I love how film makers try and change the outcome of trials to suit their narrative of events. Other that the facts you see presented them s is pretty much a plea that release a murder or at the very least a willing accomplice. This is filmed from one very slanted perspective, Daniel Green and his bleeding heart attorney who thought she was the Queen of courts! They speculate on what could have or should have happened in the court room, it matters not, it didn't happen and you have to accept the consequences of your actions. The two perpetrators who commuted this crime were and are still guilty. Matters not who pulled the trigger, the morals of some attorneys absolutely astound me, doesn't matter that they are guilty my ego will get them a new trial because the first one was flawed! All trials are flawed, they are all on the brink of a mistrial if rules are followed to the letter. This film try's to dream up new evidence that doesn't exist!
Review of Moment of Truth
