I want to first state I'm not a Marilyn Manson fan and my critique of this documentary is about the documentary itself and it's premise.
Making a documentary to publicly accuse someone of crimes before these things have been determined as factual, is extremely disturbing to me. This additional makes me wonder the "authenticity" of abuse claims.
This documentary clearly paid ERW and creators to make it and she makes money by using MM as a tool.
Essentially the authenticity of this documentary is extremely questionable. The one-sidedness off the story telling and the clear intent to smear Manson and destroy his career and for the makers of this documentary to profit on doing so.
The question becomes what is abuse? Is it what Manson is accused of doing? Which is something that has not been proven or tried in court at this time. Or is it creating a documentary to destroy someone's career and life a decade later and to directly profit from doing so.
Making a documentary to publicly accuse someone of crimes before these things have been determined as factual, is extremely disturbing to me. This additional makes me wonder the "authenticity" of abuse claims.
This documentary clearly paid ERW and creators to make it and she makes money by using MM as a tool.
Essentially the authenticity of this documentary is extremely questionable. The one-sidedness off the story telling and the clear intent to smear Manson and destroy his career and for the makers of this documentary to profit on doing so.
The question becomes what is abuse? Is it what Manson is accused of doing? Which is something that has not been proven or tried in court at this time. Or is it creating a documentary to destroy someone's career and life a decade later and to directly profit from doing so.