I think the only reason for making this movie is to show the beginning of the events. It means to know where Taissa and the nun started. Of course, there was a good reference to the Conjuring at the end of the movie, but it wasn't really enough. The entire sequence related to the presence of the nun character was not more than 30 seconds, which means that it was really not possible to give more foliage to the story?
In a clichéd story, the writers tried to write a story around the character of the nun, but in no way could they even come close to the fear that we experienced in The Conjuring.
Twice in the movie, the nun was assumed to be a fool! Does this mean that this character has such low awareness of the environment and the movements of people around her? This one really contradicted the previous series of this movie!
In the end, although I didn't enjoy this movie, but in terms of actors, Taissa Farmiga was really great.
In a clichéd story, the writers tried to write a story around the character of the nun, but in no way could they even come close to the fear that we experienced in The Conjuring.
Twice in the movie, the nun was assumed to be a fool! Does this mean that this character has such low awareness of the environment and the movements of people around her? This one really contradicted the previous series of this movie!
In the end, although I didn't enjoy this movie, but in terms of actors, Taissa Farmiga was really great.