User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
A sad little movie, even for a porn flick.
darkmoonfirelyte1 August 2005
It's hard to rate a porn flick properly. You don't go to see it expecting good cinema. Hell, most times you watch it at all, it's as a joke... well, I guess there's other, baser reasons too, but for the sake of argument, porn generally sucks to watch.

This movie is so far beyond that level of suck, it makes sucky movies look... less sucky? Better? Yes, this movie is just that bad. Decent production values (for a porn) cannot make a horrible script, bad sex, and atrocious acting seem any better. It's a pain to watch (at normal speed or fast-forwarded). There really isn't much point in watching it all except to see naked girls. They are decent... so it has one minor thing going for it.

Just, avoid. Avoid at all costs.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
# 61 : Vamp Pire
lamegabyte26 November 2017
the vampire is the most sexual supernatural figure so with a babe like Nikita, I expected a amazing scene! Well as often, imagination beats production: her scene has some nice moments (especially when she seduces and let her be licked) but after it's a disaster: all happens in the dark, the positions are a classic doggy so that's really a bloody disappointment!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Crazy, self-destructive sequel beggars belief
lor_3 March 2016
James Avalon is positioned in porn similarly to Otto Preminger in mainstream cinema - a terrific craftsman with several classics in his quiver (Otto's was certainly "Laura") but a tendency to go overboard at times (Otto's worst excess would be "Skidoo"). After the excellent "Les Vampyres", Avalon returned to the material and hoked it up miserably with this sequel.

Its shooting schedule, listed as from March 1999 to September 2001 betrays an uncertainty which way to go with the project. Final result is often risible, though Avalon pretends to keep a straight face in limning the erotic activities of vampires.

Opening in 1663, the backdrop is set with fine sexual performances by vamp Syren and her adversary Misty Rain. But in the present-day story all logic breaks falls apart as Avalon chooses to morph cast members into new personalities, with new actresses taking over. It's silliness in the extreme, as Misty suddenly becomes Nikita Denise, a force-of-nature actress I always like to watch, but ludicrous here.

If that were not already too much to swallow, Avalon goes one step further by having leading man Joel Lawrence morph into a woman in the person of Holly Hollywood. He handles this nonsense even worse than Blake Edwards (see the execrable "Switch", a 1991 film that perhaps Avalon admires). Holly begins by comical shock at having lost a dick (for the second time, since it was bitten off in Part 1, but regenerated via a little- known power of vampyres, probably the "y" spelling did the trick), and dubbed at first with Lawrence's voice for less than side-splitting yocks.

Except for Nikita's sexiness dressed in latex, this one is hard to stomach. An orgy scene brings back my favorite player from Part 1, Wendi Knight, but she is wasted, wearing a red wig and merely humping away generically. Rather than capitalize on the favorable impression she made initially, James forgets to give her something interesting to do.

I would be interested to know if it was scheduling conflicts that gave rise to re-casting the movie, yet even if it was just a dumb idea on its own, Avalon would have done better to avoid the curse of sequilitis and have shot something entirely fresh. Ironically, he is trapped in the latter phase of his career cranking out nothing but sequels as Sweet Sinner's house director successor to founder Nica Noelle, shooting everything from My Daughter's Boyfriend 13 to The Stepmother 13.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed