"Oz" Exeunt Omnes (TV Episode 2003) Poster

(TV Series)

(2003)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Like saying ‚goodbye' to a good friend who outstayed his welcome for a little too long
t_atzmueller24 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The avid fan had visited the facilities of Oswald penitentiary for more than 50 episodes. We spent our times with murderous psychopaths, drug-peddlers, white supremacists, Mafiosi and generally the scum of the earth, gleefully watching them scheming and wreck havoc among each other.

Well, all good things must come to an end.

"Oz", despite the excellent actors and often captivating story lines had, at the latest after the third season, begun to feed off its own carcass. Themes would often repeat themselves, plots took the most absurd turns and twists and one could almost smell the writers anxiety to churn out coherent stories. After all, there are only so many ways in which to depict prison murder and male-rape. In other words: the producers had tried to beat a dead horse into motion.

When the final episode was announced, it must have been clear to everybody that final would mean final. In a way it was sad to say goodbye to those characters we had come to know and even like, despite their despicable deeds and personalities, but at the same time we felt relief.

We must give credits to the writers for wrapping it all up for us and yet ending the show with a cliffhanger, leaving enough main-characters alive for a potential, though unlikely sequel. The finale gives us, what we had rooted for a long time: the end of odious Vern Schillinger and psychopathic Chris Keller; the execution of Cyril is touching but sweetened by seeing loathsome director Querns vomit and the saga of Ryan and Dr. Nathan comes to full circles (albeit as improbable as the storyline has been in the first place). Despite being relatively new, the character Torquemada is similarly colorful and intriguing as the satanic Rastafarian Supreme Allah in Season four but his hinted-at affair with Miguel Alvarez would (probably) have been nothing but a warmed-up rendition of the Beecher-Keller-storyline.

It was good while it lasted, despite lasting a little longer than it should have in the first place, but the conclusion compensated a lot for the shortcomings of the last two seasons.
27 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best shows in TV history
kurt78252 July 2021
The final season was excellent. All seasons were great. I've seen the show 4 times now. I'll probably watch it again next year.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Season 6: A mostly empty box-ticking exercise but maybe there is enough investment from viewers to carry them through it? (MASSIVE SPOILERS)
bob the moo7 August 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I came into season 6 with the vague memory of it being pretty poor compared to the rest of the seasons – a memory I had from watching the whole show over years while it screened on TV. This time around I came into it with the fresh memory of having watched all the episodes over the last year or so, and knowing that it was not always as strong a show as I remember. The upside of this is that the final season is not as bad as I remember – mainly because I remembered the dumbest parts and forgot the rest.

It is still a weaker season though and it certainly is not satisfying as a season, never mind an overall conclusion. There is plenty going on in the season though but it isn't very cohesive. I always found the show to be at its best when it could sustain tensions and have a consistent line of conflict between the characters and that never really happens here. We have old characters come in to help with the narration (which I liked as a device) but we also have old characters showing up in the prison itself. New prisoners come in and generally don't make much impact whether they are fodder for a kill or stay for several episodes. Most annoyingly, major characters are removed at a very fast rate and it is done in a way that doesn't have any meaning. This lack of meaning is annoying considering most of these characters had been so strong over the previous seasons but they are removed like nothing – a manner I could accept if that was the point, but it isn't – it just feels like clearing house in a very uninterested way. The lack of emotional impact is quite numbing. Glynn, Schillinger, Said, Cyril, Keller, Hoyt, Morales, Omar and so on – they all deserved better as characters. The lack of plot reasons or context is also bad – their removals mostly just sort of happen and that's it, but to be honest it is the lack of punch to the viewer that is hardest to accept.

The plots in and around the episodes are all very so-so as well. The tensions between the groups is not well done and mostly the plots seem to hing around devices that don't work. Possession by the Devil, execution of the mentally ill, something about light in the universe and that bloody maze thing which is used as a crutch to show "soul- searching" in place of the writers actually doing stuff with the characters. The season has moments and I guess those viewers that are 6 seasons in will at least enjoy it for ticking the usual Oz boxes of brutality and violence, but it really does feel at times like box- ticking is all we're doing.

Season 6 isn't awful, but it really is the show running on auto-pilot and just filling time with nothing plots and generally killing major characters off in a way that doesn't engage or satisfy. The final "exit all" moment is typical of the season as it makes no sense, seems silly on reflection and generally didn't provide a satisfying full stop. My investment in the place and characters kept me interested and I didn't hate it, but even I have to admit how flawed this final season is. A real shame it went out like this when it should have focused on its core strengths and dropped all the nonsense.
14 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
As we bid farewell, I couldn't help but wonder...(HEAVY SPOILERS)
shawnw00725 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Yes, Oz will survive as one of the greatest shows in history. I binged-watched this drama in a two-week sitting, and savored every waking moment. However, now that I've reached the conclusion of the series, I couldn't help but ponder...

Random Musings -

1. Leo Glynn's/Harrison Beecher/Mayor Loewen's deaths - So, these are three very prominent members of the community who were brutally murdered within weeks apart. Not to mention, the murders were sloppy, hastily done by cons and undoubtedly left a string of clues in every which way. Yes, we know their killers were ultimately slain in retribution. But why are the men's deaths never mentioned again? Why are conditions at Oz even allowed to continue as if these men never existed? I mean, the actual MAYOR of the city's throat was cut while in custody. And we're all just moving on?

On that note, why is Governor Devlin still roaming free? With the string of evidence/confessions surrounding him, including McManus's little "No matter what...we will get you!" proclamation, why was Devlin never implicated in the murder of Mayor Loewen? My 9-year-old could have linked him to the crime.

2. Cameras - I read somewhere that in it's 6-season run, Oz incurred a total of 112 deaths (with only 14 being natural or accidental). By the end of the series, it was open season as major characters were being killed left and right. So with the ever-present principle that "We can't incriminate anyone unless there is proof...otherwise it's his word against yours..." then why didn't administration simply invest in a basic security system? With all of Glynn's table talks with his staff, not individual ever suggested installing cameras? Decent security existed in the 2000's. Even a cheap security system would have been advantageous and well-spent within Warden Glynn's thin budget.

3. Speaking of which, I never understood why Oz consistently maintained the "it's his word against yours" policy. Not only was this inconceivable, as there are millions of other provable ways one can link someone to a crime minus witnesses, but this decree seemed to function as a hall pass for many of the killings in the show (ie. O'Reily's murdering Patrick Keenan while Arif clearly watched). After all, it seems that if anyone wants to kill in Oz, they're welcome to kill freely in broad daylight. If someone sees you, no biggie: it'll merely be your word against theirs.

4. Why exactly did Idzik kill Kareem Said? Yes, we were adorned with loads of Idzik's theories about the universe. We learned of his flighty resentment of Kareem's "coffee talk" premonition about the end of the world. But was this really enough to enter a prison years later and off the man? I just wasn't buying it. Including the frivolous way that Idzik slipped the gun into one of the nation's most deadliest prisons in the first place.

And then, in sheer idiocy, McManus decides to bunk Idzik with Omar White, of all people? The same White, who was Kareem Said's protégé and someone with a repeated history of mental instability and impulsivity? Oh come on...

5. Cyril O'Reily - Why was this man even executed? He was granted a stay of execution only to be executed again right afterward? What was the point of the brief hiatus in-between? Talk about an anti-climax. Furthermore, prisoners in Oz are killed left and right, and some in plain sight. Vern Schillinger, for one, had Tobias Beecher's child murdered and his ear sent FedEx, and yet Cyril becomes the only scapegoat for the death penalty while trying to defend his brother in front of 100 witnesses? Obviously, the murder wasn't premeditated. So why wasn't Cyril's crime reduced to additional years on his sentence? Again, not buying it.

6. Missing persons - Did anyone ever pursue the disappearances of Cloutier and Ronald Barlog? Cloutier was sealed into a wall TWICE, and no one thought to look for this man, who was completely bed-bound, ever again? And did anyone find it odd that Barlog never returned to his pod after having his neck broken in the storage room? Or are these all off-camera discoveries?

7. Poet - In the vein of miraculous recoveries, it's amazing how Poet (and Junior Pierce) could have scalding hot soup poured on him in Season 4, develop near-fatal third-degree burns, and somehow survive without one IOTA of a scar afterward. Aloe vera clearly works wonders.

8. Enrique Morales' death - This was also a wild one. Tough man Morales whimpers a heartfelt confession to Warden Glynn that nurse Grace "scares me" instead of ordering one of his thugs to off her. Meanwhile, nurse Grace, who has a public history of suspected killings at her old job, is assigned the EXACT SAME JOB with proximity to ailing prisoners. Yeah, right. And all at once, she decides to start offing one prisoner after the next, causing the convenient deaths of both Morales and Carlos Martinez. But what exactly prompted her latest slew of killings? Didn't Dr. Nathan share that nurse Grace had worked at Oz prior to her arrival? Did nurse Grace finally decide it was time to start killing all the "bad men who deserved to be punished" again out of the blue?

9. Dave Brass - Why exactly did Dave Brass attempt to kill Vahue? The writers didn't give enough justification to warrant his actions except for a brief conversation between he and Vahue that served as a cheap precursor. Perhaps the strain of Brass's busted Achilles' tendons was too much for him emotionally...yet there was never any bad blood between he and Vahue to begin with. Brass not only inherited a whopping 2 mil from Rebadow's ticket, but he also slashed Morales' ankles with delicious moment of poetic justice. What was more needed at this point?

All in all, I suppose no show is perfect. There will always be inconsistencies and implausible notions at every turn (a pool table in a max security prison alone takes the cake). Otherwise, Oz will remain in my top ten permanently.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Where have all the characters disappeared too??
samjburdens8 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Have to admit I loved watching OZ from start to finish but I'm bemused and confused as to where the main characters ended up. What happened to Beecher,Alvarez, McManus! It ended the show a bit dissatisfied as I've enjoyed it from the start!
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Weak finale but no surprises
interestingstuff4 March 2023
It was kind of obvious that finale of this show was going to be weak and disappointing no matter what they did with the storyline because they killed off all the interesting characters people cared about already so there weren't anyone left that people could care about one way or another. The remaining characters were mostly side characters that most people couldn't care less about no matter what happened to them so most people weren't that invested in this. To make the matters worse, they chose to make this a double-episode that was almost as long as a movie and filled it mostly with filler dialogue that led to nowhere.

This show overstayed its welcome by about 2 seasons but it was decent nevertheless. I'd give the overall show 8/10 and final season 6/10 but I wouldn't call this one of the best shows ever like many people seem to call it.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed