2/10
Incoherent, insulting, ridiculous
31 January 2022
Ramirez acts well in this, hence my 2 rating, rather than 1. Other than that it is one of the worst GA I've seen.

In a trial if this nature, there would have been at least one expert witness, including one from the group who did the particular surgery in question. This would have established a key fact that would have completely changed the emphasis of the proceedings.

The ridiculously convenient last-gasp discovery was just an insult to intelligence.

Awful.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed