I have found myself shaking my head throughout this episode. Who decided this was a good crime/plot? Who doesn't take THAT deal from the prosecution? It is still not interesting when she gets convicted. I knew it was inevitable when she turned down the deal. After she was charged, she knew there was only one way the student would be able to go to college - THAT deal. Even if she was acquitted, he wouldn't get to go. She changed one test answer ONLY to help the student get into college so why would she do the opposite EVER? Writers/Producers: It MUST make sense! Bull "fixes" it for the student at the end but it doesn't matter. It is a non-episode.
Review of No Good Deed
