story is more relevant today as her was back then! Society is on a strange trajectory. I feel like Mr. Woodworth's character is a welcoming representation of how one should behave with honor and dignity. All the words that comes out of his mouth are true and pertinent to this day in age. It's a pretty chilling story considering how fragile society is. The government encroachment of individual rights is nothing new.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"...the State has no use for your kind!"
classicsoncall4 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I've seen this one a couple of times before, but it never hit me with such force as it did today. In an earlier era, it was easy enough to believe that 'this could never happen here'. But you look around and see what's happening today within this very country, and one realistically fears for the future of the nation. Yet on the flip side, those old enough to have been around when this story first aired will recall those air raid drills of the late Fifties and early Sixties as the threat of Communism threatened our very shores during the Cuban missile crisis. With courage and leadership, we can defeat the radicalization of America and come out stronger on the other side, but it will take some effort.

Rod Serling appeared to have a special devotion to this theme of defending personal freedom and liberty, inveighing against ideologues who fought logic as an enemy, and truth as a menace. Episode #2.6 - Eye of the Beholder also explored a similar theme of conformity to the State, and utilized the same soaring vantage point for the Supreme Leader, whether it was a pig faced dictator or a reigning Chancellor. Rodney Wordsworth (Burgess Meredith) exemplifies the most horrendous enemy of the State - he believes in God, he's a librarian who personally owns books that have been outlawed, and most chillingly, he thinks for himself.

That's why Wordsworth's self imposed death sentence is particularly brilliant. He takes it to the bully, and reveals just how cowardly all real bullies are. Under the veneer of government authority and propped up by a corrupt system, the statist is exposed as a fraud, and in turn is sentenced to oblivion for being obsolete himself. Perhaps the most chilling indictment of statism was expressed by the Chancellor (Fritz Weaver) when he declared Hitler and Stalin had it right, but they hadn't gone far enough. Very bold for Serling to venture this far in his observation of Marxism, Socialism and Fascism.

This might seem like I'm coming out of left field, but an interesting companion piece to view along side this episode would be the 1987 film "The Running Man" with Arnold Schwarzenneger. In that movie set in the future, the world economy was in a state of collapse, dissent wasn't tolerated, and television was controlled by the State. Not only that, but the entire entertainment industry, relegated to game shows to keep the masses distracted from high unemployment, was under the jurisdiction of the Justice Department! Both stories manage to caricature a government in control that's quite literally out of control. If it wasn't all so disturbingly familiar, one would be tempted to laugh instead of cringe in discomfort. The time is right for some obsolete men to be back in charge.
20 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Burgess Meredith-THE actor of TZ
thatsweetbird31 December 2018
Who is the star of TZ considering it's an anthology series ? Well of course it's the host, Rod Serling. But beyond that I nominate Meridith. I also thought of William Shatner who starred in two very good episodes. But Meridith starred in four episodes that although not all perfect are all fairly memorable. Yes, "Mr. Tingle" is pretty silly. But "Time At Last" is perhaps THE greatest TZ episode . And both the entertaining "Printer's Devil" And this episode- The powerful anti-totalitarianism "Obsolete Man" are quite strong.

I wanted to say that being an atheist myself I feel the pro-God's existence aspect Of this episode likely lost it a point or two for me. I think the important point that should be made by such a story is That the state should not be able to tell citizens that God does or does not exist- Indeed a state that insists that a religion is true is every bit as bad as one that insists it is not.

Other than that this episode is strong in a George Orwell way in taking on the evil of the modern Nation state.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Man of Worth
hellraiser710 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This is an episode I really like it's not quite on my personal top ten for the show it's an honorable mention on my book. It's kinda similar to the sci-fi book "The Continuous Katherine Mortonhoe" which was also a dytopian tale about a woman being watched on her last moments of life. In a way this tale is kinda a bottle episode since most of the tale takes place in one room, but it works because it is driven by well written dialog and characterization of it's main protagonist.

It's pretty much a short Dytopian tale, it's a glimpse into a protofacist society that we see has flushed law and morality down the toilet but worst of all has made itself intellectually and spiritually bankrupt. Despite only a small amount of detail about this society it still feels frighteningly plausible; a world without any books would be a living hell for me.

Burgess Meradeith one of my favorite actors is just great in this. The last name of his character is ironic to the theme of the tale. You really feel a sense of pathos for his character because he's an innocent man and his only crime was simply being human.

Fritz Wever also is good at playing The Chancelor a unlike able villain whom is just a fascist fanatic overly eager to stamp his foot on anything different and anything a threat to the soulless entity he serves and worships The State.

I really like Wordsworth's room it almost looks a little like my own if you can actually believe that as it is just filled to the brim with books ever where, in a way this shows how much wisdom he possesses and spiritually strong Wordsworth is because throughout his life he has pursued knowledge, enriching his mind as much as possible; as an old saying goes "Knowledge is power". But most importantly shows his life was truly meaningful which shows how much worth he truly has.

Wordworth we see is scared of the ordeal he has to go though which is understandable, knowing you going to die in a matter of minutes isn't a pleasant thought. But what I like about him is he has a strong sense of self worth hence his name. He decides that if he's going to go down he'll go down with dignity and honor, when we see him trick the Chancler into a spiritual confrontation.

The Chancellor we see is the one that truly has no worth. As we see him just bragging constantly throwing verbal stones at Wordsworth about the justification in amoral actions as well as the power of the state just to bring Wordsworth down. But we see Wordsworth doesn't bent from the verbal abuse and bull crap this guy spouts out which is exactly what the chancellor is full of. We can clearly see that the Chancellor isn't really his own person but just a mere product of his time. He has no life except in the business of murder. Which is what makes his soul empty.

I really loved it when Wordsworth turned things around which made me smile, the Chancellor had the advantage in the courtroom but he's on Wordsworth's turf now which mean it's his rules. And of course we see the spiritual confortation as Wordsworth reads passages from the bible and the Chancellor has nothing to do but listen and we see slowly those passages from the bible affect him. This of course invalidates the Chancellor's argument about words being worthless because words contain meanings and when read they affect the reader or listeners thinking and feeling; so once again Wordworth is true to his name.

In a way this tale is also kinda a Christian tale. I really like how we see religion play a part in this. What Wordsworth goes though in a way is Christ allegory, even like a little moment when he mentioned he constructed most of his furniture himself which is a bit ironic since Christ was also a carpenter. However it's also just a simple story with a good message about the importance and power of literacy but also about a man departing on his own terms and how it truly is a private thing.

And we see in the end that The Chanslaur is the one that is weak. He has power but he has no spiritual strength, because power and strength are never one and the same. The very godless entity he worshiped has turned against him, power is fleeting and loves no one back.

No man is obsolete because their worth something.

Rating: 4 stars
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a warning
petersjoelen30 August 2022
This episode is somehow a warning for the near future , we are moving more and more into some sort of totalitarion system where woke culture feminism and identity politics are the new gods .

The actors in this episode did a good job in portraying a mindless bee hive minded state of mind as the state and the absence of individual thinking .

The intimidation technique reminded me of the scenes i saw from footage from the tribunals in nazi germany where Freisler was a judge and also a terrifying character .

In this episode the trial was not so extreme and i don't know if that was the right choice .
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Preachy, preachy, preachy!!!
planktonrules29 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
A librarian living in a totalitarian state is deemed to be obsolete and expendable--since books and independent thinking are banned. So the self-righteous judge sentences him to death. However, and this made no sense to me, the manner of death was just plain silly and overly melodramatic--like the judge was playing with the librarian much like a cat might play with a doomed mouse. In the end, the tables (naturally) are turned.

This seemed like one of the more preachy episodes of The Twilight Zone and is an obvious parable about not just Fascism but the horrors of Communism. Now I am NOT a fan of Communism--but the show is just so obvious and preachy that in the end I could see this show converting the audience to Communism! It just gives Democracies a bad name since it is so incredibly preachy and obvious.
26 out of 116 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed