Vanishing Act (TV Movie 1986) Poster

(1986 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
19 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Competent Remake
Chase_Witherspoon31 October 2010
Addictive thriller has Mike Farrell as a distraught husband whose wife has gone missing from their holiday house in the mountains after an apparently minor conflict. Newly transferred police chief (Gould) initially spends more time attempting to source his favourite pastrami sandwich, but soon discovers there might be more to the alleged disappearance than meets the eye. When the missing wife miraculously reappears (Kidder) Gould returns to his sandwich priorities except Farrell is insisting that the woman claiming to be his missing spouse, is not his wife.

Classic mystery is an engaging remake of the 1976 James Fanciscus telemovie "One of My Wives is Missing" with a capable cast which features Gould as an enigmatic detective with more going on between the ears than he lets on, while Kidder is an almost haunting presence in the role previously played by Elizabeth Ashley. The situations are taut and the dialogue is careful in containing the mystery until the last scene which is a cracker.

The only liabilities are the telemovie budget which limits the scope of the production and the casting of, while talented performers, actors who are sometimes difficult to separate from their long time small-screen alter egos (BJ Hunicutt and Herman Munster occasionally remembered in the performances of Farrell and Gwynne). In this respect, although the original Franciscus movie has more credibility as a serious thriller, "Vanishing Act" still leverages a superbly conceived idea with enough potential to please the matinée audience for whom this was intended.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Who Says T.V. Movies Can't Be Good?
sbox20 September 1999
Margot Kidder (Superman), Fred Gwynne (My Cousin Vinny), Elliot Gould (MASH), Mike Farrell (MASH), and Graham Jarvis (Journyman Project 1-3), lend their collective acting talents to this fine made for tv movie. Great effort.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
cool for when it came out...
dopeyharp017 January 2007
Mike Farrell played B.J. Hunnicut on the television show M*A*S*H, and Elliot Gould played Trapper John in the movie!

The actors did a decent job - most likely knowing it was going to be a TV movie.. not that there's anything wrong with that. It was different, and if you watch it just to see Fred Gwynne, that'd be all right.

It's a "whodunnit?" like no other.. unless there are others like it!

I remember watching this when it first came out on television. I suppose that's why I like it. I'd also like to watch "The Washington Papers" also starring Eliott Gould. Mike Farrell definitely plays a different character then he did on M*A*S*H.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
My Favourite Movie of all Times!!
markef7 June 2004
What a fabulous Movie. The Cast includes Elliott Gould, Mike Farrell, Margot Kidder and Fred Gwynne (of the Munsters fame). The story has more twists and turns than a tin of worms, but you are kept in suspense right up until the end. What a great plot. I have seen this movie more than a dozen times, I have it on VHS but would love to buy it on DVD, but unfortunately it does not seem to be available at this stage. Mike Farrell plays the distraught husband (Harry) whose wife seems to be missing, while Elliott Gould is great as the Lieutenant of Police and one of my favourite actors Fred Gwynne plays the Priest. Margot Kidder is also great in this Movie. And how could we forget "Max" the dog? I would equally rate this move with another called "Murder Ordained" which I also have on VHS and also DVD. I would recommend "Vanishing Act" to anyone who loves a great mystery with plenty of twists to the plot. I rate it 9/10
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The plot may not hold up to close scrutiny ... but the movie is enjoyable ....
merklekranz14 April 2012
Elliott Gould in "Vanishing Act", reminds me somewhat of his performance in the excellent "The Silent Partner". His character in both films seems to be grossly underestimated. The acting here is totally acceptable, and the Levinson - Link "Columbo" writing influence is fairly obvious. I am not sure if the intricate plot will hold up to close scrutiny, but the movie is enjoyable. The mountainous ski resort location is not taken advantage of at all, and as another reviewer has mentioned, the limited sets smack of the TV budget. All that being said, a non obvious script is the strong point here, and it will not disappoint those looking for the unexpected. - MERK
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A -good- TV movie --- go figure!
Nic Cage-218 January 1999
This is about as good as a TV-movie can get. I saw it when it first appeared on TV in 1986, and looked for it for the next 12 years, as it couldn't be found on video, then without warning, this excellent film hit video and cable on The Mystery Channel. The plot is not original, but it is a clever idea to borrow, and it has a helluva twist at the end, and it leaves you hanging all the way until that last minute. Fred "Herman Munster" Gwynne does a wonderful job, as well as Mike "MASH's B.J. Honeycutt" Farrell.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of My Favorite Movies Ever
claudio_carvalho20 May 2013
In the Rocky Mountains, Harry Kenyon (Mike Farrell) seeks out his missing wife Chris Kenyon in the Winter Parade. Harry meets Lieutenant Rudameyer (Elliott Gould) and tells that he is from San Francisco and has just married Chris, who is from Philadelphia, in Las Vegas. They traveled to the Rockies in honeymoon and they had an argument on the previous day and Chris left their isolate cabin driving her car. Harry also tells that he is worried with her disappearance since she is not a good driver.

Harry returns to his cabin and receives a phone call from the local priest, Father Macklin (Fred Gwynne), who summons him to go to the church. Father Macklin tells that Chris (Margot Kidder) is in the church waiting for him. When Harry sees Chris, he tells that she is not his wife; but the woman knows details of their lives and Harry is discredited by the evidences. Is a stranger impersonating Chris or is Harry delusional?

"Vanishing Act" is one of my favorite movies ever and very difficult to be found. I saw this movie in the 80's, borrowed on VHS from a video rental, and since then I have not had the chance to see it again. The VHS is rare; it was inexplicably not released on DVD or Blu-Ray; and is not available for download. Yesterday I found a Youtube with "Vanishing Act" divided in three parts and that was the chance to see it again.

"Vanishing Act" has a top-notch screenplay, with several plot points and the truth is only disclosed in the last scene. Elliott Gould has one of his best performances in the role of the witty New Yorker Lieutenant Rudameyer and Joel Cohen built in "Fargo" the character Marge Gunderson performed by Frances McDormand that recalls the cool behavior of Rudameyer. Margot Kidder is very gorgeous and Fred Gwynne is very funny. Mike Farrell gives credibility to his character and makes the viewer sympathize with his situation. Maybe I have exaggerated a little giving a ten to this movie, but I really love it and I believe it will please any viewer. My vote is ten.

Title (Brazil): Not Available
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
great movie...Keeps you guessing until the end...
crowe19998 March 2001
This is a great movie for those Who love old fashion mysteries. Harry reports to Lt.Rudameyer that his wife Chris is missing.

Chris shows up with Father Macklin, and this is when the fun begins. Elliot Gould, Margot Kidder And Mike Farrell are great...But Fred Gwynne is wonderful as Father Macklin. Check it out!!!!!
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An absolute gem of a movie
BlokeWithABrainUK26 January 2009
Completely forgotten and overlooked, this is a murder-mystery par excellence.

Not generally a favourite genre of mine, I stumbled across this movie on TV late one night years ago and never forgot it. I then managed to track it down on an ancient VHS quite recently and watched it again. It was every bit as good as I remembered.

No special effects, no overblown budgets. Just a cracking script, superb performances, tight and efficient direction and one of the best twists ever.

An absolute masterclass in small budget movie-making.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
If you believed this movie, I have a bridge to sell you...
Charles-3121 January 2002
Warning: Spoilers
I'm shocked by all of the positive comments about this movie. Yes, it does have one surprise that was kinda interesting. But, the plot does not hold together. It relies on a large set of completely unbelievable coincidences and mystery story cliches. Only a script writer could get these characters to do exactly what they needed to when they needed to do it and ignore routine things that normal people would do because they would end the story right away. Why did the detective never simply have the wife's drivers license picture wired to him, or, should you think you are sure of the answer to that one, why didn't the husband insist on the same? Were there any deviation, they plot would have all fallen apart. I won't get into any spoilers, but after you get the big surprise, you'll find yourself beginning to ask "what about...?" and "But...". There's a big "but, what if" there that I love to think of the consequences of.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lot of suspense
waldorfsalad9 March 2000
Warning: Spoilers
You won't be bored for a minute with this one, it's very well-written and it's got some really neat plot twists. It's an interesting role for Mike Farrell who is very believable as the suspect and Margo Kidder ones again shows us what a fine actress she is. Elliott Gould, as the police inspector, is fantastic and Fred Gwynne, good old Fred, is swell as the clergyman. A great cast, a great plot, great direction, next time they run it, be sure to record and save it for a rainy afternoon with the family.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Slightly Superior Remake of a Clever Television Mystery
theowinthrop18 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
In 1976 Jack Klugman, James Franciscus, and Elizabeth Ashley made a clever television mystery, ONE OF MY WIVES IS MISSING, which is about a weird extortion scheme by an impostor. It was remade (in my opinion slightly better) in 1986 with Elliot Gould, Mike Farrell, and Margot Kidder in the lead roles. I say better because, while the supporting cast of ONE OF MY WIVES IS MISSING, was good, this remake had Fred Gwynne in a pivotal role as a somewhat shady clergyman - an ally of Kidder's in her scheme. There was also a nice bit by that underrated supporting actor Graham Jarvis (MARY HARTMAN, MARY HARTMAN) as a holistic doctor who gets dragged into the mystery. Finally the writer/producers in this were the creators of Lt. Columbo, William Link and Richard Levinson. They improved the script a bit, particularly with Gwynne's role.

The story is the same - Farrell is the newlywed husband who had an argument with his wife, and she left their cabin in high dudgeon. When he reports this to officer Elliot Gould, suddenly the door opens and Kidder comes in begging Farrell's forgiveness for the argument and her snit. But Farrell insists she is a fake. Gould, thinking he's been the victim of a joke, leaves disgusted. And then Kidder reveals her larcenous demands on Farrell unless he wishes to have serious problems with the law. Farrell, forced to go along with her demands, keeps looking for a chance to get Gould to come back and investigate a bit more. But when Gould reappears a "witness" shows up to support Kidder - a Catholic clergyman played by Gwynne. Of course once Gould leaves again, Farrell faces now two extortionists working some badger game on him.

Again the tension is maintained by a good cast and the improved dialog of the script. What is going on? Where is Farrell's wife, and what have Kidder and Gwynne done with her? Will Jarvis, who has stumbled into the mystery accidentally, help Farrell overcome these villains? And what is Gould up to...for he to begins acting oddly after awhile?

Again the ending catches the viewer by surprise (unless they saw the original television film). Certainly worth catching if it is shown again as one of the best television mystery films.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Just about the best TV movie I've ever seen
RussianPantyHog10 July 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This is a truly excellent thriller which never lets up for a moment, racks up the tension wonderfully, and has a MONSTER of a twist at the end (which I won't reveal). Harry Kenyon (Mike Farrell) has a terrible problem. His wife Chris has vanished and suddenly up pops Margot Kidder impersonating her, just before the real Chris is due to inherit a fortune. He's trying desperately to get people to believe him, but no one will, especially the local chief of detectives (Elliott Gould). What the audience doesn't realise is that Harry Kenyon has a very (very) dark secret and the townspeople who refuse to believe him may know far more than they're letting on. This movie was good enough for a cinema release in my opinion and I promise you, it won't disappoint. 9 out of 10.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Hey, Charles B Owen I can answer that...
stillcrows196212 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILER ALERT: The simple plot point you used in your example was covered when the Priest and Mrs. Kenyan stated "clearly" that her car was stolen, along with her purse and I.D. The Detective knew all along about the truth of his wife, let's not forget that, so he "wouldn't" want to prove otherwise about the "other" Mrs. Kenyan. He could simply say he put in an order for the Driver's license but it's pending, and stall. Harry Kenyan wouldn't necessarily act any certain way, being that he's cornered himself into a specific set of rules so as not to reveal "himself". So he might not act as you'd think he should. Plus, he's a criminal, and criminals make mistakes. Neither side knows what the other is doing, and both sides are trying to work it out without revealing what "they" know. That's the brilliance of this "plot". The unraveling of incidents "is" frustrating, but that's why it draws you in "with" the characters. Don't you think they'd be frustrated as well? This is a wonderful movie, and it is a plausible plot that could, and in part has, happen(ed) in real life. I wish they'd remake this.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A little foul play on all sides!!
jaybabb5 April 2000
This movie begs us not to depend on appearances-the events in this film are not what they seem to be! Nor are all the people are who they say they are!! And $750.000 is at stake!!

I learned a lesson from reading Agatha Christie books-and I think it applies to this movie: If you suspect the person who is least likely to be suspected then he(or she)is likely to be guilty and, take whatever appears to be the truth-believe the opposite-then you are likely to come to the truth!!!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A great story, a watchable film.
Doctor_Bombay24 March 1999
Levinson and Link, the Columbo and McCloud guys threw together this modern mystery and it's too bad (that it's thrown together), because the story is quite marvelous, actually.

The film suffers from limited locations and characters. The casting is TV-Movie all the way with Mike Farrell, Margot Kidder, and Eliott Gould getting the bulk of the screen time. Fred Gwynne (don't we all love Fred Gwynne?) does a nice turn in a smaller role..

If you make it through the first 20 minutes of needless expanse, you'll wonder into an interesting little mystery with plenty of surprises.

Well worth watching on a rainy afternoon.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not bad for a remake
CVS-310 February 1999
I thought this was a pretty good TV movie. I had already seen "One of My Wives Is Missing" with Jack Klugman and James Franciscus, so I had a pretty good idea of what was about to happen next. Even with that it was an enjoyable movie, although "One of My Wives Is Missing" was better.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good cast can't overcome bad script
waia20008 September 2002
Elliot Gould, Fred Gwynne, Mike Farrell and Margot Kidder turn in reasonably good performances but the script is the factor that kills this TV movie. Farrell leads as a man whose wife went missing on their honeymoon. Elliot Gould holds his own as a cop transplanted from the Bronx to the Rocky Mountain boonies. The identity of the characters played by Margot Kidder and Fred Gwynne figure heavily into the mystery (such as it is) so I won't go into detail here.

This is not a total disaster -- it is watchable and somewhat interesting. Ultimately, though, it falls apart under the weight of the inferior script.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great
analoguebubblebath15 December 2002
Finally tracked down a copy of this movie on V(ideo) H(ome) S(ystem)

Not as good as what it is based on, "One Of My Wives Is Missing" but an enjoyable mystery nonetheless. Stars Margot Kidder in yet another unlikeable and smug role.

No fear Elliott Gould excels though.

7/10
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed