A Tale of Two Cities (1917) User Reviews

Frank Lloyd Raises the Dickens with William Farnum

[wes-connors · 6/10 · 2 May 2009]

Frank Lloyd's silent version of Charles Dickens' "A Tale of Two Cities" may make you wonder why D.W. Griffith didn't direct his own version of the classic (not that he didn't come close, on a few occasions). Mr. Lloyd's Griffith-like direction is a plus; though, it's somehow not as good as the original. William Farnum, who was one of the leading actors of the teens, does a fine job in the leading role; seeing Mr. Farnum play both as reluctant French nobleman "Charles Darnay" and English alcoholic lawyer "Sydney Carton" is, today, the main attraction. While filled with decent performances, the more famous sound re-makes lose something by casting different men in the lead roles. Beautiful Jewel Carmen has no trouble attracting both men, as "Lucie Manette". And, Florence Vidor (King's wife) sews up stardom on the way to the guillotine. "A Tale of Two Cities" was considered a top production in its time, but it doesn't possess the timeless quality you'll find in many other silent movies.

****** A Tale of Two Cities (3/11/17) Frank Lloyd ~ William Farnum, Jewel Carmen, Charles Clary, Josef Swickard

surprisingly good

[fred3f · 6/10 · 29 August 2007]

Not a great film but I was surprised at how much I enjoyed it. Farnum is excellent in a double role, and Jewel Carmen is sympathetic as Miss Manette. The film owes a lot to D. W. Griffith. The editing style, the plot development, the epic scope and the direction are all, strictly David Wark. However, give the director (Frank Lloyd) credit; he knew a good thing when he saw it, and even if he did copy Griffith, at least he did it well. Frank Lloyd eventually became a very capable director with his own style. Like Griffith he had a way of saying a lot in a few frames and doing it in a satisfying way. He moves things right along and so is able to keep the interest of even a modern viewer. If you are a film student, you could learn a lot about artistic economy from watching this film. However, most of us will just be happy that the director is able to keep our interest, and not waste our time with overly long scenes. Only in the very last couple of minutes does it drag slightly. But I suspect that what we see as dragging today, would have been considered art in 1917. There is also a creative use of double exposures and other effects that give the film a bit of visual excitement.

To the average intelligent viewer - don't go too far out of your way, but if you end up seeing it, it will keep your interest better than many modern films and you will be entertained.

It Wasn't The Best of Films. It Wasn't the Worst of Films

[boblipton · 6/10 · 15 October 2003]

This well-mounted and visually interesting silent version of the Dickens novel is a good effort, but, of course, it pales before the 1935 version starring Ronald Colman. As a silent film it suffers from too many title cards -- an artifact, no doubt, of the fondness for the book. One searches for nice things to say about this movie, but they all have to be qualified as "For 1917." Good set design for 1917. Good composition for 1917 and so forth. Still, the acting is good, the story is there and if you want to see what was good in 1917, you can take a look at this. Or you could just stick with the 1935 version and I won't fault you.

Sparknotes version of Dickens

[MissSimonetta · 7/10 · 9 November 2017]

This 1917 adaptation of A Tale of Two Cities is nothing spectacular; however, William Farnum is absolutely great as Sydney Carton and Charles Darnay, stealing every scene he's in with great panache. One wishes the other actors had as much to do.

The big problem is that the filmmakers assume the audience has read the book and therefore they assume they only need to hit the major beats of the story without doing much to establish character. What results is a rather unimpressive narrative experience, though as I said, Farnum keeps things lively, as do a few moments of truly striking composition and lighting. Otherwise, only silent film nerds and fans of the novel (both of which I'm lucky to be in this instance) will get much out of this movie.

A Tale of Two Cities review

[JoeytheBrit · 7/10 · 18 April 2020]

During the French Revolution, alcoholic barrister Sydney Carton defends the husband of the woman he loves. This version of Dickens' novel is an early prestige movie featuring some impressive double exposure work, particularly in the timing of William Farnum who plays both Carton and the man he's trying to save from the gallows. Director Frank Lloyd flatters Griffith with his style but isn't subject to D.W.'s tendency to string scenes out and shows great control with the film's many crowd scenes.

The Supreme Sacrifice

[lugonian · 6/10 · 7 February 2015]

A TALE OF TWO CITIES (Fox, 1917), directed by Frank Lloyd, marks the second Hollywood screen adaptation to the classic literary novel by Charles Dickens. Filmed earlier in 1911 starring Maurice Costello in the central character role of both Sydney Carton and his look-a-like double, Charles Darnay, an interesting aspect to the original was that the Dickens story was told in a little under thirty minutes. While it wouldn't take that long to read the complete novel, this second retelling in present form is a bit longer, around 81 minutes, yet not enough time to capture everything the book had to offer into just one motion picture. The Carton and Darnay roles this time were played by William Farnum, a name not too well known in recent years, but definitely one of the top leading actors of his day, years before assuming character parts in countless talkies of the thirties and forties, mostly "B" westerns. While Farnum did have a genuine speaking voice for talkies, he had a fine versatility for the silent screen.

With the plot told through passages of inter-titles in the silent film tradition, the story surprisingly opens with "In Saint Antoine where the frowning walls of the Bastille reminded the people of the woes in the threatening days that preceded the French Revolution," rather than the expected, "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness." The two cities in this story are London and Paris, with Paris being the essence of the plot. Before the story gets underway, the characters are introduced: Jacque DeFarge (Herschel Mayall), the wine shop keeper of Saint Antoine; Madame DeFarge (Rosita Marstini), his wife, "who knits constantly like fate weaving a web of destiny;" Doctor Alexander Manette (Josef Swickard), the old master of Defarge who, for many years, has been imprisoned in the Bastille.( A flashback taken from his written diary explains the circumstances leading to his unjust imprisonment); Soho, London, the residential district consisting of Jarvis Lorry (Marc Robbins), manager of Tellson's, the leading French and English bank in London; Charles Darnay (William Farnum), one of the many French refugees in Soho and nephew of Marquis St. Evremonde (Charles Clary), one of the most detested aristocrats in France; Lucie (Jewel Carmen), Manette's daughter who believes her father dead, raised by Miss Pross (Olive White) and a ward of Mr. Lorry; and Roger Cly (Ralph Lewis), Darnay's servant. Though Darnay is sympathetic towards the oppressed poor in Paris, renouncing his uncle's inheritance, he's later arrested for treason, and acquitted in Old Bailey's Court by lawyer, Sydney Carlton (William Farnum), a lonely alcoholic barrister. With the rein of terror July 14, 1789, starting the French Revolution that sends the condemned to death on the guillotine, it would be one of the mentioned characters to make a supreme sacrifice to save another for its climax. Other characters in the story consist of Gabelle, agent of the Marquise estate (William Clifford); Lawyer C.J. Stryver (Willard Louis); Gaspard (Harry Devere); and a condemned girl (Florence Vidor).

With other screen adaptations to A TALE OF TWO CITIES retold and recaptured decades into the future, with one British made version in 1958 with Dirk Bogarde, the most famous of all is the two hour 1935 MGM epic starring Ronald Colman as Sydney Carton, with the support by a cast of thousands. Though a project such as this might have been done under notable director, D.W. Griffith, whose ORPHANS OF THE STORM (1921) contained certain similarities to the Dickens novel, Frank Lloyd's direction for 1917 is quite impressive for its time. Fox Studios would follow this with another literary work, Victor Hugo's LES MISERABLES (1918) also featuring William Farnum. Sets and costumes for A TALE OF TWO CITIES capture the essence of 18th century Paris, and acting by it principal players are not as overdone nor primitive to what might be commonly expected from actors during that time. Take notice that one of the title cards misspells Carton's first name of Sydney to Sidney.

Unlike many movies of 1917, this edition of A TALE OF TWO CITIES fortunately survives intact. Though it seems unlikely to have ever been aired on public broadcast television or cable for that matter, it did get distribution to home video in 1997 through Critic's Choice Video with print from the Paul Killiam collection. Although the cardboard box lists music score composed by Philip Carli, the video, in fact, contains no scoring whatsoever. Even the print circulating on Youtube gets the silent treatment as well. Watching silent movies in mute condition can be the worst of times for anyone expecting either piano or organ scoring. For the best of times movie viewing, simply apply own instrumental recordings from either disc or from an all-music radio station to help with the proceedings in viewing a movie from the silent years. (***)

Farnum excels as Sydney Carton

[scsu1975 · 6/10 · 19 November 2022]

Quite a good adaptation of Dickens' book. William Farnum plays the dual roles of Charles Darnay and Sydney Carton. He is rather ho-hum as Darney, but he really shines as the brooding, wasted Carton. There are some clever scenes where Darnay and Carton appear side by side, and one scene where Carton stares into a mirror and sees Darnay's face staring back at him. The sets are impressive, and the storming of the Bastille is realistic and violent. Jewel Carmen, as Lucie Manette, is lovely. The climactic fight between Olive White (as Miss Pross) and Rosita Marstini (as Madame Defarge) is well staged - it really looks like they are beating the crap out of each other. The final scene is touching, as we "see" Carton's last thought. Frank Lloyd directed, but some sources claim William Desmond Taylor may have done some of the directing as well. Margaret Dumont supposedly has a bit in this, but I didn't spot her.