Where was the evidence presented by Mirna's case? This was all about jessica and based on how the documentary presented her, people actually gained empathy for her. As the judge said in the docu, when people are clouded with their emotions they cannot think logically. And i think that's what happened in this documentary. It's so biased towards defending Jessica that this isn't even about Mirna's death anymore. Even the title suggests that the main topic of this is Jessica. From the court testimonies though, i can say that they truly have a point in lacking evidence. I just want to see if how it was defended by Mirna's side. What was their testimony? How did they counter that lacking evidence that was gathered in court? It makes no sense at all. There are either two things. Jessica did it or Mirna was having a rare occurrence where she was convulsing because of it.
Also if Mirna's family wanted justice, they should've done a full autopsy on their daughter's body. It could either could've brought more evidence to court or it could also appeal the truth on what really happened during the day that she was killed.
Also if Mirna's family wanted justice, they should've done a full autopsy on their daughter's body. It could either could've brought more evidence to court or it could also appeal the truth on what really happened during the day that she was killed.