Sweet Dreams Intermingled with Nightmares (1909) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Stop-Motion Magic
boblipton4 July 2019
A woman dressed in the costume of the ancien-regime dozes on a garden bench, where she dreams of nightmarish dwarfs, then beautiful court figure.

Segundo de Chomon was a Spanish cameraman who, since about 1903, had turned producer for Pathe, making the sort of stop-motion magic pictures that are better recalled as from Melies' studio. Although Melies films most of his works in his own studio in Montreuil. Although Melies shot most of his movies in the studio, where he had a well-thought-out system for the varied shots and camera movements, de Chomon was not averse to going outdoors. To a large extent, their backgrounds determined their differences. Melies was a stage magician turned film makerwho needed absolute control over his mechanisms to obtain the effects he wanted, while de Chomon was a documentary cameraman turned movie magician, used to shooting on site.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Doing Georges Méliès one better
planktonrules12 February 2014
During much of his career, the Spanish director Segundo de Chomón copied much of the work of the famed French director Georges Méliès. Some of Chomón films seemed mostly inspired by Méliès--using some of the same techniques he pioneered. Some were downright knockoffs intended to fool the public. However, one thing you cannot deny is that Segundo de Chomón was quite talented.

In "Sweet Dreams Intermingled with Nightmares", Chomón has shown that he can use many of his competitor's techniques BUT infuse a few of his own and come up with a better product. Considering it came out in 1909--over a decade after Méliès began making films--it's not surprising it's a bit of an improvement. Unlike the old master, Chomón has set much of his film outdoors, has a complex (though confusing) plot and has amazingly nice sets for the day. He uses stop-motion but also double-exposures to come up with some neat camera tricks.

As far as the plot goes, it's confusing. It is set around 1760 (give or take a week) and begins with a lady falling asleep outside next to a pond. During her sleep, some weird creature (I think it's el Diablo--the great fighting chicken) takes her to a weird world with STRANGE guys. These weird guys have amazingly cool costumes and masks--and they are impossible to really describe. This dream sucked and when she woke up, the lady was NOT happy. Then, a pretty fairy (or something magical) appears and gives her a much nicer dream where she falls in love with her Prince Charming. What's next? See it and find out for yourself.

Because the film is complex, lovely to look at and is fun, I strongly recommend it. Just don't be surprised if you find it a tad confusing. I say don't worry about this--just let go and enjoy this fantasy film.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Elaborating Dreams
Tornado_Sam17 June 2019
Considering that just a year before in 1908 Segundo de Chomón had been innovating with his closeup work and using stop-motion animation to create new effects, "Sweet Dreams Intermingled with Nightmares" is not an especially innovative work with its stagy long shots and elaborate stage sets. Knowing Chomón, you would expect a film of this date to be a little more innovative with effects work, and expect a less stagy atmosphere when compared to earlier works. Yet, even despite the staginess of the short, it is definitely an improvement when you consider the obvious effort that was put into the nice visual look.

"Sweet Dreams Intermingled with Nightmares" takes a very common and well-practiced concept utilized all the way back in the 1890s: dreams. The first "dream" films, that is, films in which the main character experiences a dream disrupting their sleep, were first made by (quite predictably) Georges Méliès. Méliès was the competitor of Chomón and the innovator of many of the film effects we use today: stop-motion, superimpositions, dissolves, etc. Because Chomón started filmmaking at a much later date, he learned of Méliès's wonderful movies--among the best of the period--and, while moving with the advancements of filmmaking, took them and remade them in much better ways. (Méliès, unfortunately, was not like his competition and continued to do the same things he had began with all the way back in 1896, without changing with the times). "Dream" films, being one thing his competition had already done, were among the concepts Chomón improved upon--and in this 1909 film, he does a more visually elaborate--though not structurally elaborate--job in making a better work.

The short takes place by a pond outdoors. As the other reviewer has already pointed out, Méliès did not hardly ever shoot outdoors, so that is already an innovation of sorts--though not really uncommon when you look at what other filmmakers were doing. A woman, played by Julienne Mathieu the director's wife, falls asleep on a park bench and has two dreams. In the first, she is transported to a dark cavern where strange goblins with oversized heads--which are impressively crafted head-pieces--roast her over a fire. Waking up, she is unhappy and then sleeps and dreams once more, this time entering a beautiful place, where she meets a handsome prince. There is a small laugh at the end to conclude the story.

As the other reviewer pointed out, the sets in this film are a definite improvement over Méliès's, which were usually cheaper due to his films being on a smaller budget. Pathé Frères, the company for which Chomón worked, could afford much fancier sets and costumes to create a much more elaborate visual look. (For example, Méliès could never have afforded those huge head-pieces). The superimposition effects are also an improvement over the competition--if Méliès had been doing them, they would have been sloppier and shook around a lot more on the screen. As I pointed out, for a 1909 film Chomón still does stick to stagy long shots with no closeups which he had worked with before--but this can be overlooked since there wasn't any particular need for them anyhow. All in all, longer, more visually impressive, and just more complex in general (especially for a dream film). A definite elaboration on Méliès and much thus nicer to watch.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed