VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,9/10
1574
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaContaminated grain breeds overgrown, killer rats in this Golden Harvest production.Contaminated grain breeds overgrown, killer rats in this Golden Harvest production.Contaminated grain breeds overgrown, killer rats in this Golden Harvest production.
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe dogs had difficulty seeing in the rat costumes, so meat and blood was used to get them to run in the right direction in any given scene.
- BlooperWhen a man locks himself in the train car to get away from the rats, there is a faint dog barking sound. Dachshunds were used to play the rats and dressed in rat suits.
- Colonne sonoreSo Right
Written by Chuck McDermott
Performed by The Chuck McDermott Band
Recensione in evidenza
Tedious Mess
Interestingly enough, after this film came out in 82, it was immediately followed by Of Unknown Origin in 83 and then Rats in 84. What kind of originator of a minor genre craze could disappoint? Um, well, this one.
Easily the weakest of the rat films I've seen. The storyline diverges all over the place, forgets plot lines, crisscrosses with other ones at random only to forget them again and altogether makes little sense. This isn't surprising considering the credited sources. It's based on a novel, which was turned into a screenplay draft and then that draft was re-drafted into another screenplay. And all of it got mashed together into this unholy mess.
That wouldn't even be that big of a deal if the movie at least delivered some actual thrills and fun but it can't be bothered to do that. All the giant rats are actually small dogs in rat suits, and they're adorable to the extent you recognize them as such. The "terror" scenes are poorly plotted and lack imagination or tension. There's no B-movie bloodletting (Robert Clouse probably thought himself better than that, and he may well be, but saddled with this screenplay he should have known better).
Easily the weakest of the rat films I've seen. The storyline diverges all over the place, forgets plot lines, crisscrosses with other ones at random only to forget them again and altogether makes little sense. This isn't surprising considering the credited sources. It's based on a novel, which was turned into a screenplay draft and then that draft was re-drafted into another screenplay. And all of it got mashed together into this unholy mess.
That wouldn't even be that big of a deal if the movie at least delivered some actual thrills and fun but it can't be bothered to do that. All the giant rats are actually small dogs in rat suits, and they're adorable to the extent you recognize them as such. The "terror" scenes are poorly plotted and lack imagination or tension. There's no B-movie bloodletting (Robert Clouse probably thought himself better than that, and he may well be, but saddled with this screenplay he should have known better).
D’aiuto•23
- spencergrande6
- 12 dic 2016
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare una lista video per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Deadly Eyes?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 1.500.000 CA$ (previsto)
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Occhi nella notte (1982) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi