Before I begin my review you will be wondering why I used Tatar instead of Mongol this is because the Mongols themselves and their contemporaries
used this as the national term for them - Mongol first came in to use 500 years after Genghis Khan.
The documentary with its authentic representation of the Tatar empire tells their history well with their conquests and the nature of their rule starting with the rise of Genghis Khan to Kublai Khan they dominated the 13th Century without being wooden with general knowledge and coherent duration of he empire.
It's minor faults are that the Huns and Uighurs should have got a background reference as these were the predecessors to the Tatars and in the post Tatar empire Timur and the Ottomans should have been mentioned.
The documentary with its authentic representation of the Tatar empire tells their history well with their conquests and the nature of their rule starting with the rise of Genghis Khan to Kublai Khan they dominated the 13th Century without being wooden with general knowledge and coherent duration of he empire.
It's minor faults are that the Huns and Uighurs should have got a background reference as these were the predecessors to the Tatars and in the post Tatar empire Timur and the Ottomans should have been mentioned.