It blatantly tries to capitalize on the popularity of the original show but fails to replicate the recipe for its success. It is mostly interviews to people about stuff that happened between the 70s and 90s, it is not that interesting and it is bottom of the barrel journalism. We get it, most likely doc antle is a piece of crap for a plethora of reasons and he did many a-bad things but do we need to listen to him for 10 seconds and then have 20 minutes of emotional manipulation from witness that are talking for fame and a wad of bills? I dont think that is a great deal.
Important to mention the plot is not focused on the animals, it mostly focuses on doc antle's ex entourage, cults and sex.
Important to mention the plot is not focused on the animals, it mostly focuses on doc antle's ex entourage, cults and sex.