The ring on column remains the definitory image of film for me. Like the causes, more than explicit , of the transformation of picture.
A good point - the option for Shane Briant as Dorian Gray. Not impressive, not the memorable, only the credible one .
Another virtues - the atmosphere and the way to craft his Harry by Nigel Davenport, like the precision of the time period ( from the year 1891 - the apparition of novel- to 1911 ) . TV movie, it proposes not exactly revelations and the second part can not be the most tasted by the admirers of novel but it works in just reasonable manner.
An interesting part - the induced nostalgia , not only for the half of century from the birth of movie but for the theater solutions for solve some scenes.
In short, just a correct adaptation.
A good point - the option for Shane Briant as Dorian Gray. Not impressive, not the memorable, only the credible one .
Another virtues - the atmosphere and the way to craft his Harry by Nigel Davenport, like the precision of the time period ( from the year 1891 - the apparition of novel- to 1911 ) . TV movie, it proposes not exactly revelations and the second part can not be the most tasted by the admirers of novel but it works in just reasonable manner.
An interesting part - the induced nostalgia , not only for the half of century from the birth of movie but for the theater solutions for solve some scenes.
In short, just a correct adaptation.