Talk about long, drawn out and boring. All three stories of what happened were different, one of which was heresay. As Krag said, it was allowed according to their law. Shouldn't this trial have been somewhere neutral? Seems a little unjust to only follow the laws of the accuser. And once again Troi has proved that she is completely worthless. What good is she, when people are obviously lying, but she can't tell they're lying. Wasn't that why she was there? Thank God for Geordi, managing to figure out the truth. But when they show the truth, it's like oh, my bad, and a half-hearted apology. No mention of the fact that Apgar's wife and assistant told completely false stories, both of them claiming unequivocally that Riker killed Apgar. Apparently, their laws have nothing against perjury either. Another poorly written story.
Review of A Matter of Perspective
