Just a one side glipse of the history. Completely laks any deep analisys of how the history played out. The opinions are comoleteñy bias and plain.
A more in depth analisis would have been more interesting and histoticaly accurate and not resemble to just one side pripaganda The documentation acompannih the are quite good with good animations and histolucal videos Overall is interesting to see as long as you are aware of the manipulation and all the bias involved.
The lasta chapter is just kind o a resumee of the previous ione so you can skip it comometeky. It shows one side if the historu quite weel , an interesting example of how to manipulate and bias your oponion on a matter if you don t know anything about the topic.
A more in depth analisis would have been more interesting and histoticaly accurate and not resemble to just one side pripaganda The documentation acompannih the are quite good with good animations and histolucal videos Overall is interesting to see as long as you are aware of the manipulation and all the bias involved.
The lasta chapter is just kind o a resumee of the previous ione so you can skip it comometeky. It shows one side if the historu quite weel , an interesting example of how to manipulate and bias your oponion on a matter if you don t know anything about the topic.