Twisted Nightmare (1987) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Twisted mess!
MrTaft14 February 2006
I had reasonably high hopes when first watching this "horror" of a movie, based on other IMDb users' reviews. I was quickly disappointed. After the ridiculous "firefly" opening credit sequence (or flaming ashes or whatever the hell they were supposed to be), we get to see the bulk of the cast preparing to head back to an old summer camp they used to frequent, having all won a free trip. None of them seem very enthusiastic due to events past, but since it's free and they can all catch-up with each other after a year or so they decide to go for it.

Later, when they're all there, tensions start building and people are at each other's throats over the "death" that happened last time they stayed at camp. The main character's boyfriend knows nothing of it, so some girls explain it to him - his girlfriend's mentally-challenged brother was burnt to death in a barn out front. We get a nice flashback that tells the whole story, except what the hell actually caused him to self-combust. The brother wanders into the shed in a sulk and inexplicably looks up to see a flashing red light, which makes him scream. Why? Next thing you know he bursts out of the barn on fire, and his sister appears from nowhere screaming in slow motion. Reeling from the news, the boyfriend is wary of the days ahead...

A few minutes later one of the couples is murdered in the same barn; no one notices. The next morning, more are murdered - no one notices. Each time a character disappears and is killed, no one knows they are gone, and when someone is asked of their whereabouts, they reply with some noncommittal answer. Some friends, eh? The killer is exposed as some half-human, half-beast creature that growls like a drowning zombie. Tracking him (apparently he's been there the whole time the group were last at camp) is the ground's caretaker, an Indian descendant who's ancestors were burned at the stake by Civil War soldiers. He claims one of them put a curse on the campground, and thinks this thing is the result. The film makes great play of hiding his motives... is he actually the killer or is he just out to stop the real one? He spends all of his time screaming and threatening the group and at one point nearly bursts into tears in front of one couple about his kittens - "I NEED 'EM!" he shouts.

Also coming on the scene later is the town sheriff, whom one of the girls manages to call before getting killed. He arrives in his old, '50s-vintage rust bucket that he had to get his granddaughter to help him fix in an earlier scene while a random African-American man sat watching in disbelief! I couldn't help but join him! Didn't the County Sheriff's department see fit for him to have a proper police vehicle? He's also very old and spends nearly a minute examining two victims in the dark before deciding to do something about it. He doesn't do much. At the end the killer is exposed as someone we know and the lead female character has something to do with it. Can her new boyfriend and the miserable old caretaker stop them in time before all are lost? Barely. The film also fails to tie up all loose ends, such as motive and what the hell exactly happened to the brother. Was it the old Indian curse or what that made him self-combust? This kind of writing affects the film badly. It is a shoddy mess, with what looks like a lot of ad-libbing and last-minute ideas. How someone could fund such a screenplay is beyond me. The characters are typical wannabees who think they're all so cool and spend their time doing nothing but drinking and moaning. I did like that older, mustached guy though. Can't remember the name. He drove the silver Ford Thunderbird that had sugar in the gas tank (another lame plot point). A lot of his lines are actually genuinely funny, although the scene where he snaps at the cabin and goes off at everyone, screaming "You're an asshole! F@#% you! And your brother was an asshole too! I'm glad he's dead!", etc is unintentionally hilarious. I was rolling around at that scene. The other actors just stare at him and you can tell one girl is trying not to laugh. Great stuff.

The same unfortunately cannot be said for the technical side of the film. The direction is uninspired and dull. Lighting in a lot of the scenes is poor and I don't know what was going on with the music, I don't even remember it. The gore scenes were fairly effective, though some parts defy belief (the first victim flying up in slow motion in the barn). There was quite a bit of blood and also some nudity, which never hurts. I also have to say that the acting is pathetic, although it looks like some of them really did try. It just didn't make a difference. The script however was the worst, and the fact that the director didn't do anything about it and fix the mistakes ruined the film. Not as bad as some of them, but not the best of the '80s slashers either. You can do much better in terms of sheer entertainment value.

Oh yeah, that ice shed was pathetic, too. Stocked year-round when no one has been there for over a year and ice is still in large, perfect blocks even with a hatch in the roof wide open and no obvious refrigeration source. The girl who is trapped in there also goes into hysterics after ten seconds, even though she thinks her friends did it... See what I mean about the acting?
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"This is my idea of roughing it".
lost-in-limbo23 October 2010
"Twisted Nightmare" won't pull out any surprises as it's a deranged, if run-of-a-mill camp-based slasher, but it does have some interesting novelties ranging from the fact it was filmed around the same time as "Friday the 13th Part 3" (to only be released a couple years later) and that in was shot in the same area as that film too. Those would remember the barn of doom (and again it seems to hold some sort of attraction).

A group of old friends are mysteriously invited back to Camp Paradise, but no one has been there since the strange death of Matthew (a simple kid who was picked on by them). His death was unexplainable as he was turned into a scorching human torch and the body was never found. So the friends are together again along with Matthew's sister, but not too soon one-by-one the group start getting picked off.

For being a low-end slasher it has its recycled conventions, but it was a competently done (on the technical side) for what it is. A quickie, but well delivered slasher that reminded me of a cheaper version of woodland slashers "The Burning" and "Madman". The killer is pretty much in the same mould as "Madman" --- an unstoppable scruffy brute that's disfigured and who likes to growl. The story is old-hat (despite an interesting back-story about how the campsite is cursed) with a sluggish beginning before getting on with things before leading onto a insanely predictable revelation, the forced dialogues are lame and the acting for most part is bad (leaden or ripe). However it does bestow a healthy body count throws about the nudity quite freely and has its nasty moments. Junky and cheesy, but entertaining. Director Peter Hunt uses the locations rather well, but it seems to work better during the night sequences with the cat and mouse chases between the bulky killer and self-obsessed victims. There are some atmospheric touches with beaming blue lighting and mist, but even then the vision can become quite murky and editing rather jerky (like the first death sequence). The death scenes are hit or miss, some coming off while others not so. Moments do become laughable, like the use of slow-motion. The music is an unhinged, but mangled mixture sounding ominous but then breaking into something sunny and bright.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A jumbled up mess of clichés that lacks any real punch
LuisitoJoaquinGonzalez13 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
So you like clichés eh? Well, I'll give you clichés alright. I'll give you so many clichés that you'll loose count before the ten-minute mark!

Completed in eighty-two, but shelved for five years due to a total lack of confidence from the entire production team, Twisted Nightmare is not a movie. It may have a cast and a crew and all the ingredients that you would associate with a feature film, but in fact it's just a check-list of slasher platitudes rapped up into ninety-minutes of cheap videotape and cunningly disguised as a motion picture. What you don't believe me? Then why don't you check out this fabulous synopsis:

A group of 'ahem' teenagers head off to a summer camp (Friday the 13th) where a few years earlier, the brother of one of their number was burned beyond recognition by an unseen menace. (The Burning). Before the accident, he had been the victim of malicious bullying by the rest of the group, who tormented his inability to attract the opposite sex (Terror Train). This particular camp site is not the best place for a summer vacation as it had been cursed by Native Americans many years ago and it's rumoured that the curse lives on (Ghost Dance). Before long a disfigured lunatic turns up and begins killing off the cast members one by one. (Just about every slasher movie ever produced).

Now do you believe me?

In all seriousness, Twisted Nightmare is an uncomfortably tough film to review. That's simply because it's hard to explain exactly what went wrong with the feature and why it never lived up to its obvious potential. It's not an awkward task to write a mocking review of a bad movie, but it's a lot harder to try and define the reasons why an offering so full of possibilities just didn't make the grade. It would be easy to blame the rancid dramatics or the inane scripting, but the cast of Friday the 13th were hardly method actors and that was still an infinitely better effort than this. Slasher flicks are different from almost every other genre, because they can still make a profit or at least grab an audience without most of the ingredients that other categories of cinema take for granted. For example, could you imagine a poorly acted drama being successful? Or perhaps an awfully scripted comedy? Stalk and slash features consistently commit gross cinema crimes and still the production line of titles shows no sign of slowing down.

If anything, Twisted Nightmare tries too hard and due to the director's insistence of ticking every single box on the slasher check list, the movie breaks that age-old 'less is more' ground rule. Alfred Hitchcock once said that the key ingredient to the production of suspense is isolation, but that's where Paul Hunt's opus comes unstuck. His feature boasts an unusually high body count and there's also some impressive gore sequences. Unfortunately, with so many characters getting butchered in such a small space of time, things get very boring very quickly and the deaths rapidly loose their impact.

Another negative is the film's one-tone pacing, which never seems to change throughout the runtime. Characters get killed, characters get naked. Characters make-out and characters argue, but it all happens at such a snail-like momentum that that any attempts at a 'money-shot' just pass by without recognition. The plodding direction adds no bite to the suspense scenarios and an infuriating lack of lighting takes the credit away from Cleve Hall's decent make-up effects. The script doesn't help matters and the plot is littered with more holes than a hash smoker's mattress. Cast members are slaughtered and none of their colleagues question their disappearances and some of the gaps in continuity are so obviously dumb that it's almost unbelievable that this was the effort of a man with as much cinematic experience as Paul Hunt.

The slasher genre is no stranger to poor movies. However, if you take an experienced director, a good budget, an excellent location, some great gore effects, a group of ambitious cast members and still end up with a feature as jumbled as this, then something is very, very wrong.

On the plus side as I mentioned earlier there's some decent gore and as many people have noted previously, Nightmare generates an eighties feel much better than many of its counterparts from the period. It's also worth noting that this was one of the first slashers to incorporate African-American victims into its body count, which is an interesting piece of trivia. But aside from that there's really nothing here to recommend and the movie only remains notable for being one of the biggest wastes of potential in the history of splatter cinema.

It's impossible to recommend Twisted Nightmare to anybody as it really is that irredeemably bad. At least its original production date of 1982 means that it was among the first of its ilk and I guess that makes it slightly collectible. As I said in my opening sentence, this is not much of a feature film. It's best remembered as a long-winded collection of poorly-delivered clichés.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Decent Slasher
Michael_Elliott23 November 2017
Twisted Nightmare (1987)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

A group of adults win a weekend pass to the summer camp that they once attended when they were younger. Once there the party starts but before long a death from their past will come back to kill them one by one.

TWISTED NIGHTMARE is a slasher film that got a limited theatrically release before hitting VHS where it became a minor cult favorite. The film pretty much went away for a while but it has slowly picked up another cult following thanks to it simply being a slasher as well as it being shot at the same place that Friday THE 13TH PART III was. The barn and house from that Jason movie is used here so it is pretty cool getting to see the same location used.

As far as the actual film goes, look, you're dealing with a low-budget horror movie that was made by people just trying to make some money. The Slasher 101 Handbook is pretty much followed throughout as we get the backstory, we get the camp setting, the partying, the nudity and of course a mysterious old man and several bloody deaths. There's obviously nothing new or original here but for the most part it kept me entertained. If anything director Paul Hunt at least got some atmosphere out of the material, which is a plus.

The death scenes are decent for what they are as there is at least some blood being thrown around. If nudity is your thing then you'll be happy to know that several of the young ladies here get totally naked. The one major problem with the film is the cinematography. The film's lighting was so poor that often times the scenes are beyond dark. I'm sure this issue was even worse for those watching this on a bootleg or VHS. The Blu-ray has at least been cleaned up but it's still quite dark due to the way the film was shot.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Twisted? Definitely! Nightmare? Maybe.
reptilicus29 December 2004
I found this movie way back on a shelf in my closet. I had to blow the dust off the video box to read the title. With our curiosity aroused my wife and I sat down to watch it. When it was finished she made me promise to clean out the closet more often!

Among the slasher sub-genre this is a forgotten film; and perhaps we'd all be better off if it stayed that way. It is certainly disjointed enough to seem like a dream and there are plot points which we think will be important but which are forgotten immediately after they are introduced. The film begins with an American Indian Medicine Man being burned at the stake by Cavalry troops for allegedly practising black magic. He vows to return from the dead for revenge. Flash forward 200 years (give or take a decade) to some college pals returning to a campsite where they spent a summer holiday a few years before.

Now here is where the plot gets going. The retarded brother of one of the kids was burned to death in an accident, after which the group all went their separate ways; apparently through a collective feeling of guilt. Hardly has night fallen before someone starts getting rid of the visitors one by one in increasingly gory ways. Is it a resurrected Indian spirit? Has the burned boy come back from the dead? Does the dead boy's sister know more than she is saying about what is happening? Will you hit the fast forward button on the remote? Only the answer to the last question is obvious!

The plot is so full of holes even the minimal gore cannot save the plot. In fact the few bloody moments are photographed so dark you can barely see what is happening. The "tearing an arm out by the roots" scene was done much better, and clearer, in the equally obscure Bigfoot movie NIGHT OF THE DEMON.

This one is for lovers of obscure movies only . . . and even they will come away from it scratching their heads in disbelief.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Fairly poor and generic slasher attempt...
paul_haakonsen24 July 2022
I had the opportunity to sit down to watch the 1987 horror slasher movie "Twisted Nightmare" here in 2022. Sure, I had never heard about the movie, but of course I opted to watch it on account of it being a horror movie.

However, I have to say that writers Paul Hunt and Charles Philip Moore only managed to churn out a very mediocre and generic mid- to late-1980s horror cheese here with this movie. I mean, it was your archetypical slasher movie of where most of the killing was done in near-darkness so you couldn't really see what was going on. And forget about getting to see the killer, that was not happening either. So yeah, very much 1980s cheese right here.

The storyline in the movie was generic and bland. Sure, it might have worked out in 1987, but the movie hasn't aged well, and it just wasn't outstanding enough to manage to survive the passing of time. So you're not in for a particular great horror experience, should you opt to sit down and watch director Paul Hunt's "Twisted Nightmare".

The acting performances in the movie were actually adequate enough, taking into consideration the sheer level of cheese this movie turned out to be.

There are far better 1980s horror slasher movies out there, such as "Friday the 13th", "A Nightmare on Elm Street" or even "Halloween".

My rating of "Twisted Nightmare" lands on a generous three out of ten stars.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Leaves no cliché unticked.
BA_Harrison23 November 2016
Some old school friends each win a free weekend at Camp Paradise, the place where they all used to go on vacation together when they were younger. While there, a superhuman, growling man-beast bumps them off one-by-one (except for the couple making love outside… he kills both of them at the same time).

On the slasher horror checklist, this one ticks all the boxes and then some: you got a group of horny teenagers in a remote woodland retreat, multiple kills, lots of gratuitous female nudity (all the girls gets their clothes off at some point), mullets, an old man who warns the kids "you're all going to die!, a flashback scene, an Indian burial ground and an ancient curse.

So why the low rating? Well, there is not one ounce of originality in the whole thing, the kills occur mostly off-screen and are relatively gore-less (the kid having his arm torn off and the cop losing his head being the notable exceptions), the acting is atrocious (the OAP sheriff winning my award for worst performance), and a lot of the action is way too dark (except for some of the night-time woodland scenes which are back-lit with a 10000w blue lamp that can be seen from outer space).

At the end, it should come as no surprise to anyone as to who has been behind the killings.

3.5/10, rounded up to 4 for the party scene, which sees our happy campers making merry to some of the worst music imaginable. Those wild and crazy kids.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The director should get a Darwin award
Opacus_Music15 March 2021
A lot of movies are intentionally dumb for comedic purposes like Troma movies for example, but when a movie that's trying to be legitimately "horror" manages to be dumber than the dumbest of the intentionally dumb, you know you got something special here. It did manage to get some unintentional laughs out of me but the overall result is ultimately extremely boring. Thank god there was some eye candy in the form of some easy on the eye women taking their clothes off for good measure but its still quite the sleeping pill to swallow

In the "Slasher horror cliche" department, not a stone was left unturned albeit without the gore. Its all very mild and you don't see any graphic violence on camera.

I would never recommend something like this other than if you're actually looking for a very very bad boring film to put you to sleep because nothing else worked.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
No...
BandSAboutMovies22 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Directed and written by Paul Hunt (Wild, Free & Hungry, The Psychedelics, The Clones) and shot by Gary Graver, which is pretty much the whole reason I picked it, Twister Nightmare comes very, very late to the slasher cash-in year of 1981, but oh well, right?

Look, if you get a letter telling you that you won a weekend at Camp Paradise and at some point in the past someone whose mom may or may not be a friend of the Christy's died there and all sorts of rumors of doom keep smacking you in the face, you should probably not go.

That said, there are a lot of dudes in half shirts and Graver knows how to shoot a monster in the woods, all blue lights and fog. If this movie were just those scenes on a loop, I would probably like it more.

This movie is so thirsty to be a Jason movie that it was shot on the same set as Friday the 13th Part III and even has homage, err, rip-off of the pitchfork 3D kill from that movie. It also takes a kill from Silent Night, Deadly Night and then decides that its killer can call down lightning as if it were Christopher Lambert whitewashing a movie role.

That said, not many movies have their slasher use hot stones to beat someone to death.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Murky and muddled slasher.
HumanoidOfFlesh25 April 2010
Paul Hunt's "Twisted Nightmare" was actually made in 1982 and in the same setting of "Friday the 13th Part III".The film was withheld until 1987.It's easy to see why.A group of teenagers go to a lakeside camp named Camp Paradise built on an ancient Indian burial ground.Two years ago mildly retarded and virginal Matthew was burned alive in the barn.His charred body was never found.Two years later the teens are invited back to camp where demonic killer starts slaughtering them."Twisted Nightmare" rips off "Friday the 13th","The Ghost Dance" and "The Burning" and offers plenty of clichés.There is nudity galore and the bodycount is quite high,but all sixteen killings are shown mostly off-screen.The acting is pretty amateurish too.6 out of 10.Now let's go and explore the barn.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Basic run of mill and without any charm
acidburn-107 December 2022
'Twisted Nightmare' is a very basic 80's slasher flick with supernatural elements that's unoriginal in almost every way and features terrible acting, poor editing, bizarre plot-holes and lacking any real suspense whatsoever. It's not hard to see why this sat on the shelf for 5 years before being released and why the genre was falling out of favour, this flick is about as run of mill as it gets.

The plot = A group of teens win a trip to a summer camp they attended a few years ago, since the tragic accidental death of one of the teens Matthew. Soon after they arrive, they start getting killed off one by one and it becomes apparent that the tragic accident is linked with these recent killings.

Almost everything about this is a failure down to the awful special effects, the bad storytelling and lifeless direction that overuses the slow motion for no reason other than to pad out the running time. Despite having a large cast of characters, the murder set pieces are boring and lack any chills with some of the poorest lighting I've ever seen. The only slight entertainment I got out of this is with the character Dean (Kenneth Roper Jr), he's the biggest a-hole you'll ever see, and his antics are a highlight in this film. However, the rest are totally forgettable, and the final twist ending was lame and totally obvious.

Overall 'Twisted Nightmare' is about as banal a slasher movie can get without any fun or charm.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Daryl must have hated the shoot
RobZombi20 February 2022
Staged in a really cool way plus stylish slow-motion shots, unfortunately too dark in places. Interestingly, Daryl Tong's first and only role, who plays the tough muscle man... he must have hated the shoot.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
So bad it's good.
demonchirps14 December 2007
I've just finished watching this movie with a mate and thought it was so bad it was great. Firstly I thought the overall look of the film as well as the gore were quite good (not great but good). While the plot is very basic and flawed, it is the bad acting that really makes this movie fun to watch. Often you will watch a movie where all the actors are putting in such a bad performance that they have a certain chemistry between them. With this movie not only are they all acting poorly, but they have no chemistry with one another at all. Extra bad points go to the muscle Asian guy Tak who never changes expression or tone, and the aggressive moustache boyfriend with the over the top bad attitude. It is the bad acting that make this film enjoyable. If you want a good and effective horror movie then stay away. If you want a good unintentional laugh, then check it out.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Trite horror
lor_27 March 2023
My review was written in September 1988 after a screening at Liberty theater on Manhattan's 42nd Street.

"Twisted Nightmare" is a perfunctory horror film bringing back to null effect rather corny genre themes. Ongoing theatrical release is unwarranted compared to many direct-to-video titles, though pic has a catchy moniker.

Main mystery stems from pic's origins: print caught had a 1982 copyright (in Roman numerals) on-screen, het ad materials and date of MPAA rating imply the film actually was made in 1987. Pic probably is fresh, but plays like the look-alike films made at the beginning of the decade when horror boomed.

A group of young people are summoned to Camp Paradise, where they camped regularly until two years ago when Mathew, the brother of pretty brunette Laura (Rhonda Gray), died mysteriously in flames. Confused storyline blames the subsequent one-by-one murdes of the cast members on those old standbys: (1) ancient revenge against the white man (plus a black couple for good measure) for desecrating Indian burial ground, the site of the camp, and for massacring local Indians (only survivor was a medicine man, whose grandson is tghe sinsiter farmhand-type resident of the camp), and (2) unbalanced Laura's obviously telegraphed need to avenge her bro's death.

Gory killings are standard for horror flicks, while Paul Hunt's execution of a "Friday the 13th" or "The Outing" type screenplay is relentlessly dull. Cast is attractive but the acting is flat. Big, hairy monster (mainly shown in silhouette) is disappointing.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Camping in the 1980's … ALWAYS a bad idea!
Coventry28 June 2010
Strictly speaking in terms of 80's slashers, "Twisted Nightmare" really isn't as bad as some of my fellow reviewers make it out to be. Admittedly the plot is overly simplistic, the pacing is a bit slow and the acting performances are humiliatingly bad, but there are also a handful of good aspects. The body count, for example, is quite high (around 12) for a low-budget slasher and practically all the female cast members go topless. And yes, they're all quite pretty. The murder sequences are also reasonably gruesome and the set pieces are guaranteed to be good as well, since the film used the exact same sets as one of the earlier "Friday the 13th" sequels. Two years after her brother died in a horrible camping accident, Laura and all of her high school friends return to the Camp Paradise site where they used to spend all their holidays together. The site is build on an ancient Indian burial ground, however, and Laura's mentally retarded brother died because he wandered off in the barn all by himself and spontaneously caught fire. On their first night already, some members of the group encounter a savage and forceful beast that clearly intends to slaughter the entire gang. Luckily the script doesn't elaborate too much on the whole Indian curse/desecrated burial ground aspect, because I'm quite allergic to Indian spells and gibberish after too many movies like "The Dark Power", "Poltergeist" etc… In fact, the script doesn't elaborate too much on anything. With all the butchering going on, there isn't much time left for plot development, tension building or surprise twists. The only sub plot centers on the "rescue attempt" of the local Sheriff who looks approximately 105 years of age. The acting performances are hilariously bad! Especially the beefcake Asia guy and the arrogant mustache bloke easily rank among the worst slasher victims in 80's horror history. "Twisted Nightmare" honestly isn't a complete waste of time. It's reminiscent to decent slashers like "The Burning", "Night of the Demon", "Madman" and it features a really cool axe-through-back-of- the-head kill.

PS: the cover illustration on the IMDb page is NOT from "Twisted Nightmare", but from some David DeCoteau flick about an Aztec Mummmy
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Amusing, and an absolute disaster
drownsoda909 February 2019
"Twisted Nightmare" follows a young woman who is invited to her childhood summer camp for a free weekend getaway along with a large group of her old friends. Once there, the campers start to die off rather briskly, and it may have something to do with the camp's situation on sacred Native American land.

This obscure supernatural slasher is an admitted mess of a film--a cobbled-together amalgam of slasher tropes that rips off everything from "Friday the 13th" to "Silent Night, Deadly Night," and attempts to explain itself (sort of) via supernatural mythos that frankly makes no sense.

In retrospect, it's obvious that "Twisted Nightmare" was a troubled production, a case of too many cooks in the kitchen, if you will. And while most of it is trite and badly-acted, there is a considerable amount of fun to be had here, especially (or perhaps only) for fans of '80s slasher films. The film, for all its misgivings, is quite atmospheric, and the set (which you may recognize from "Friday the 13th Part III" lends some nice ambiance. The cinematography is also, though inconsistent, fairly moody, and there are some fantastic silhouette shots of the hulking, growling villain, backlit with cold blue light. The characters (and there is a large number fo them) are more or less disposable, and the actors are inexperienced and most can hardly deliver their lines, but this weirdly adds to the charm.

I think the main problem with "Twisted Nightmare" is that it doesn't have its own mythos properly worked out, and conclusion is as utterly confounding as what precedes it. There is no throughline and little consistency to speak of, but there are some atmospheric moments, a fairly creepy killer, and enough murder scenes to keep diehard genre fans amused. A mess, but an offbeat and fairly amusing one. 6/10.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Yow, this is BAD!
Wizard-828 November 2000
We don't look for great scripts or direction with a slasher movie, but this movie's screenplay and direction are SO BAD, it's enough to change your opinion and make you seek out an art movie instead. Sure, there's a big body count, but the killings for the most part are either not explicit, or too dark to see. In fact, almost all of the non-slasher scenes are equally as dark! There are also some really big holes in the script that will even have the most forgiving fan of slashers groaning in disbelief. It's no wonder this movie was shelved for five years, then dumped quietly on video.
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
* out of 4.
brandonsites198126 May 2002
Dumb, moronic film was shelved for 5 years (completed in '82, released in '87), because of poor pacing, editing, and horrible death scenes. What little plot there is, is about teenagers winning a vaction to a camp they once attended when they were younger. However once they get there and people start turning up missing they start to believe that the disapperances have something to do with the accidental death of a friend at the camp years earlier. Sound familiar??

Rated R; Graphic Violence, Sexual Situations, Profanity, and Graphic Nudity.
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed