So many pieces of information which the team "deduces" during the runtime of the show are entirely inane.
"This must be the same killer, both victims had duct tape in the same place." "This victim was a doctor, who used aversion therapy, the killer must be an ex-patient." "This case file is about a child who was afraid of the dark, if the parents of the child continued the therapy after the doctor stopped it and made the child blind, it would have made them become a killer."
None of these assumptions had a modicum of actual reason backing them up. This exposition fueled by speculation is a thinly veiled way for the writers to tell a story, without actually showing it develop organically.
"This must be the same killer, both victims had duct tape in the same place." "This victim was a doctor, who used aversion therapy, the killer must be an ex-patient." "This case file is about a child who was afraid of the dark, if the parents of the child continued the therapy after the doctor stopped it and made the child blind, it would have made them become a killer."
None of these assumptions had a modicum of actual reason backing them up. This exposition fueled by speculation is a thinly veiled way for the writers to tell a story, without actually showing it develop organically.