Yes, there's been a concerted effort to portray Oppenheimer's saga with flair yet relatability - a fictional narrative depicting the remarkable scientist's journey amidst a backdrop of ingratitude and intrigue, to which his response seems somewhat inadequate. Nonetheless, there's an attempt to imbue him with a sense of stoicism. On the performance front, it's commendable; I have no qualms there. The scenes, effects - all top-notch. What's intriguing is how the narrative subtly weaves in propaganda surrounding the ostensibly noble cause of a man whose legacy is tarnished by his role as a harbinger of destruction - yes, Oppenheimer, portrayed as nothing short of a mass murderer, the repercussions of which still echo today in the lingering fallout of atomic radiation. It's presented as an oversight, a mistake he regrets deeply, as if such a brilliant mind could overlook the devastating aftermath of such a weapon. It almost eclipses his genius, yet he believed it would stave off death. Naturally, he's depicted as belonging to a privileged class, surrounded by others of similar ilk. As the narrative goes, the people of Oppenheimer's ethnicity are inherently innocent, noble, and intelligent - always victims, never perpetrators. What's missing is the requisite political correctness demanded by contemporary cinema - the racial diversity, or LG...UHDTV characters, where historical accuracy seems to take a backseat. Perhaps they couldn't replace one of the "chosen ones" because, as the narrative implies, they're irreplaceable, while others are expendable.
I give 7 stars mostly because of the acting and the good screening, but there is little historical and factual validity.
I give 7 stars mostly because of the acting and the good screening, but there is little historical and factual validity.