Sum of Existence (2005) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
had potential
cobain-725 June 2006
I saw this movie. It was OK.

there were some incredibly strong performances from the actors, particularly from the girls who played Liz and Michelle. i found some of the other leads to be a bit over the top, some were a bit wooden, but overall the acting was one of the stronger points. the concept was interesting but wandered a little at times, at other times skimming over things which seemed like they deserved more attention.

it was difficult to really empathize with either of the female protagonists (the teenage girl or the psychiatrist)- mostly because their characters seemed to almost be fighting over which one was the focus of the main story. because of this they both came off a bit cold, something which may have been solved by their relationship with each other but wasn't. in their scenes together Juliet (the shrink) came off as patronizing and superficial, and the girl as a result just came off like a whiny brat (which considering she's recovering from a savage attack seems pretty damn harsh). there were other characters and sub-plots which could have brought a more human element to both these characters: Juliet had an ex-boyfriend character who was a rape counselor, any and all warmth about her character came from their relationship. unfortunately for her he was only in a couple of scenes (which also seemed strange considering his character was pretty much imperative to the whole story). he was one of the film's only completely sympathetic characters, had the potential to link Liz's family and Juliet on a more personal level but didn't. instead there was scene after scene of the parents fighting with each other which just distracted from the main story and made their characters seem cold and selfish. Liz had a best friend Michelle who spent most of the film going through an emotional crisis/ethical dilemma. the actress in this role delivered a notably convincing performance but the character just sort of added to the heaviness of the plot. there was a definite opportunity to balance this (which i can only assume was cut from the film for god knows what reason): they had a third friend who was a goth (the only teenage girl that didn't have blonde hair?) who for some reason was only there for the beginning and the end of the film. she was clearly supposed to be best friends with Liz and Michelle, it was set up that these 3 were being constantly verbally (albeit lamely) abused by the "popular girls" but that their strong friendship bond prevented the bitchiness from affecting them. why was she not around while Liz spent most of the film in a violent mental/emotional struggle and Michelle spent most of the film in tears? some of the other characters just blended in as part of the backdrop, such as the crazies in the psych ward, the bitchy girls, the nurses etc, probably their scenes could have been minimized as much of their interaction was unnecessary.

there were a couple of plot holes which was frustrating, it did seem as though there was little communication between the director/writer and the editor and some of the shots were weird and slightly inappropriate (stuff like characters cut off the edge of a shot for an entire scene... if they're there why can i only see their arm?). it ran too long (which i think is pretty standard fare for a writer/director debut)- some scenes dragged, some probably should have been cut. the music was really repetitive and often completely inappropriate. the dark mood probably would have been more balanced with a greater diversity of music- the only music was the score (apparently they lived in a suburb with no radio stations?) which was all based around a sombre piano that came in suddenly and forebodingly no matter what the scene.

there were some great elements in the film, there were also many things overlooked. brings up some interesting points but doesn't follow all of them through. the acting is good, if you can get past the urge to punch the characters for all being total downers. not a movie to cheer you up if you're feeling blue. might have made a great TV show.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Remember to forget this!
powerage696 August 2004
Warning: Spoilers
I appreciate privately made films, I do it myself, but sometimes you wonder even what the cameramen were thinking when they were filming!

Before I go into the bad details, the writer is due some credit. Sure, it is an intriguing idea, kidnapping and rape does create a good drama, but they have to be handled correctly. I think J.D. Cohen did have the right intentions for the type of film he was trying to craft, but as I sat there in its first screening, I found myself laughing (along with most of the audience present) at all the wrong times.

The climax was ridiculous, the plot was mostly spelt out for the audience making you feel like an idiot, and the execution of the script was just plain...crap. How's this for an example, as Alex (the attacker) corners Liz (the victim), near the end of the film, in a security car park, Liz's friend Michelle stands outside the car park screaming to get in to help her friend - it's at this point a writer must find some way for his Michelle character to gain entry thus enabling her to save her friend - and what direction did he take? A couple making out open the carparks door for her... They don't help her plight at all, if someone was being attacked I'm sure that people wouldn't just turn a blind eye like this, and then all of a sudden the couple are gone in later minutes... What the ****?

Frankly, I want that 2 hours back. Did it really need to be 2 hours long? No. The hospital scenes were way too long and drawn out, almost physically painful to sit through, and what was with that Hannah character? You can always tell when a writer has also taken the liberty of directing because scenes are just so damn long, in the end you're sacrificing pace for details, and thats where you lose me and the rest of the audience.

Now I don't usually write reviews on IMDb, but this movie was just shite! And for a drama/thriller, I was laughing way too hard at other aspects of the film as I walked out... Is that a good thing? No. It is not.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
...Really?!
missbronze1811 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
***Contains Spoilers***

I never review anything online because, let's face it, everyone reviews everything. However, this movie was THAT bad that I actually felt the need to join this site just to have my say about it shortly after having watched it.

Look, the concept is great: rape victim doesn't recover mentally from trauma so she's hypnotised (without her consent) by the well meaning family psychiatrist. Her attacker doesn't like this as he doesn't want his victim forgetting him and continues to stalk her, the victim starts remembering this and that and then eventually, everyone who's been lying to her has to tell her what really happened yada yada yada. Meanwhile her parents marriage is falling apart. Yep, awesome concept, great ideas.

Honestly though? Just not enough money. That's where this film falls down. There obviously just wasn't enough cash to make this movie right, I just really hope that one day it's made properly. None of the scenes in this film were disturbing, moving, frightening - there was just no way to relate to any of the characters I'm afraid.

If this film was done right (bigger budget, better director, better actors) then honestly, it'd be huge. Like I said, the idea/concept is great. The movie is not.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another Point of View
wynter_auditions2 September 2004
I would like to add some balance to th previous "review" in whom was a little on the harsh side.

SUM OF EXISTENCE was shot on digital beta (I bothered to ask what it was shot on) so having some limited knowledge of the film making process and how something that was shot as a "telemovie" would translate onto the big screen, I understood the look the film had when it was translated to the "big screen".

JD COHEN (writer, director and producer) has produced a worth while film for his maiden voyage into the film industry. While it was shot on an almost "shoe string budget", he and his team did a fine job for their first feature film. I certainly believe it was better than most directorial debuts I have seen over the years.

As for the person picking the "plot holes" in the script, well hey, welcome to the world of film making. I would certainly like to see some films of his or hers that DO NOT have plot holes (when thinking of plot holes, let us not forget a certain big budget sci-fi in which the world was saved when we uploaded a computer virus in an ALIEN computer .... and we think that windows and mac have compatibility problems ... HA!).

SUM OF EXISTENCE was well acted and well directed in my humble opinion (especially when the very small if not non-existent budget is taken into account!). This opinion I "qualify" as an indie film maker myself.

Above all things, the most important aspect to consider is that JD COHEN and the team have GOT OUT THERE AND DONE THE THING !!! Many plan to shoot something, won't try for funding and winge and moan about the state of our film industry in this country (which admittedly isn't all that good!!!), then they will have a dig at someone and their team that HAS GONE OUT THERE and MADE THE FILM.

Kudos to JD COHEN, TIM MADDOCKS and the rest of the team.

Kudos to SUM OF EXISTENCE.

Lets see more people willing to take a chance and get out there.

PS. I have been in contact with both JD and Tim since the screening, both are in planning and negotiations for their next respective films ... with substantial budgets .... so there's another reason for us all to get off our butts and make our films ... after all you never know where that project will take you
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Save yourself!
howlingwolf6930 December 2006
Seriously. 13 votes and this thing has a rating of 7.5? That's what happens when the director and producers are allowed to vote on their own product. Although in a forum like this I guess that's impossible to police. I won't dignify this piece of trash with any more time - I just needed to provide a Public Service Announcement. DON'T SEE THIS FILM!!! PLEASE!! Even if mere grade school amateurs has made this film, you'd still be hard pressed to smile and lie to them about their chances of making it to Hollywood. .............oh dear lord - IMDb requires a minimum ten lines of text. I'll just blather on for a bit now so I can meet their quota. Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah. There. And I guarantee you that this review was less painful than the film it's about.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Truly awful
Viewer3730 December 2006
"Sum of existence" is amateurish: amateurish acting, scripting and direction. I came across this film on TV one night and assumed it to be either an acting school's end of year film, or someone's private project. I watched it in disbelief that a, it had been made and b, it was being shown on free-to-air television. When I discovered it was backed with government money and all involved were allegedly professional, I was shocked. It is a poor attempt at a thriller, with clichéd situations. I can find nothing to recommend in this film. It is an embarrassment to the Australian film industry. The industry here is notoriously underfunded and it makes me angry that money should have been spent on this schlock. All those who were involved in funding and making it should have a good long hard look at themselves.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A fantastic film.
jessicascats11 January 2007
Director/Writer Jon Cohen really tried to produce a good film, and did so with flying colours. Elizabeth Murphy(portrayed by Australian actress-Brooke Anderson) is very believable, she is just like every 16/17 year old, with a twist. Brooke "Mikey" Anderson brings Liz to life, you can really believe what is going on. While I was watching this movie, I could hear myself thinking what you would think if you were there. Its amazing what a bit of effort and determination will do when it comes to making a movie. Congratulations must go out to Jon Cohen, Tim Maddocks, Brooke Anderson and the rest of the crew involved. Lets hope the team does another Australian film soon!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The perils of hypnosis
Ardath_Rekha20 April 2005
Sum of Existence is an extraordinary film that breaks with one of the most cliché'd traditions of psychological thrillers -- the idea that hypnosis is a panacea that can be used to solve problems. In fact, the story centers around the way that the use of hypnosis takes a girl who has already been brutally wounded and unbalances her in ways that almost get her -- and others -- killed.

Liz Murphy is a normal, vivacious teen, who was brutally assaulted by a stranger and left to die. Months after the attack, she lives in a strange sea of denial and confusion. Attempting to go about her normal life, she doesn't understand why so many people treat her differently, even her best friend and her parents, nor why she's periodically haunted by strange, frightening flashes of... something...

What Liz doesn't know is that, in the aftermath of her attack, she broke down so completely that, as a last resort, her parents turned to a psychiatrist who used hypnosis to block her memories. In the short term, it helped her to recover. But it's left her behaving in ways that her friends and family find disturbingly out of character, and THEY are still dealing with the fallout of what happened to her, even if she no longer is. Worst of all, her assailant is furious that she's forgotten him, and is determined to make her remember.

Although a lot of the conventions of the traditional thriller are in place, including the cat-and-mouse game that soon develops between Liz and her stalker, what truly distinguishes this film is the way it delves into the minds of its characters. It explores Liz's fragile state, and the way simply burying a trauma such as hers only worsens its impact. It explores the mind of her psychiatrist, a woman who becomes far too attached to her patients and can't always discern (because she's lost her objectivity) what is truly best for them. And it explores the mind of the twisted psychopath who has become obsessed with Liz's destruction.

Brooke Anderson is a luminous actress, definitely one to watch. She makes Liz's plight very real, and yet manages, even when Liz is at her worst, to imbue the character with a quiet strength that comes to the fore. Liz is nobody's victim, and her mind is nobody's playground, and watching her take back her life and her sanity is a very triumphant experience.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sum of it's parts
coolchick2322 April 2005
they say that the sum of a films parts shouldn't equal more than it's whole. This is true with Sum of Existence. It has amazingly strong acting, strong story line, strong characters, strong direction, strong photography, but something about it doesn't quite fit.

It could be the edit. The film is an intriguing journey through a post-rape mind that has been hypnotized to forget. The protagonist Liz, is played by a talented young actress, and gives us an interesting character to follow during the film. The concept is brilliant. Cohen, (the writer/director) has done his job in creating a believable and realistic yet somehow surreal world in which to tell his story.

An odd one to call. This film has so many strengths in so many areas, but as a whole, something about it just doesn't gel with me. Odd. I did enjoy watching it though, so give it an 8/10.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Award winning
kathryn197425 March 2004
Although I only saw the rough cut, I sat glued to the screen through all 120 minutes and felt that I was witnessing the story first hand. The movie drew you in and evoked the correct emotions at the right time. If this does not get any award nominations, I will be greatly surprised.

I was impressed by the acting performed from both the seasoned actors and the relative new-comers to the screen. I am looking forward to seeing more of this writer / director's works in the future. It was one of the best movies I have seen for years.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Sum of brilliance!
karastra1 January 2007
"Sum of Existence" by first time director Jon Cohen is a great example of Australian independent film that is not afraid to present controversial ideas and concepts that are larger than life on such a shoe string budget.

The film presents the story of Liz, who after a traumatic and brutal experience is hypnotized in order to forget. In short it does help her recover from her complete psychotic break, but in the long run the treatment begins to affect her behavior towards those around her. The film therefore presents a realistic commentary on psychiatry and is a successful attempt of how most psychiatric treatments are short term behavior modifiers, but do not always work long term.

By placing this commentary in amongst a "serial kidnapper/rapist" storyline the film is heightened in its dramatic premise and keeps you entertained and intrigued.

The acting by the entire cast is strong and the vision functionally reflect this and the story nicely.

I have great respect for Jon and his team who were able to take a complex story and actually go out there and make it happen on such a low-budget and then to top it off they were able to score a nice time-slot on Channel 9 through sheer perseverance.

Patience and perseverance is exactly what this film is all about and if this is the first feature film by Jon Cohen then I look forward to experiencing future films of his... Give this guy a budget and see what happens...!!!!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed