Dropout (1970) Poster

(1970)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Quirky delight
LHL128 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
DROPOUT just recently played twice at the Hollywood Reel Independent Film Festival (HRIFF for short) and it was quite surprisingly entertaining and inventive, and it was frequently quite humorous as well. Apparently the producer, Carlo Ponti, "dropped out" of the movie during preproduction, but the director and the two leads decided to go ahead with it anyway, using their own funds and presales. The quality of the 16mm source print was rather sorry. It was apparently Tinto Brass's own well-worn print, the only material currently available, which had just been somewhat spiffed up for public presentation. Despite this, the originality showed through all the same. Escaped prisoner attacks an upper-class London home, robs the owner of his clothes, and takes his wife hostage. The wife, strangely unafraid, finds the new adventure an enjoyable break from her dull routine of housekeeping and gardening, and within moments finds herself in squalid dumps, in the midst of a violent union strike, in a meeting of black revolutionaries, in a flophouse, and then in an audition to turn tricks to help her captor travel to Italy to find his old girlfriend. During arguments the soundtrack switches to operatic arias as Franco Nero's character dances in time to the grievances. In keeping with the traditions of Italian Neorealism, the extras were actually found on location in the slums. There was even a group of meths drinkers who imbibe in their (prop) concoctions as Gigi Proietti's pimp character sang out his personal manifesto above them. There is no doubt in my mind that the chanting Hare Krishnas just happened to be marching by when Brass told his crew to capture them on film so that he could incorporate them into the story. And in keeping with the traditions of Tinto Brass, this striking Neorealism is continually blended with Theater of the Absurd. The results are unlike anything else.

I should here like to take issue with LOR_'s review. While what he says is mostly accurate (except that the scene where Franco kicks the cat was obviously faked), his opinions are, well, his opinions, just as my opinions are my opinions. It is true that a movie as quirky as this, with a story so unpredictable, would never be Number One on "Boxoffice" magazine's Top-Grossing Flicks of the Week, but Nero and Redgrave fans should get a thrill out of the proceedings, and so should pretty much anyone who enjoys absurdist and offbeat cinema. Franco was certainly never more motivated than he was in this little outing, and his relentlessly over-the-top performance was sheer perfection.

Toward the close of the HRIFF the host read an open letter from Franco Nero to Tinto Brass, written specifically for this festival. The letter was lengthy and Franco was full of effusive praise for Tinto and his brilliant films and working methods. He regretted that after the early 1970s filmmakers no longer had the luxury of realizing their dreams on celluloid come what may. He had the fondest memories of this movie and its making, as well as of its follow-up, VACATION, another comical gem shown twice at the HRIFF.

DROPOUT was barely released when it was new. A 16mm print was circulating among British colleges in the late 1970s, but after that the movie was withdrawn and shown nowhere except in Tinto Brass's living room. So one must wonder how LOR_ even got to see it in July 2011, unless he saw the irredeemably atrocious bootleg that was briefly available on an internet pirate site. It is understandable that someone enduring only that miserable pirated 4" x 5" edition would have a verdict so negative. A viewable edition on the big screen is a completely different experience.

We can hope for the day when this film is at last restored from the original masters and reissued. If Vanessa Redgrave and Franco Nero could host some screenings, this little indie could easily develop what "The Industry" calls "legs."
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Amateur horsing around by Franco, Vanessa & Tinto
lor_5 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
We are lucky that today's crop of superstars and wannabes don't crank out amateur movies the way their predecessors often did in the '60s and '70s. Case in point is this ego-trip by lovers Franco Nero and Vanessa Redgrave, under the tutelage of Tinto Brass, made back to back with a similar junker VACATION.

Even if you don't appreciate his latter-day erotica, you have to be thankful Brass emerged from his execrable experimental/"revolutionary" phase. Shot in London, this pretentious exercise in overacting plays like a home movie.

Franco portrays a bedraggled Italian bum Bruno in London who steals away lovely Mary Hopkins (Vanessa, looking great here even when they slop on "dirt makeup" to try and keep her in character) from her stuffy husband Robert, and the duo wander around purposely chosen ugly settings (junkyards and tenements) in an attempt to bore the viewer to death.

IMDb lists some misinformation presently -I suspect that the film was shot in English and dubbed in Italian (I saw the Italian version) rather than vice versa, and with no distributor listed the 1975 U.S. release date is undoubtedly false -I have no record of it ever having been distributed here.

We can tell where Brass is headed early on, with graffiti reading "The only poetry is the revolution" and "Work is anti-life". Mustachioed Nero wearing an odd bowler-style hat is overbearing, and the tastelessness of the film is revealed in his kicking a pesky cat through a window (no, on revolutionary films like this there is none of that bourgeois "no animals were harmed in the making of this film" disclaimer at the end) or urinating, sort of on camera.

Attempts at humor, such as occasional speeded-up footage with the cast behaving stiffly like Silent Era Keystone Cops, are ridiculous, and the supporting cast mixture of Brits and imported Italians all mug for the camera. Vanessa is permitted, even in the Italian-track version, to sing many ballads or folk songs at will in English, culminating late in the day with an obviously mean-spirited "God Save Our Queen".

Low point of the Primo Tempo is a sequence where they check in to a flop house one night, and both Black and white girls steal Vanessa's clothes, followed by a time capsule-style parade of Hare Krishna freaks. Duo's next stop is a slaughterhouse, followed by Vanessa freaking out and hallucinating.

Secondo Tempo brings Luigi Proietti into the fray, caught in the middle of a shave (with the foam on his chin stumping the continuity person for the first reel of Part 2). He and an idiot henchmen take over center stage, as if dispatched to save the flagging narrative, but fail. In fact Brass, with trademark stogie in his mouth, shows up himself as an erstwhile pornographer (natch) in a studio flanked by a giant phallus sculpture and rude artwork, to slap Vanessa around. Even Hitchcock at his most manipulative treated his cattle better.

Thugs next beat Nero to a pulp, and the bedraggled duo carry on a conversation with "shoe phones" right out of Don Adams' GET SMART handbook. To call this Theatre of the Absurd is an insult to that now mummified tradition, which peaked in the '60s.

Vanessa returns to her hubby, even kissing his foot, shining his shoes, lighting his cigar, cleaning his teeth with a toothpick, q-tipping his ears and (this being a Brass movie) wiping his backside in supplication. Hubby Robert puts a sack over his head and starts whipping her! Oh, those cwazy Brits!

With extremely poor continuity, F & V next pop up on a train where they make love with disembodied voice-over, the technique (though not the content) of a cheap porno film. They arrive at a foggy beach where Robert spots them again -cue the speeded-up slapstick footage.

SPOILER ALERT:

After they go to sleep near the beach covered in collected newspapers for warmth, Vanessa goes to the water next morning to splash her face and British bobbies arrive to arrest Nero. They beat him up, and the sounds of shots ring out, with Vanessa falling dead. Robert reappears and a bobby in closeup makes a shushing motion to the viewer for an absurdist freeze-frame ending.

I really disliked watching talented performers like Nero and his future wife pulling faces and hamming it up for nearly two hours of torture. Yes, this is much closer to Theatre of Cruelty for me, and I dread the rainy (torrential actually) day when I'll have to watch my DVD of VACATION for completeness' sake.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed