I saw this movie when it was released on TV in 1975, right about the time my own widowed grandmother discovered ballroom dancing. I was 17, living with her, and I wondered what in the world had gotten into her--makeup? Sparkly floaty dresses? Horrors! Now I am the same age she was at the time and I see the movie in a whole new light. Now I understand the emotions, the reactions of the family and a lot more. About the music in the film - it's very typical of movies in the '70s. The lighting and the tone are fitting for the story, which is about adults in the sunset years, but they are living their lives to the best of their ability under their circumstances! Give the movie a chance and try to see it with the eyes of someone understanding the feelings of your parents or grandparents. It will make a lot more sense to you over time.
26 Reviews
Bittersweet Story
jimddddd7 June 2010
Hard to believe that Maureen Stapleton was only 50 when she made this movie. Charles Durning was two years older. Yet they're portrayed as a couple of frumpy and hopeless old fogies--especially her--grabbing for some last romance before they reach the graveyard. I felt also that even though most of these characters appeared to be Jewish, their ethnicity was played down too much--perhaps to appeal to a general television audience. Regardless, the story realistically portrays a woman rescued at the last moment from her family and friends' expectations. Her children want her to be a sexless grandmother-cum-babysitter living in their spare bedroom, and her sister and friends think she should be a proper widow without an emotional life. Naturally they're disappointed when she decides to live the rest of her life as a free woman who still has desires and dreams. (Durning, on the other hand, was more of a cipher. He confides that he has a wife, but nothing more is said about her. Is she an invalid? Are they living apart?) The ending was a little abrupt, but I liked the film's message that we're never too old for romance. Who would make this movie today? More important, who would go see it? Well, how about all those aging boomers who are wondering about the many loves they found, lost, or never explored in the first place when they were younger.
Romance Is Not Just For The Young And Beautiful
boblipton8 January 2020
Maureen Stapleton's husband dies. Her friends start moving halfway around the world to California. One day, the waitress at the coffee shop suggests she join her for a night of ballroom dancing at the Stardust Ballroom. At first, Miss Stapleton has a horrid time; the man her friend fixes her up with is a fancy-schmancy dancer who dances around her. Somehow, she dances with Charles Durning and romance blooms. So do problems.
This award-winning TV movie was clearly aimed at the older demographics. Miss Stapleton was a triple-crown winner (Tony, Oscar, and Emmy for this movie), almost invariably cast in supporting roles; likewise, Durning was no one's idea of a matinee idol. Their aging, ordinary appearances is a primary point in this show.
It's a musical, although most of the numbers are recitatives, expounding on their thoughts. Although this movie is a minor affair, its themes and performances lift it out of the ordinary.
This award-winning TV movie was clearly aimed at the older demographics. Miss Stapleton was a triple-crown winner (Tony, Oscar, and Emmy for this movie), almost invariably cast in supporting roles; likewise, Durning was no one's idea of a matinee idol. Their aging, ordinary appearances is a primary point in this show.
It's a musical, although most of the numbers are recitatives, expounding on their thoughts. Although this movie is a minor affair, its themes and performances lift it out of the ordinary.
Unique
Mort & Spunky the awesome cat1 December 2001
The reasons I bought this DVD are because I'd rembered this film as being great fun (having seen it 15+ yrs ago on TV), Maureen Stapleton is a top drawer actress and I'm nearly as sentimental as the film.
But there is so much more. It's done quite creatively. The five or so bits where the two main characters sing their thoughts to themselves worked. Normally that would be difficult to pull off & Hollywood would flub it up. Part of the reason why I enjoyed it (or found it acceptable, which I normally wouldn't) is because it's quite apparent that they're from a generation raised to be selective about the thoughts they share, in stark contrast to today's society. It's also shot in a rather different manner, or have I forgotten how films of the 70s were photographed?
Queen of the Stardust Ballroom raises the moral bar by ignoring unwarranted judgements and dealing with more important matters.
And Maureen Stapleton... she's one class act and a brilliant actress.
But there is so much more. It's done quite creatively. The five or so bits where the two main characters sing their thoughts to themselves worked. Normally that would be difficult to pull off & Hollywood would flub it up. Part of the reason why I enjoyed it (or found it acceptable, which I normally wouldn't) is because it's quite apparent that they're from a generation raised to be selective about the thoughts they share, in stark contrast to today's society. It's also shot in a rather different manner, or have I forgotten how films of the 70s were photographed?
Queen of the Stardust Ballroom raises the moral bar by ignoring unwarranted judgements and dealing with more important matters.
And Maureen Stapleton... she's one class act and a brilliant actress.
A Widow and a postman rediscover their youth while ballroom dancing
nlaw12325 March 2006
The very fact that I remembered the exact title of this made for TV film after 36 years, says it all for me.
It was the first time I had ever seen Charles Durning or Maureen Stapleton as actors in any production, whether movie or television.
Their acting was superb -- understated and classy.
I was in my 20's when I saw this film and only now am I of a certain age where I can truly appreciate the feelings and emotions represented by these actors -- most of all it is Maureen Stapleton that made an impact on me.
A week ago, Maureen Stapleton died and right away, I said, "Queen of the Stardust Ballroom" -- such a good, warm thought to have upon hearing of someone's passing.
I would recommend this film to anyone!
It was the first time I had ever seen Charles Durning or Maureen Stapleton as actors in any production, whether movie or television.
Their acting was superb -- understated and classy.
I was in my 20's when I saw this film and only now am I of a certain age where I can truly appreciate the feelings and emotions represented by these actors -- most of all it is Maureen Stapleton that made an impact on me.
A week ago, Maureen Stapleton died and right away, I said, "Queen of the Stardust Ballroom" -- such a good, warm thought to have upon hearing of someone's passing.
I would recommend this film to anyone!
Brilliant!!!
Tim-17714 May 1999
This is a true tear-jerker. The songs are beautifully written and the performances are finely honed by all concerned. The only problem is that you may have trouble finding it, because it's not shown on television very often. But what a find it is! Have a box of Kleenex handy; you'll need it.
Fondly remembered examination of a weary life resuscitated by dancing and love.
Poseidon-38 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Love in the autumn years is examined in this tender, yet matter-of-fact, TV-movie that is presented as a quasi-musical. Stapleton plays a widow, used to catering to her husband's needs instead of her own, who begins to blossom under the mirror ball of a local dance hall, The Stardust. Reluctant at first to take part in the festivities, she is approached by sweet-natured mailman Durning and coerced into dancing. Soon, she has revitalized her life and herself, sometimes to the consternation of her sister Rae and her two grown children Sanders and Brandon. She and Durning strike up a late in life relationship that includes an unforeseen challenge or two. Stapleton, an actress who can say more than a lot of other ones with merely a glance or a faraway stare, does an excellent job throughout. The nature of the teleplay forces her to speak-sing a couple of numbers and this takes some getting used to, but once that conceit is adjusted to, it becomes less jarring. Durning, who is excellent as well in an atypical role for him, also has to do an internalized number and, like Stapleton, overcomes the obvious lack of a truly strong musical theatre voice. They make a charming and believable pair worth rooting for. Brandon, in a smallish role as Stapleton's long-haired, caring son, establishes a nice rapport with her. Sanders and Rae are on hand to offer some mild antagonism. The ballroom offers a wide array of amusing types, mostly past-their-prime folks who take pleasure in gussying up and tripping the light fantastic with one another. The dancing sequences (which aren't particularly elaborate, but are appropriate) were staged by no less than Marge Champion! In late 1978, this material was reworked a little (most of the songs replaced and new ones added, including the stunning "Fifty Percent") into the one-act Broadway musical "Ballroom", which starred Dorothy Loudon and Vincent Gardenia and was helmed by Michael Bennett. Compared to the smashing success of Bennett's prior "A Chorus Line", the show was deemed a disappointment and closed after 116 performances.
A sweet romance -- with major missing pieces
evening129 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I enjoyed this rare glimpse of middle-aged love until its simple-minded detour around the movie's central problem.
It is seriously out of character for straight-laced Bea (Maureen Stapleton) not to show the faintest disappointment (or maybe rage) when Al -- moments after making love to her for the first time -- reveals that he's married.
Bea's lack of curiosity and the movie's non-exploration of Al's situation killed this for me. Having the non-ill, 50ish Bea expire in her sleep added insult to injury. Cop out!
It was surprising to find that this movie is a kind of recitative musical -- certainly a unique flourish.
The film offers a few memorable lines:
"Life begins when your husband dies."
"I bet you make a great cup of coffee."
"I like how I look -- nobody asked you your opinion."
"How I love to dance how they used to dance, when the man in my arms is you.'
It is seriously out of character for straight-laced Bea (Maureen Stapleton) not to show the faintest disappointment (or maybe rage) when Al -- moments after making love to her for the first time -- reveals that he's married.
Bea's lack of curiosity and the movie's non-exploration of Al's situation killed this for me. Having the non-ill, 50ish Bea expire in her sleep added insult to injury. Cop out!
It was surprising to find that this movie is a kind of recitative musical -- certainly a unique flourish.
The film offers a few memorable lines:
"Life begins when your husband dies."
"I bet you make a great cup of coffee."
"I like how I look -- nobody asked you your opinion."
"How I love to dance how they used to dance, when the man in my arms is you.'
A Minor Masterpiece
LuvSopr12 December 2001
The pacing is overly rapid in certain places, Bea's sister and daughter are painted with a cartoonish brush, but the film manages to be genuinely moving and poignant throughout.
We are never asked to condone every change Bea makes; only to understand. Maureen Stapleton's human, subtly-keyed performance is the perfect centerpiece. Charles Durning is also wonderful in a role many actors would coast through. Once you see him here you'll never think of him in quite the same way again. These characters are so real, so everyday, that we can feel their joy and sorrow in ways cardboard types can't transmit.
The singing is jarring at first, but their shaky voices add to the realistic undertone of the fantasy.
Bea's unapologetic stance in her relationship with Al typifies the 70's and the 70's willingness to shake off conventions; I'm not sure if this tv-film would be made today with the same viewpoint.
I loved the atmosphere of the Stardust Ballroom, the different relationships and the nostalgia for days gone by. Bea comes alive in a room where most are trying to relive their past glories.
Flawless it may not be, but if you want to believe in love, in having a second chance at life no matter what your age is, this is the film to see.
We are never asked to condone every change Bea makes; only to understand. Maureen Stapleton's human, subtly-keyed performance is the perfect centerpiece. Charles Durning is also wonderful in a role many actors would coast through. Once you see him here you'll never think of him in quite the same way again. These characters are so real, so everyday, that we can feel their joy and sorrow in ways cardboard types can't transmit.
The singing is jarring at first, but their shaky voices add to the realistic undertone of the fantasy.
Bea's unapologetic stance in her relationship with Al typifies the 70's and the 70's willingness to shake off conventions; I'm not sure if this tv-film would be made today with the same viewpoint.
I loved the atmosphere of the Stardust Ballroom, the different relationships and the nostalgia for days gone by. Bea comes alive in a room where most are trying to relive their past glories.
Flawless it may not be, but if you want to believe in love, in having a second chance at life no matter what your age is, this is the film to see.
Disappointment
dmills924 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I was enchanted from the start. The music gave an air of wonderment that one could only expect to carry throughout the rest of the film. Main character, Bea, was a very sweet woman who was truly loved by her family, even her in-laws.
Bea's first song, after her husband had died, was so moving. "Who am I going to cook and clean for ... who's going to balance the check book." It showed so beautifully, how a long married couple can come to rely on each other even for the simple things; even just to be there. Her voice, too, was so weak and shaky, which made it strike an even deeper chord, one that a clear, perfect voice never could have.
Then Bea gets whisked off to the Stardust Ballroom by her friends and meets a very interesting man, who seems totally in love with her, if a bit pushy. But, Bea, ever so endearingly old-fashioned keeps him at arms length and sends him home to be sure nothing improper would take place. He's still enchanted. Awwww, how sweet.
Ha! That's when everything quite quickly changes, taking every bit of enchantment, beauty and old-fashioned sweetness out of the rest of the film. Bea invites her new beau, Al, up to her bedroom.
That may be excusable, and I may move on and still enjoy the remainder, but then the same Al who pursued Bea and got her into bed casually announces he's married and Bea decides they just won't discuss it. Ugh! They go on with their affair and she even tells her family, including grandchildren, that the man she's seeing is married.
This was all totally out of character. Taking him to her bedroom was unbelievable in the first place, but when you throw in Al's spouse it is unforgivable. It taints the entire movie and because of this disturbing and completely unnecessary twist I would not recommend it to anybody. The rest of the film would have been infinitely better without Al's wife.
Bea's first song, after her husband had died, was so moving. "Who am I going to cook and clean for ... who's going to balance the check book." It showed so beautifully, how a long married couple can come to rely on each other even for the simple things; even just to be there. Her voice, too, was so weak and shaky, which made it strike an even deeper chord, one that a clear, perfect voice never could have.
Then Bea gets whisked off to the Stardust Ballroom by her friends and meets a very interesting man, who seems totally in love with her, if a bit pushy. But, Bea, ever so endearingly old-fashioned keeps him at arms length and sends him home to be sure nothing improper would take place. He's still enchanted. Awwww, how sweet.
Ha! That's when everything quite quickly changes, taking every bit of enchantment, beauty and old-fashioned sweetness out of the rest of the film. Bea invites her new beau, Al, up to her bedroom.
That may be excusable, and I may move on and still enjoy the remainder, but then the same Al who pursued Bea and got her into bed casually announces he's married and Bea decides they just won't discuss it. Ugh! They go on with their affair and she even tells her family, including grandchildren, that the man she's seeing is married.
This was all totally out of character. Taking him to her bedroom was unbelievable in the first place, but when you throw in Al's spouse it is unforgivable. It taints the entire movie and because of this disturbing and completely unnecessary twist I would not recommend it to anybody. The rest of the film would have been infinitely better without Al's wife.
Well remembered performances
Morning Star13 January 2003
I haven't seen this film in over 20 years and yet I still recall scenes from it quite vividly. The performances by both Stapleton (who I was researching now when I saw this film in a list of her credits) and Durning are both wonderful. The characters seemed very "real"...even more so when the film came out, as back then middle aged+ characters were *very rare* as romantic leads in a movie. And it's also quite touching. I recall crying quite a bit near the end on the 3 occasions I saw this movie on TV years ago. Bravo to Stapleton and Durning for this one!
Magnificent!
tforbes-222 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This low-key, unassuming movie is clearly a true gem from the mid-1970s! It is remarkable such a movie could be produced at a time when rock music prevailed. Indeed, the scene when Maureen Stapleton's character is criticised by her daughter for her appearance (coloured hair, makeup) points up to the unreasonable expectations of age.
And indeed, we see the effort Ms. Stapleton's character makes in being her own woman. It mirrors what teens were going through then and now.
This movie would hit home for me in another way, in that I am reminded of older relatives who would tune in to see "The Lawrence Welk Show." The dance hall scenes look much like the show, though this setting is in New York City. The big band music works very well here, and is well done.
And the singing! Ms. Stapleton does a decent job, and Charles Durning is fantastic! You might indeed wonder if Lawrence Welk himself might have wanted Mr. Durning as one of his singers! No matter what, this is one of the best movies to come out in 1975!
And indeed, we see the effort Ms. Stapleton's character makes in being her own woman. It mirrors what teens were going through then and now.
This movie would hit home for me in another way, in that I am reminded of older relatives who would tune in to see "The Lawrence Welk Show." The dance hall scenes look much like the show, though this setting is in New York City. The big band music works very well here, and is well done.
And the singing! Ms. Stapleton does a decent job, and Charles Durning is fantastic! You might indeed wonder if Lawrence Welk himself might have wanted Mr. Durning as one of his singers! No matter what, this is one of the best movies to come out in 1975!
Four Stars for this Queen
edwagreen8 January 2006
True to life. Durning and Stapleton, the chemistry is perfect. Durning and Stapleton are phenomenal. A story for our times. Such comments are more than adequate for this fine story.
Bea Asher is widowed at middle age. She sings of her loneliness and the deprivation brought about by her husband's passing.Bea is about to settle down to a grim widowhood, when a waitress, in a restaurant, tells her that you start living once your husband has died.
Though this statement is shocking, Bea goes with the woman to the Stardust Ballroom, a carefree lounge where couples dance to their pleasure. While there, Bea meets postman Al Green and the two are a match made up in heaven. Bea dances up a storm, changes that gray hair to bright red and becomes a live-wire not quite almost as Stapleton depicted in Woody Allen's "Interiors." Life has more meaning now, despite the anger conveyed by her pristine daughter and sister, Helen, shown in a memorable scene by Charlotte Rae.
The ending may be considered a downer but the author really had nowhere else to go. Available on DVD, see this film. It will warm your heart and get those shoes out for some fine dancing!
Bea Asher is widowed at middle age. She sings of her loneliness and the deprivation brought about by her husband's passing.Bea is about to settle down to a grim widowhood, when a waitress, in a restaurant, tells her that you start living once your husband has died.
Though this statement is shocking, Bea goes with the woman to the Stardust Ballroom, a carefree lounge where couples dance to their pleasure. While there, Bea meets postman Al Green and the two are a match made up in heaven. Bea dances up a storm, changes that gray hair to bright red and becomes a live-wire not quite almost as Stapleton depicted in Woody Allen's "Interiors." Life has more meaning now, despite the anger conveyed by her pristine daughter and sister, Helen, shown in a memorable scene by Charlotte Rae.
The ending may be considered a downer but the author really had nowhere else to go. Available on DVD, see this film. It will warm your heart and get those shoes out for some fine dancing!
Low-Key And Sentimental
Lechuguilla21 February 2011
Maureen Stapleton gives a fine performance in this simple and straightforward story of an older woman trying to get on with her life after her husband dies.
Stapleton's performance aside, the film has the look and feel of a typical 1970's made-for-TV movie of the week. In addition to period costumes and props, the visuals are very dark. And the background music is annoyingly nondescript. Further, I did not care for the plot device wherein Stapleton's character suddenly bursts into non-melodic song, at odd moments. It seemed unnatural and intrusive.
A big part of the plot takes place at the ballroom. Here, the filmmaker could have included well-known songs from the big band era, songs that viewers could identify with. But, for whatever reason, the filmmaker passed up this opportunity, and chose instead more nondescript music that quickly becomes tiresome.
Although this film is not bad, it was a disappointment to me. But other viewers may find interest in it, especially if they're looking for a low-key, sentimental story, or a film with a fine performance from Maureen Stapleton.
Stapleton's performance aside, the film has the look and feel of a typical 1970's made-for-TV movie of the week. In addition to period costumes and props, the visuals are very dark. And the background music is annoyingly nondescript. Further, I did not care for the plot device wherein Stapleton's character suddenly bursts into non-melodic song, at odd moments. It seemed unnatural and intrusive.
A big part of the plot takes place at the ballroom. Here, the filmmaker could have included well-known songs from the big band era, songs that viewers could identify with. But, for whatever reason, the filmmaker passed up this opportunity, and chose instead more nondescript music that quickly becomes tiresome.
Although this film is not bad, it was a disappointment to me. But other viewers may find interest in it, especially if they're looking for a low-key, sentimental story, or a film with a fine performance from Maureen Stapleton.
A mid-life romance under the mirror ball...
moonspinner5529 August 2017
Maureen Stapleton plays a middle-aged widow in the Bronx who gets invited out for an evening with the girls to a local ballroom for elderly hoofers; there, she meets portly, starry-eyed Charles Durning, whose adoration makes her feel good about herself for the first time since her husband was alive. Acclaimed TV-movie approaches some interesting subjects (a sister's jealousy, an overprotective daughter's anger, a romance blooming in the autumn of a woman's years), and yet the plastic coating over this production is so thick that little of it rings true. The ballroom itself, filled to capacity with wily men eager to get out there and strut there stuff, may be a metaphor for the lives of its graying dancers--Last Chance For Happiness--but the collection of colorful characters Stapleton meets there are a romanticized group. Writer Jerome Kass even throws in the gambit of sung lyrics used as innermost thoughts, when what his teleplay really needs is some casual, natural interaction (there's really only one sequence which achieves this, a scene between Stapleton and son Michael Brandon doing the dishes). Although the people are phonied-up, the performances are generally likable, particularly Durning's. But who can take that ending seriously? Not after 90 minutes of sonnets, soliloquies and stardust!
One of my Favorites
dgranata26 December 2015
This was my grandmother's favorite movie and when she passed away two years ago, I was determined to find it and watch it. I was able to locate a copy and overall was very happy to have found it. One thing that was a bit disappointing is that Bea Arthur sings the song 50% on her one woman show CD and speaks of the movie (another reason I wanted to see it), my copy did not contain the song. I can very easily understand why this was one my grandmother's favorite movies, and I have watched it on her birthday the past two years. Both Maureen Stapleton and Charles Durning were fantastic as elderly, single love interests and for a TV movie made in the 1970's it was pretty darn good!
Enjoying the nostalgia, but not the execution of it
mlcisallyouget3 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
As a Gen X, I'm enjoying the nostalgia of seeing these authentic 70s scenes, outfits, cars, etc. The premise of this story is promising, yet delivered in a pretty unacceptable way.
First, these folks are in their early 50s - why are they being portrayed as at the ends of their lives? I realize 50 was "over the hill" at that time but my goodness. I'm 56 and feel and act a lot "younger" than these folks are portrayed. I agree with other reviewers that the whole "I'm married" story is not dealt with very well. Like, please explain it to us, the viewers! I understand the whole desire to live for today and everything, but it seems quite unfair to the wife, whoever or wherever she is. It seems a cop out to leave it to our imagination. The two in the story I guess we're supposed to believe they just don't care, and that's not so much living for today as being selfish. Is the wife sad? Sitting at home with dinner waiting? I couldn't help thinking of her.
The ending - really? At 50? Is this realistic? It's not like this woman is 80 or 90 for goodness' sake! Oh, and the oddly placed singing as if it's a musical is weird. Is it a musical, or is it not? It would be much less jarring if they were being portrayed as actually singing to themselves or performing, not as if it's a musical. And more inside the Stardust. I want to see more of what actually goes on at the Stardust since that's the title of the movie. I agree also they could have included some really awesome music, but the music is nondescript. I guess they didn't have the money for the rights or something.
The whole story - while maybe at the time it was new - is very cliche. Older (Boomer) woman rediscovers herself when spouse dies, finds that being married was rather stifling although she felt content at the time, some of her children and friends don't like the new her and want her to stay the same but there is one who is supportive. I wish this movie had been more imaginative (as in less cliche), but not with the odd singing. The characters are all caricatures that we've seen before. And the mail carrier's character is not fleshed out. This is a guy who normally apparently can't get ladies to dance with him, he lies when he says he's just looking for friendship but he's obviously on "the make", he's married and never said so - why on earth is she attracted to him? I don't see it - he can dance and he quotes literary works but what else is there about him? She says "he is a good man." Really?
I don't understand how she gets to be Queen - from what little they've shown us from inside the Stardust, she doesn't compare with the current Queen who arranges events and contests, welcomes newcomers and is friendly and outgoing to all. I'm not sure at all that she'd be very good at the job. I also don't understand in the middle of the film how they come in third in a dance competition because they are not that good compared to the other dancers we see.
I'm not knocking old movies, I love a lot of old movies and classics, but sorry, a classic this is not. It's just . . . Depressing.
First, these folks are in their early 50s - why are they being portrayed as at the ends of their lives? I realize 50 was "over the hill" at that time but my goodness. I'm 56 and feel and act a lot "younger" than these folks are portrayed. I agree with other reviewers that the whole "I'm married" story is not dealt with very well. Like, please explain it to us, the viewers! I understand the whole desire to live for today and everything, but it seems quite unfair to the wife, whoever or wherever she is. It seems a cop out to leave it to our imagination. The two in the story I guess we're supposed to believe they just don't care, and that's not so much living for today as being selfish. Is the wife sad? Sitting at home with dinner waiting? I couldn't help thinking of her.
The ending - really? At 50? Is this realistic? It's not like this woman is 80 or 90 for goodness' sake! Oh, and the oddly placed singing as if it's a musical is weird. Is it a musical, or is it not? It would be much less jarring if they were being portrayed as actually singing to themselves or performing, not as if it's a musical. And more inside the Stardust. I want to see more of what actually goes on at the Stardust since that's the title of the movie. I agree also they could have included some really awesome music, but the music is nondescript. I guess they didn't have the money for the rights or something.
The whole story - while maybe at the time it was new - is very cliche. Older (Boomer) woman rediscovers herself when spouse dies, finds that being married was rather stifling although she felt content at the time, some of her children and friends don't like the new her and want her to stay the same but there is one who is supportive. I wish this movie had been more imaginative (as in less cliche), but not with the odd singing. The characters are all caricatures that we've seen before. And the mail carrier's character is not fleshed out. This is a guy who normally apparently can't get ladies to dance with him, he lies when he says he's just looking for friendship but he's obviously on "the make", he's married and never said so - why on earth is she attracted to him? I don't see it - he can dance and he quotes literary works but what else is there about him? She says "he is a good man." Really?
I don't understand how she gets to be Queen - from what little they've shown us from inside the Stardust, she doesn't compare with the current Queen who arranges events and contests, welcomes newcomers and is friendly and outgoing to all. I'm not sure at all that she'd be very good at the job. I also don't understand in the middle of the film how they come in third in a dance competition because they are not that good compared to the other dancers we see.
I'm not knocking old movies, I love a lot of old movies and classics, but sorry, a classic this is not. It's just . . . Depressing.
Ain't this some sorta "Women's Picture, Schultz? So then .........
redryan646 January 2016
..............NOW WHY WOULD a burly, blue collar and rather gruff retired ex copper like you be reviewing some picture like this? It has everyday type characters that are put through their paces against what surely would be considered to be some very unglamorous scenario in ordinary, working class settings.
WELL THE ANSWER that we must give to Schultz and all the rest of you doubters is a resounding, No! This is far more complex a story than that and cannot be pigeon holed so easily. In fact if one would give it another (or even first) viewing then just what we mean would become apparent.
WE FOUND THIS to be a very compelling story, even at the time of its premier telecast over forty years ago. (My God, Schultz, where has the time gone!) No doubt the reason is that it is well mounted with great scenes, intelligently written and is not a bit pretentious. The story is brought to life by a fine cast which is headed up by Miss Maureen Stapleton (Award Winner) and Mr. Charles Durning.
IT THE INCLUSION of the latter which is what proved to be a surprise in the cast, essentially stealing the show. Although he had perhaps been under-appreciated for his acting skills, he had established the reputation of being the most dependable of supporting players in so many character acting parts.
WITH THIS FILM, a "Made for TV" movie, Charles put himself onto yet another level in his public persona. His skills in bringing off his characterization of Al Green, Letter Carrier, U.S. Postal Department was bolstered by and possibly eclipsed by his skills as a ballroom dancer. Few if any knew that the rather stout physique of his concealed the grace and skills that he had honed up in previous years while working as a dance instructor.
ONCE AGAIN, WE must repeat and cannot overemphasize the wide appeal that this story has. It surely could have been made as a theatrical film; but alas, was relegated to the "lesser" venue of the small screen in our living rooms.
WELL AS EVEN Schultz and myself have come to realize, this was Oscar's loss and Emmy's windfall.
WELL THE ANSWER that we must give to Schultz and all the rest of you doubters is a resounding, No! This is far more complex a story than that and cannot be pigeon holed so easily. In fact if one would give it another (or even first) viewing then just what we mean would become apparent.
WE FOUND THIS to be a very compelling story, even at the time of its premier telecast over forty years ago. (My God, Schultz, where has the time gone!) No doubt the reason is that it is well mounted with great scenes, intelligently written and is not a bit pretentious. The story is brought to life by a fine cast which is headed up by Miss Maureen Stapleton (Award Winner) and Mr. Charles Durning.
IT THE INCLUSION of the latter which is what proved to be a surprise in the cast, essentially stealing the show. Although he had perhaps been under-appreciated for his acting skills, he had established the reputation of being the most dependable of supporting players in so many character acting parts.
WITH THIS FILM, a "Made for TV" movie, Charles put himself onto yet another level in his public persona. His skills in bringing off his characterization of Al Green, Letter Carrier, U.S. Postal Department was bolstered by and possibly eclipsed by his skills as a ballroom dancer. Few if any knew that the rather stout physique of his concealed the grace and skills that he had honed up in previous years while working as a dance instructor.
ONCE AGAIN, WE must repeat and cannot overemphasize the wide appeal that this story has. It surely could have been made as a theatrical film; but alas, was relegated to the "lesser" venue of the small screen in our living rooms.
WELL AS EVEN Schultz and myself have come to realize, this was Oscar's loss and Emmy's windfall.
Impressive film, IMDb missing soundtrack listing
kcarr9714 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I wish that IMDb.com would have added the soundtrack listing because the songs and melodies were so beautiful.
I enjoyed the film immensely for the nostalgia, for a moment to see Maureen Stapleton & Charles Durning once more, for the lovely, wistful songs and much more.
Like many audiences, I would have appreciated the ending to be more upbeat. Maureen was only 48 yrs old at the time she performed in this film and I assumed she was playing a 50 to 55 year old lady, therefore, it was not necessary to end the relationship in such a sorrowful way because this is not a normal age for a person to pass away, although it certainly does happen.
I think it would have been more realistic to show that middle and old age is not just for dying. There is still a lot to learn and time to grow. It's been said, "It's never too late to change your life (or fall in love)".
The choice for them to end the movie as they did was not a major flaw, however.
It was still a terrific movie and one I had not seen before. Hope they show it on TV again in the near future.
I enjoyed the film immensely for the nostalgia, for a moment to see Maureen Stapleton & Charles Durning once more, for the lovely, wistful songs and much more.
Like many audiences, I would have appreciated the ending to be more upbeat. Maureen was only 48 yrs old at the time she performed in this film and I assumed she was playing a 50 to 55 year old lady, therefore, it was not necessary to end the relationship in such a sorrowful way because this is not a normal age for a person to pass away, although it certainly does happen.
I think it would have been more realistic to show that middle and old age is not just for dying. There is still a lot to learn and time to grow. It's been said, "It's never too late to change your life (or fall in love)".
The choice for them to end the movie as they did was not a major flaw, however.
It was still a terrific movie and one I had not seen before. Hope they show it on TV again in the near future.
Extraordinary
evastaitz-104744 August 2017
the story is wonderful, dancing superb and the acting excellent. i first saw this 40 years ago; i was 30 and have seen it many times over all those years. why has this not been put on a DVD? it truly is a masterpiece.
i wonder if anyone is imaginative enough to see that this gets another release at a movie house or community centers including senior centers. i viewed it on you tube this time. try it, you will like it!
i wonder if anyone is imaginative enough to see that this gets another release at a movie house or community centers including senior centers. i viewed it on you tube this time. try it, you will like it!
This Should Be A Classic
shailenchawla23 March 2022
I discovered The Queen of the Stardust Ballroom a few years ago when a friend recommended it. I found print online which was not very good but I still loved what I saw
Recently I bought the Blu Ray of the film and saw a good print with clear sound and it bowled me over. This has to be one of the warmest and nicest feel good films ever made. The fact that its between two "regular" middle aged people makes it that much more special and relatable
The storyline is relatively simple but its the main actors that elevate the film above the ordinary
Maureen Stapleton transitions from grief to determination to a woman in love with poise and grace. She's a wonderful actress and nothing less would have been expected
For me the surprise was Charles Durning. We have known him from film after film to be a tough talking actor. Who knew he had this soft romantic side to him. From the time he steps in its as if the film is completely transformed. He is simply outstanding as the charming Shakespeare quoting mailman who can sing (not too badly) and dance. I definitely did not expect to see his portly frame glide so effortlessly and gracefully across the dance floor. Turns out he was a dance instructor for many years before he became an actor. I wonder why no other film maker made use of this talent again
I have rewatched the film several times over and it has left me smiling everytime. This is such a believable little story, even the sometimes off-key singing by the actors makes it that much more real and easy to engage with
I am surprised this film isn't better known than it is and why it doesn't count as a classic. Though it was nominated for a bunch of awards and even won a few,, it definitely needs more recognition than that.
Recently I bought the Blu Ray of the film and saw a good print with clear sound and it bowled me over. This has to be one of the warmest and nicest feel good films ever made. The fact that its between two "regular" middle aged people makes it that much more special and relatable
The storyline is relatively simple but its the main actors that elevate the film above the ordinary
Maureen Stapleton transitions from grief to determination to a woman in love with poise and grace. She's a wonderful actress and nothing less would have been expected
For me the surprise was Charles Durning. We have known him from film after film to be a tough talking actor. Who knew he had this soft romantic side to him. From the time he steps in its as if the film is completely transformed. He is simply outstanding as the charming Shakespeare quoting mailman who can sing (not too badly) and dance. I definitely did not expect to see his portly frame glide so effortlessly and gracefully across the dance floor. Turns out he was a dance instructor for many years before he became an actor. I wonder why no other film maker made use of this talent again
I have rewatched the film several times over and it has left me smiling everytime. This is such a believable little story, even the sometimes off-key singing by the actors makes it that much more real and easy to engage with
I am surprised this film isn't better known than it is and why it doesn't count as a classic. Though it was nominated for a bunch of awards and even won a few,, it definitely needs more recognition than that.
You're never too old
angellvr12314 November 2019
This is a great movie. Loved the music, the actors. And the dancing. If watching it as a teen you might not understand or appreciate the movie. It is a great movie, the actors are not bikini models nor muscle men. Just average joes and Jane. So you can identify with them.
LOVE AT 50
janeite-2936623 September 2018
Anyone who doesn't think a short, fat man can be sexy should see this movie. The story, a perfect pairing of Maureen Stapleton and Charles Durning absolutely draws you in. The ballroom scenes, quirky characters and a totally charming love story. The one drawback is an abrupt, senseless ending. So skip the ending and enjoy Charles Durning's seductive dancing with Maureen. If you are like me you will want to learn more about his amazing life, humble beginnings, World War II hero, ending with a prolific mid life movie career.
My favorite television movie
vincentlynch-moonoi22 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I was just in my mid-twenties when this appeared on CBS, and all these years later -- 47 years -- I was delighted to see this come out on Blu Ray. Of all the tv-movies I ever watched, this was my favorite. Clearly Maureen Stapleton and Charles Durning had been in other films and television programs before this, but it was in this that I found them both memorable (although her performance in 1970s "Airport" was wonderful). There was just something special and sentimental about their performances here. I have to admit not being very excited by their singing here, but their acting more than made up for that. And the one song -- "I Love To Dance Like They Used To Dance" -- is a great song, and especially nicely done on a recording by Bing Crosby (but that's another story).
Charming. Just charming.
Charming. Just charming.
A sweet film!
RodrigAndrisan29 July 2022
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
