My Past (1931) Poster

(1931)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
the one about the businessmen and the actress
blanche-228 June 2015
"My Past" -- and in precode Hollywood, you had one -- was released in 1931 and starred Bebe Daniels, her husband, Ben Lyon, Lewis Stone, Joan Blondell, and Natalie Moorhead.

Daniels plays an actress, Doree Macy, who is crazy in love with Robert Byrne (Lyon), a married man whose wife is away supposedly getting a divorce. Meanwhile, an older man, John Thornley (Stone) is in love with Doree also.

Blondell, who is Doree's friend Marion, warns her that these married guys are just out for a good time and their wives are never getting a divorce.

Robert's wife returns, and, as Marion warned, he returns to her. He does love Doree. She acts as if she understands, but she's devastated. She takes up with the gentlemanly Thornley, but her heart isn't in it. She's fond of him, but her heart is still with Robert.

Very precode -- scanty clothes, implied sex, the whole shebang. The acting is okay for the era. As sometimes is found in these very early '30s films, there are big pauses between sentences, probably because people still weren't sure how to talk in the movies. Blondell is a standout, but then, she always is. Even in a small role, she shines.

Lyon became an executive at 20th Century Fox, a job he did while still doing his popular radio show with Daniels in England, where the couple eventually moved. They were married for 41 years, until her death. Lyon is credited with discovering and naming Marilyn Monroe while he worked in casting at Fox.

This movie doesn't move all that quickly but it's short and worth seeing for the cast and the whole precode "aura."
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's complicated
skinnybert21 June 2020
It's not a storybook romance, it's not revenge, and it's certainly not action. Tempers don't get out of hand, and nobody breaks any dishes, though hearts are broken -- some, several times. If anything, almost everyone involved is more polite than others expect ... and that's the problem, since nobody wants to hurt anyone either. A fairly mature telling of how romantic intertwining may or may not work, and how the people involved might handle it. The characters are surprisingly honest about their failings, and none are either blamed or blameless.

That being said, a lot of the acting comes and goes. There's quite a bit of overly clear articulation early on, especially from Ben Lyon. Joan is mostly just serviceable with a flash or two of what made her so special elsewhere. Bebe shows improvement from her earlier roles; in one lonely scene with roses, she wins us entirely without words. Lewis Stone is almost unfailingly sympathetic, just as he is so often -- when a scene really works, it's often because of him, whether alone or with others. Natalie Moorhead seems born to this kind of role, so it's a pleasure to see her do it again.

All in all, a worthwhile story, nicely filmed and clearly audible. Recommended for its unusual subtlety, and the fantastic proliferation of Art Deco design and late-flapper gowns (especially on Moorhead).
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bebe Daniels sizzles
gbill-748771 November 2022
"How did you know I was married?" "For one thing, you have that certain look." "Oh, yeah? Well, you needn't worry about her. You see, Consuelo and I, well, she does as she likes and I do what I like."

Bebe Daniels is at the top of her flirting game here, and looks gorgeous in her various gowns, a sailor outfit, and that bathing suit with the big fish on it. After diving into the water, she strips out of the latter and challenges a young man (her real-life husband Ben Lyon) to catch her, swimming away provocatively. Later she asks him about his marriage and he tells her it's not an issue, because he and his wife have an "understanding." After they spend the night together, she's shown in her lingerie, toweling off her outstretched leg (ah, ya gotta love the pre-Code staples). And this is only one man she's seeing - there's also Lewis Stone's character, who despite looking a bit old to be involved with her, eventually has a physical relationship with her as well (after a passionate kiss, he says "Young lady, you're on the edge of starting something that you don't dare finish," to which she replies "Am I?" before pulling him back in for another).

Her buddy (Joan Blondell) casts doubt on just how open the younger man's marriage is, or whether he's actually getting a divorce ("Take it from me, I know these young, married men"), and sure enough, she's right. His wife (Natalie Moorhead) shows up, and while Daniels' character puts on a brave face, she's heartbroken - but it turns out the wife has a man of her own in Paris ("Poogie", lol), and wants a divorce. It's a bit melodramatic as Daniels' character is then away with Stone's when Lyon's discovers he's free, and the story is told in a rather slow, methodical way in its second half, which was unfortunate. However, while it threatened to turn into a morality story, the ending was rather sweet. When you add that together with the pre-Code acceptance of pre-marital sex and divorce, along with the charms of Daniels and Blondell, it all makes for an enjoyable film.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Nothing important happens to some people you don't care about
1930s_Time_Machine30 April 2023
Although Roy DelRuth made his pretty decent version of THE MALTESE FALCON just a few weeks after this, he gives the impression here that he hadn't quite yet mastered how to make a talking picture. This one does creak a bit!

Maybe the sound recording equipment he had for this was particularly primitive or maybe William Wellman 'had borrowed' the decent stuff to make his OTHER MEN'S WOMEN (a much, much better film than this) on the next sound stage - which also featured Joan Blondell. Whatever the reason, the result is that it's one of those pictures where everyone waits their turn to speak - very slowly and carefully as though they're speaking to their bank's automated voice recognition system. This is a major frustration; it really slows everything down giving an artificial and detached feel to the whole thing.

Despite the film's glacial pace, Bebe Daniels puts in a relatively good performance. When you get used to the weird slow motion in real time thing, you can appreciate that she could actually a very good actress. This however is not her finest hour but without her, this wouldn't be watching at all.

It's interesting to compare Bebe Daniels' performance with that of Joan Blondell. Although it was in the silents, Bebe Daniels had over a decade of experience making movies. Joan was a relative newcomer and that sadly shows. As Joan's biggest fan, it pains me to conclude that her acting in this is quite awful. If her future had relied on her performance in this, nobody would ever have heard of her today. Her performance however isn't all that matters, she's just so likeable and lovely that audiences just fell in love with her.

Ignoring the film's main shortcoming the overall look is very impressive and sophisticated - it feels more MGM movie than something from Warner Brothers (and about the rich not the poor). High quality production however doesn't compensate for the flimsy and trivial story and theatrical style script. In a nutshell, it's about a flighty, flirty flapper: Bebe Daniels who is torn between a lovely old (very old) man or younger (married) man. She wants to settle down but he only wants an affair.....is it love or is it lust? .......yes, that old story! It's quite interesting to see something contemporarily familiar in the context of 1930.

Although we don't get to see much of the world beyond the yacht and the posh hotels, as a trip on a celluloid Time Machine, it's a fascinating insight into the attitudes of 1930. Other than that or wanting to see a not very impressive young Joan Blondell in a fairly big supporting role, I cannot think of any reason to watch this. A pointless badly told story about uninteresting people.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fascinatingy amoral.
mark.waltz3 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
A top notch, fun and racy pre-code drama that has three very uninhibited women of different temperaments and ethical standards, with leading lady Bebe Daniels going after the married Ben Lyon (whom she had married the previous year in real life), fun loving Joan Blondell (using older men for paid for good times but hoping one her own age comes along to settle down with) and Lyon's estranged wife, Natalie Moorehead, who enjoys no strings attached flings.

Then there's wealthy older businessman Lewis Stone whom each of the women at least one point in the film make moves on, hardly a lover boy type, but dashing in a way that Judge Hardy never was. The ethical moral of this is that most women ultimately want a husband, but aren't opposed to a little fun until that comes along, fun being of the sexual variety. Blondell and Moorehead get the best lines and know how to snark them out. Well directed by Roy Del Ruth with great art decco sets, the type that made depression era audiences drool.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
My, oh my...
AAdaSC6 May 2019
.....that was a bit boring. There is an interesting set-up with relationship anomiles playing out all over the place. Lewis Stone (John) is the rich sugar daddy type who spends all his time entertaining on his yacht, especially with the company of actress Bebe Daniels (Doree) and her friend Joan Blondell (Marion) who seems to pair off with her sugar daddy Albert Gran (Lionel). Ben Lyon (Bob) works for Stone and is invited on board to one of these yacht adventures and falls in love with Daniels. Uh-oh, should be loads of tension between boss and employee over this one...

Well, there isn't. Stone seems to encourage this other relationship with the woman he loves. What? He also laughs a lot in quite a creepy way which doesn't make any sense. And the film drags. It's good that it depicts a complicated world of relationships but it's just not very realistic. Natalie Moorhead (Consuelo) turns up as Lyon's wife and they have quite a frank discussion about their marriage. It's definitely pre-code material. Watch for the settings and the outfits and the female acting and you get some entertainment out of things. Lewis Stone.....!!....?...weirdo.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
two business guys fall in love with actress
bdar15 November 2005
Interesting movie for 1931 at best. better Hollywood productions were out the, Acting leaves a bit to be desire. The movie has a very slow and tedious start. One has to admit that the sound quality was pretty compare to others movies of that period. The film quality is also very good. I am not sure if it is because I saw it on Time Warner Classic (TMC) and they may have done some restoration of the original print. Either way the quality is very nice for a movie from that period. Bebe Daniels does her usual fast acting and speech delivery gig. But her acting is also as usual, very average for that era. Overall I will say that this movie is worth watching.
6 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The morals in this film are surprising...even now in the 21st century.
planktonrules17 September 2022
Folks who haven't seen many old films often assume that they were all morally chaste and 'nice'. Well, this was true of nearly all films made between 1934 and about 1960 due to the tough Production Code which severely restricted the content in Hollywood films. However, before July, 1934, films were occasionally pretty scandalous...even by modern standards. While "My Past" doesn't have any nudity and the language is all strictly PG-rated, the plot itself is, well, rather sleazy...surprisingly so.

Doree Macy is an actress...and she apparently has a non-conventional sense of morality. She is interested in two men who both run a steel company. John (Lewis Stone) is older and single...Bob (Ben Lyon) is married. Of the two, she prefers Bob but realizes that because he's married, their relationship cannot result in marriage. But she throws caution to the wind and while his wife is away, the two have an affair. When the wife returns, Doree walks away...saying it was all in good fun. What she doesn't realize is that Bob's wife is totally disinterested in him...and wants a divorce. But by then it's too late...Doree is back with John. What's next?

Even by modern standards, this movie is pretty sleazy since it seems very pro-adultery. Additionally, Doree is quite the bohemian, swimming naked with Bob and enjoying a lusty sex life. It's not surprising that films like this eventually resulted in some backlash from 1930s audiences, and by 1934 box office receipts were way down...and Hollywood decided to actually enforce the new Code.

So is it any good? No. It's not just that the film offers a sleazy message...but it actually manages to be awfully boring in the process!! How can a film feature a nude swimming scene, adultery and more...yet manage to put you to sleep? Well, this one sure did for me!
2 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Shows a sense of twenties morality, rather Fitzgeraldian: it's fun!
mmipyle10 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I watched "My Past" (1931) with Bebe Daniels, Lewis Stone, and Ben Lyon. Also in the cast are Joan Blondell in her eighth film and Natalie Moorhead. I really enjoyed this very, very Pre-Code film, but I must admit that my wife found it unnerving and didn't like it. She felt she would never have been able to trust Ben Lyon from his behavior in the film. Well, I think that the film shows the Fitzgeraldian sense of twenties rebellion with and against ideas of Victorian marriage very well. It may not be what the viewer believes in at all, but it does a good job of doing what it set out to do. Actually, Lewis Stone is a step away from Fitzgeraldian because he portrays a much older man in this film, more in line with Victorian morality (which wasn't especially 'moral', and that's what Stone represents) rather than the twenties.

Ben Lyon is 'married' (in name only) to Natalie Moorhead in the film. She's definitely NOT 'married' in the sense of the vow on the certificate! She's been over in Paris having an affair with someone while he's been involved almost neurotically with business on this end. Then comes Bebe Daniels, an actress who's known Lewis Stone for seven years and who has been having a relationship (but evidently not a physical one) with him for all those years. Well, when Lyon becomes involved, eventually there is a consummation with Stone and Daniels. All kinds of 'at sea' problems ensue. In the end, Daniels and Lyon end up together, Moorhead off of the register and Stone creating the bridge that leads to the togetherness of the two.

I really liked this film. I think it shows the times quite well. It's edgy, and it's meant to be. It must have been something to talk about in its day. Blondell, by the way, is about as good looking in this film as she ever appeared in film! She's a knockout! Moorhead is good as always, but basically wasted in a role made too small. Daniels, the more I watch her, is simply amazing as an actress. She's not showy at all; very subtle, in fact; and a fine actress for it. I've watched Daniels at least three times in the past week or so, and she's taken scenes from others, sometimes leading actors, without even trying.

I enjoyed this one immensely - even if Margaret didn't...
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed