Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA professional gambler is trapped into marrying within a Mexican family under an Aztec curse.A professional gambler is trapped into marrying within a Mexican family under an Aztec curse.A professional gambler is trapped into marrying within a Mexican family under an Aztec curse.
Photos
Jack Brami
- Mexican Bandit
- (non crédité)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAt one point The Beatles were set to make this film, but they backed out.
- Citations
Major Patten: Sorry to bust in like this but a drink would be pretty welcome. Took me ten hours from your gate to the front door.
Don Jose: I know. Fortunately, you found a short cut.
Commentaire à la une
Just plain stupid.....
The plots for this film are VERY unusual and very confusing. It all starts with Richard Widmark insulting an idiotic Mexican guy (Topol of all people) and then marrying a nympho with a strange family curse. She is super-rich but also super sex-crazed. There are LOTS of strange subplots involving the children of the various characters--and all of it seems, well, confusing.
"A Talent for Loving" is like a train wreck--a terribly unfunny train wreck. I have rarely seen a film try so very hard to be funny and fail at it so miserably. It's a sex spoof-comedy-western--and does a lousy job in all three categories. As a sexy film, it never really delivers and provides lots of innuendos but nothing that is terribly sexy. As a comedy, it's just not funny and tries in a shotgun manner to get laughs. In other words, throw enough silly situations and vignettes into the film and PERHAPS one of them will make you laugh...or not! As a western, it's not entertaining--especially with a lot of non-Indians playing the Indians (sort of like Mel Brooks playing an Indian in "Blazing Saddles"). It's terrible and I can see why it was never released theatrically. And, in many ways, it reminds me of the 1967 version of "Casino Royale"--another sex comedy that simply is unfunny and rarely sexy.
A bad film is practically every way and I am sure that this was a big source of embarrassment for all those involved.
"A Talent for Loving" is like a train wreck--a terribly unfunny train wreck. I have rarely seen a film try so very hard to be funny and fail at it so miserably. It's a sex spoof-comedy-western--and does a lousy job in all three categories. As a sexy film, it never really delivers and provides lots of innuendos but nothing that is terribly sexy. As a comedy, it's just not funny and tries in a shotgun manner to get laughs. In other words, throw enough silly situations and vignettes into the film and PERHAPS one of them will make you laugh...or not! As a western, it's not entertaining--especially with a lot of non-Indians playing the Indians (sort of like Mel Brooks playing an Indian in "Blazing Saddles"). It's terrible and I can see why it was never released theatrically. And, in many ways, it reminds me of the 1967 version of "Casino Royale"--another sex comedy that simply is unfunny and rarely sexy.
A bad film is practically every way and I am sure that this was a big source of embarrassment for all those involved.
utile•91
- planktonrules
- 10 mai 2012
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et regarder afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was A Talent for Loving (1973) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre